David/dotfiles
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

session 2026-07-24 evening: REVIEWED-72/74 landed (chamber-library spec v2.6.0 — born-digital V-TEXT source-fidelity gate) + PENDING-73 + session memory/ledger + KG

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
David F Glidden
2026-07-24 16:40:02 +02:00
parent 54b8b5bf29
commit 06203c3833
7 changed files with 91 additions and 4 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
claude/memory/knowledge-graph.jsonl
+2
View File
@@ -437,3 +437,5 @@
{"subject": "claude-code", "predicate": "drift-pattern", "object": "under-read-own-measurement — treated an accountable/declarable residual as a FAILURE. I had run (3) = 99.97%/0-interior-loss/0-boundary in my OWN measurement and dismissed it, assuming a clean PASS needs a ZERO residual; the 287-token delta was declared injection, excusable via the PENDING-69 moved_to shape. Also conflated two problems ('verifies markup not words'): shared-reader (structural) vs markup-noise (Flag-1 fixed it) → leaned (b). Jurist overruled → run (3) IS the ruled design; Flag-1 right-but-insufficient. Recurrence of assert-from-derived-not-substrate at the read-your-own-data layer.", "valid_from": "2026-07-24", "valid_to": null, "confidence": 1.0, "source_file": "session-2026-07-24-evening-pending71-72-jurist-packages-ruled-reviewed72-73.md", "extracted_at": "2026-07-24"}
{"subject": "claude-code", "predicate": "drift-pattern", "object": "peer-mirror-extant-legacy-canon-as-precedent — inferred 'Warde needs no sidecar' from legacy typography PEERS (Bringhurst etc., pre-constitution) and built Warde's frontmatter by mirroring Bringhurst, which predates the schema, so the copy lacked lang/canonical/work. Steward corrected 2×: 'we cannot use the extant canon as precedent.' Build to the CONSTITUTION (spec/graduation-spec schema), never to what a legacy canonical looks like; the legacy-witness principle applied to graduation method.", "valid_from": "2026-07-24", "valid_to": null, "confidence": 1.0, "source_file": "session-2026-07-24-evening-pending71-72-jurist-packages-ruled-reviewed72-73.md", "extracted_at": "2026-07-24"}
{"subject": "claude-code", "predicate": "drift-pattern", "object": "consequence-trace-one-level-shallow RECURRENCE — quoted REVIEWED-64 (the coordinate contract) in the PENDING-72 package yet failed to apply it to sections[], the very field I was proposing; sections[] IS one of the five line-carrying coordinate-contract families → needs a line_frame declaration. Jurist supplied the miss. Same shape as the jurist-package say-do-seam / consequence-trace disciplines I already carry — quoting a clause is not tracing its application.", "valid_from": "2026-07-24", "valid_to": null, "confidence": 1.0, "source_file": "session-2026-07-24-evening-pending71-72-jurist-packages-ruled-reviewed72-73.md", "extracted_at": "2026-07-24"}
{"subject": "chamber-library-spec", "predicate": "version", "object": "v2.6.0 (REVIEWED-72/74) — born-digital V-TEXT source-fidelity: markdown-smart reference (source-anchored writer-matched) + added-side MULTISET fabrication check (resolve_added; displacement cancels, two-sided glyph manifest count-scoped); 969/1046 reconciled (cross-converter independence relocated to periodic reader audit = declared data, specified-not-yet-built); wave UNBLOCKED; committed eaa38bf (github)", "valid_from": "2026-07-24", "valid_to": null, "confidence": 1.0, "source_file": "session-2026-07-24-evening-reviewed72-74-vtext-gate-landed-v2.6.0-wave-unblocked.md", "extracted_at": "2026-07-24"}
{"subject": "claude-code", "predicate": "drift-pattern-good-direction", "object": "measurement-refuted-the-jurist's-OWN-stated-premise — reading the substrate (ground_manifest.py, read-only) before theorizing showed the 287-token added delta was 279 DISPLACEMENT + 8 glyph, NOT 'injected content the injector enumerates' as the ruling stated; the injector enumerates markers on the LOST side. The jurist OWNED it ('the producer must know X is not evidence the producer records X'). The assert-from-derived-not-substrate drift-family run in its GOOD direction: substrate-first catches even a jurist's compressed framing. Reusable: read your own measurement before accepting ANY compressed premise, a ruling's included.", "valid_from": "2026-07-24", "valid_to": null, "confidence": 1.0, "source_file": "session-2026-07-24-evening-reviewed72-74-vtext-gate-landed-v2.6.0-wave-unblocked.md", "extracted_at": "2026-07-24"}