chore(memory): Basic Memory trial begins — sync normalization baseline (283 files)
Basic Memory v0.21.6 first sync over the live memory dir (steward-authorized live-dir trial, Option A 2026-06-06): adds permalink: to frontmatter, refolds long YAML description lines, strips final newlines. Bodies untouched — verified via full diff classification. From this commit forward, any diff in claude/memory shows only what Basic Memory or the session writes. Trial design: MemPalace untouched as incumbent; git status check on this dir at every wrap; end-of-day evaluation (recall quality, sync robustness, rebuild-from-files, malformed-file behavior). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 4.8
parent
161fad7ae2
commit
3f9a89b00c
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
permalink: claude-memory/project-gloss-vs-commentary-distinction
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: Gloss vs Readings as distinct ARC content types — distinction discovered 2026-05-13, name locked 2026-05-14
|
||||
description: The Brown piece "The Obligating Word" (committed `82c2ba1` as class:gloss) is structurally Readings, not Gloss. Diagnostic: gloss illuminates a passage (passage = subject); a Reading composes its account of a work (work = subject, passages = evidence). Steward chose name "Readings" (plural) over "Commentary" — register family matches Glimpse/Fragment/Observation; the plural admits "these are my readings, not the readings." Genette's *Seuils* ratifies the structural frontier (paratexte vs métatexte; "forme latérale de la critique"). Remaining work: spec amendment + Brown post reclassification.
|
||||
@@ -136,4 +140,4 @@ The structural decision and the naming are settled. Outstanding:
|
||||
- **Brown post reclassification**: `content/posts/2026-05-09-the-obligating-word.md` from `class: gloss` → `class: readings` once spec lands
|
||||
- **Lex-method recognition cluster for Readings apparatus** across source-types — when the steward wants to gather instances
|
||||
|
||||
The Borges line ("forme latérale de la critique") and Genette's framework belong in the spec amendment as the lineage anchor. Readings is recovery, not invention.
|
||||
The Borges line ("forme latérale de la critique") and Genette's framework belong in the spec amendment as the lineage anchor. Readings is recovery, not invention.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user