chore(memory): Basic Memory trial begins — sync normalization baseline (283 files)

Basic Memory v0.21.6 first sync over the live memory dir (steward-authorized
live-dir trial, Option A 2026-06-06): adds permalink: to frontmatter, refolds
long YAML description lines, strips final newlines. Bodies untouched —
verified via full diff classification. From this commit forward, any diff in
claude/memory shows only what Basic Memory or the session writes.

Trial design: MemPalace untouched as incumbent; git status check on this dir
at every wrap; end-of-day evaluation (recall quality, sync robustness,
rebuild-from-files, malformed-file behavior).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
David F Glidden
2026-06-06 09:52:17 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.8
parent 161fad7ae2
commit 3f9a89b00c
283 changed files with 2055 additions and 620 deletions
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
---
permalink: claude-memory/feedback-scss-file-organization-not-kitchen-sink
---
---
name: SCSS file organization — don't kitchen-sink into the most recently-touched file
description: Steward caught 2026-04-28 evening — across the day's apparatus work I added .preface, .section-break, .sequence-marker, and was about to add .sequence-index-* styles all to `_sidenotes.scss` because that's the file I had been editing. The file's own header declared its scope as §XII + §XII.b. I was violating that declared scope by aggregation. Steward verbatim: *"why in sidenotes.scss?"*
@@ -35,4 +39,4 @@ Today's recovery: split `_sidenotes.scss` into `_preface.scss`, `_section-break.
- Cousin: `feedback-blame-the-exotic-before-checking-the-boring` (2026-04-28) — same proximity-bias / path-of-least-resistance shape, different domain.
- Cousin: feedback-canonical-workstream-tracker-discipline (2026-04-26) — also a file-organization discipline (canonical trackers, not parallel siblings).
- Sibling: the `would-Alexander-do-it?` test (2026-04-27) — *one pattern at a time*; bulk-scaffold instinct fights principled placement.
- Sibling: the `would-Alexander-do-it?` test (2026-04-27) — *one pattern at a time*; bulk-scaffold instinct fights principled placement.