chore(memory): Basic Memory trial begins — sync normalization baseline (283 files)
Basic Memory v0.21.6 first sync over the live memory dir (steward-authorized live-dir trial, Option A 2026-06-06): adds permalink: to frontmatter, refolds long YAML description lines, strips final newlines. Bodies untouched — verified via full diff classification. From this commit forward, any diff in claude/memory shows only what Basic Memory or the session writes. Trial design: MemPalace untouched as incumbent; git status check on this dir at every wrap; end-of-day evaluation (recall quality, sync robustness, rebuild-from-files, malformed-file behavior). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 4.8
parent
161fad7ae2
commit
3f9a89b00c
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
permalink: claude-memory/observer-problem-state
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: Observer Problem inquiry state
|
||||
description: External Auditor review received (2026-04-08), three challenges land (Absorption Trap, Aesthetic of Rigor, Proceed with Annotations), review deliberately NOT taxonomized. Next: dialogue trial.
|
||||
@@ -48,4 +52,4 @@ Five challenges raised. Jurist assessed three as landing:
|
||||
|
||||
**Why:** The architecture addressed AI-side failure modes but not human-side. The External Auditor's review confirmed the risk is real and operative — the system's sophistication is itself a failure mode.
|
||||
|
||||
**How to apply:** All subsequent mechanism proposals must be assessed against CD-03 §IV.4 AND the Absorption Trap (does this proposal domesticate the critique it claims to address?). The dialogue trial is the next concrete deliverable.
|
||||
**How to apply:** All subsequent mechanism proposals must be assessed against CD-03 §IV.4 AND the Absorption Trap (does this proposal domesticate the critique it claims to address?). The dialogue trial is the next concrete deliverable.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user