session 2026-07-14 wrap-amendment: block-discipline reframe (constitution-first, pull-based corpus) + Making substrate findings held; pulling thread revised
This commit is contained in:
@@ -28,3 +28,12 @@ The studium manifest (`~/_Dev/studium-engine/corpus/manifest.yaml`) carries **on
|
||||
|
||||
## The one true gate (still deferred)
|
||||
Levi's chapter-opening drop-caps are lost at the OCR-source level (printed book: "**T**HE title", "**H**AVE we", "**I** never"). Open question gating Levi ingestion: is supplying the initial a legitimate OCR-correction, or must it be flagged editor-supplied before entering the trusted substrate? See [[session-2026-06-18-arc-cv-finalized-operations-protocol-born]]. The pattern-finder's first TRUE pass on Position I waits on this. Language discipline here connects to [[feedback-studium-engine-sixtus-v-collaboration]] and the engine's verbatim guarantee ([[reference-studium-engine-architectural-charter]]).
|
||||
|
||||
## Substrate-trustability findings 2026-07-14 — HELD for the Position-I engine phase (NOT active threads)
|
||||
Surfaced while verifying "is the Making substrate trustable for the engine?" Recorded HERE, against the Position-I block, per [[feedback-constitution-as-block-then-pull-based-corpus]] (hold in the block's tracker; address when the phase needs it) — deliberately NOT carried as open threads.
|
||||
- **Engine manifest = 6 Position-I sources** (Weil ×2, Musil, Arendt-Eichmann, Levi). Positions II–V + Cross-Sequence still sourced-not-ingested (unchanged). Camus *La chute* still absent from the manifest.
|
||||
- **Arendt *Eichmann* is DIRTY** (a live engine source): `cruft_total=2` under the current gate **+ ~4,712 unresolved EPUB `filepos`/`split` anchor-residue links** (broken internal nav + conversion residue); the 2026-07-12 footnote retro-verify flagged it DIRTY (`+1/-5`, footnote-glue tokens `brainlessness7`/`html_filepos998967`). Prose body is *nearly* verbatim; the residue is in link targets. **Needs a clean re-conversion (Docling) before it is trustable substrate.** Graduated before this was catchable.
|
||||
- **`audit_cruft` blind spot** — counts 2 where there are ~4,712 `filepos`/`split` residue anchors: the cruft gate does not recognize this residue class (kin to the `md_image`/`svg_raw` gaps). A gate gap to fix when Position-I is the active block.
|
||||
- **REVIEWED-57's V-TEXT §6 sweep never ran** (no result file — only the Loeb V-DSL map exists) → the born-digital substrate is **verbatim-uncertified as a class**. Incidental evidence only: Weil-*gravity* + Musil CLEAN via the 07-12 footnote retro-verify; Weil-*Enracinement* re-anchored clean (P1) but unswept.
|
||||
- **Levi = OCR (V-SCAN)** — the body-conservation gate **ABSTAINS** (no ground truth), so it can never be gate-certified verbatim; and the **drop-cap gate** above was NOT confirmed resolved, yet Levi is in the manifest. Confirm when Position-I opens.
|
||||
- **When Position I becomes the active engine phase:** run the REVIEWED-57 §6 V-TEXT sweep over these sources (gate now wired + fixed 2026-07-14, `dbcdcc0`), re-convert Eichmann clean, settle the Levi drop-cap gate. **Until then: held, not active.**
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user