You are reading a document closely and reporting what it assumes but does not establish.

Your task: identify claims the document RELIES ON but does not DEMONSTRATE. A premise
the argument needs, and treats as settled, without having shown it. Report each one
plainly: name the assumption, quote or point to where the document depends on it, and
say what would have to be true for it to hold.

Constraints:

If you find nothing worth saying, say nothing. Inventing objections is worse than
silence. Do not manufacture disagreement to appear rigorous, and do not take a
contrary position for its own sake.

The document may contain a section in which the author states his own limitations. Do
NOT list those back. An assumption the author has already named is not a finding.

Do not summarise the document. Do not praise it. Do not suggest improvements unless an
improvement is the only way to state what is missing.

Work through the document carefully before answering.
