chore(memory): Basic Memory trial begins — sync normalization baseline (283 files)
Basic Memory v0.21.6 first sync over the live memory dir (steward-authorized live-dir trial, Option A 2026-06-06): adds permalink: to frontmatter, refolds long YAML description lines, strips final newlines. Bodies untouched — verified via full diff classification. From this commit forward, any diff in claude/memory shows only what Basic Memory or the session writes. Trial design: MemPalace untouched as incumbent; git status check on this dir at every wrap; end-of-day evaluation (recall quality, sync robustness, rebuild-from-files, malformed-file behavior). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 4.8
parent
161fad7ae2
commit
3f9a89b00c
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
permalink: claude-memory/feedback-scss-file-organization-not-kitchen-sink
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: SCSS file organization — don't kitchen-sink into the most recently-touched file
|
||||
description: Steward caught 2026-04-28 evening — across the day's apparatus work I added .preface, .section-break, .sequence-marker, and was about to add .sequence-index-* styles all to `_sidenotes.scss` because that's the file I had been editing. The file's own header declared its scope as §XII + §XII.b. I was violating that declared scope by aggregation. Steward verbatim: *"why in sidenotes.scss?"*
|
||||
@@ -35,4 +39,4 @@ Today's recovery: split `_sidenotes.scss` into `_preface.scss`, `_section-break.
|
||||
|
||||
- Cousin: `feedback-blame-the-exotic-before-checking-the-boring` (2026-04-28) — same proximity-bias / path-of-least-resistance shape, different domain.
|
||||
- Cousin: feedback-canonical-workstream-tracker-discipline (2026-04-26) — also a file-organization discipline (canonical trackers, not parallel siblings).
|
||||
- Sibling: the `would-Alexander-do-it?` test (2026-04-27) — *one pattern at a time*; bulk-scaffold instinct fights principled placement.
|
||||
- Sibling: the `would-Alexander-do-it?` test (2026-04-27) — *one pattern at a time*; bulk-scaffold instinct fights principled placement.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user