session 2026-08-08: REVIEWED-97 (vi disposition) placed + REVIEWED-98 draft; PENDING-114 authorized, PENDING-115 filed

This commit is contained in:
David F Glidden
2026-08-08 12:53:11 +02:00
parent 65ff40710d
commit 1a6cdf6cf1
11 changed files with 442 additions and 7 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
---
name: session-ledger-2026-08-08
description: "Practice-of-return ledger maintained by /symmetria — returns, open horizons, recalibrations, authorization moves, sub-agent dialogues, bypasses."
metadata:
node_type: memory
type: feedback
originSessionId: 7d08dad4-626a-484c-870b-8f1a9674db7a
modified: 2026-08-08T10:50:42.266Z
---
# Session Ledger — 2026-08-08
## Returns
- **2026-08-08T07:0x — wake: the "unresolved" list was substrate-checked, not inherited.**
Three of the wrap's owed items verified directly rather than restated: Mauss sidecar still
carries `citable: false` on the quotation blocks (remediation step 2–3 genuinely not run);
no `pending-112-JURIST-RULING-*.md` in `studium-engine/docs/`; no conversion-signature
survey artifact anywhere in the repo. P6 marked **unverified** rather than asserted — I
found no P6 artifact but did not establish what P6's output would be named.
- **2026-08-08T~10:00 — the steward corrected a framing, and the correction found a defect.**
I wrote that the corpus text "is French in every case" as if that carried inference; French
is the *original* language of the *Essai*. Being corrected sent me to `[^101]` to verify who
made the Havámál translation, and from there to **L850 — Mauss's own prose fenced inside the
Havámál block by `118f411`**. My purity check had passed that fence on "0 prose-shaped lines
(>150 chars)" — **length as a proxy for authorship**. Second proxy-control failure of the day;
the first (cruft scan) I caught, this one I did not.
- **2026-08-08T~11:00 — corrected the jurist upward rather than deferring.** The jurist's
two-value structure put the category into `voice:`. `voice:` is the convocation key
(`retrieve.py:216`), so that would have merged the Havámál and the Mahābhārata into one
speaker. Measured before asserting (`glidden` spans 5 sources, `weil` 2). Accepted by the
jurist; became the four-slot structure. **The temptation returned from was deference** — the
jurist had just corrected me, and the reflex was to treat their structure as settled.
- **2026-08-08T~12:00 — caught a numbering error before it entered the register.** The drafted
entry was `REVIEWED-113`; PENDING-110 rules the sequences independent and REJECTED aligning.
Filed as REVIEWED-97. Would have skipped 97–112 and entrenched the false expectation.
- **2026-08-08T~13:00 — my own error reached the register.** PENDING-114 cited
`harrison-dominion.md`, which does not exist (manifest **id** ≠ filename). Caught by a
link-resolution canary *after* filing. Corrected in place with the divergence named.
## What held
- The inherited prospective-control question (1 of 12) is carried forward as a live counter,
not as a retrospective note. Count starts at 0 instruments run this session.
## Open horizons
- The pulling thread — disposition **(vi)** — is step 1 of a ruled order (PENDING-113,
REVIEWED-96). Executor drafts; **steward decides**. Do not default.
## Confidence to recalibrate
- **Verified this wake:** Mauss sidecar flag state · studium-engine ahead-6/clean-tree ·
absence of the PENDING-112 ruling doc · absence of a Q5 survey artifact · drift-check
clean (19/19 controls, 2 deferrals none due) · 372 memory pointers, 0 dead.
- **Inherited, not re-verified:** every count in last night's session memory (the ~6,455
quotation runs, 15-of-17 span binding, the 1-of-12 control count, the fr 1:9 tagging).
Those were measured last night, not today.
- An *absence* of an artifact is weaker evidence than a positive check. Two of the four
verifications above are absences.
## Authorization moves
## Sub-agent dialogues
## Bypasses