record(session): supersede the ledger's "did not commit or push" line
True when written, false once the steward authorized the push. Superseded explicitly rather than overwritten, per the memory discipline: an unmarked correction leaves two live versions and no way to tell which is current. Also records the divergence between steward and jurist on gitea — the jurist advised github only, without having seen the steward's instruction naming gitea. Steward authority is Final; the divergence is named, not quietly resolved. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PJM5fwqp456LDGzqiZXsgu
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
bf07f1ab9b
commit
2f6964cf0e
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ metadata:
|
||||
- 2026-09-12T — **REFUSED a constitutional edit on a jurist instruction.** The jurist's *"one line at the site"* means editing `~/CLAUDE.md`. Constraint 1 and the unconditional-escalate list reserve that to the steward, and the banked note says in terms that **a jurist sign-off does not authorize one**. ⚠ **The clause that made this sharpest was placed in the very commit under examination** (`771bec6`): *contamination runs inbound through this document's own vocabulary; ask what the act is, not what it is called.* The act was amending the constitution on a non-steward's say-so, however good the reason. Line drafted and handed to the steward; **not written.** First live exercise of that clause, less than a day after it landed.
|
||||
- 2026-09-12T — **FILED PENDING-185** `[HARDENING]` to `~/dotfiles/PENDING.md` (the real path; the `~` entry is a symlink). Authorized route: the taxonomy makes filing *itself* the proposal. Placement design-gated by the jurist — new item, not an amendment, on PENDING-145's suppression hazard. Verified: heading parses at col 0 (1 occurrence), no indented variant, two negative controls at 0, `before == after[:len]` true, drift check still 65/65.
|
||||
- 2026-09-12T — **Edited `FOOL-SEED-RULE.md` prose adjacent to a machine-read marker, and logged it in the document's own §7 audit trail** as that document requires of every post-beacon edit. ⚠ **Deliberately did NOT strike the stale §6 bullet** — its plain reading is now false, but it is pre-registration record and its worth is being what was claimed before the beacon. Corrected by adjacent note instead. Verified: marker byte-intact across all five lines, note at col 0, table columns consistent, §6 bullet unaltered.
|
||||
- 2026-09-12T — **Did not commit or push.** The steward has not asked; yesterday's commit of his CLAUDE.md edit was on explicit instruction and does not generalise.
|
||||
- 2026-09-12T — **Did not commit or push until asked** — then did, on explicit steward authorization naming `gitea`. ⚠ **SUPERSEDES this line as first written** (*"The steward has not asked"*), which became false the moment he did; recorded by supersession rather than overwritten, so the sequence stays legible. Both remotes now at `bf07f1a`, **verified by `ls-remote` against local HEAD, not by push exit code**; `gitea` closed 57 commits (`324cf77`→`bf07f1a`) after eight days stale. ⚠ **The jurist advised `github` only**, holding `gitea` for its own moment — it was writing without having seen the steward's instruction, which named `gitea` explicitly. Steward authority is Final under the taxonomy; the divergence is named here rather than quietly resolved.
|
||||
|
||||
## Sub-agent dialogues
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user