chore(memory): Basic Memory trial begins — sync normalization baseline (283 files)

Basic Memory v0.21.6 first sync over the live memory dir (steward-authorized
live-dir trial, Option A 2026-06-06): adds permalink: to frontmatter, refolds
long YAML description lines, strips final newlines. Bodies untouched —
verified via full diff classification. From this commit forward, any diff in
claude/memory shows only what Basic Memory or the session writes.

Trial design: MemPalace untouched as incumbent; git status check on this dir
at every wrap; end-of-day evaluation (recall quality, sync robustness,
rebuild-from-files, malformed-file behavior).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
David F Glidden
2026-06-06 09:52:17 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.8
parent 161fad7ae2
commit 3f9a89b00c
283 changed files with 2055 additions and 620 deletions
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
---
permalink: claude-memory/project-gloss-vs-commentary-distinction
---
---
name: Gloss vs Readings as distinct ARC content types — distinction discovered 2026-05-13, name locked 2026-05-14
description: The Brown piece "The Obligating Word" (committed `82c2ba1` as class:gloss) is structurally Readings, not Gloss. Diagnostic: gloss illuminates a passage (passage = subject); a Reading composes its account of a work (work = subject, passages = evidence). Steward chose name "Readings" (plural) over "Commentary" — register family matches Glimpse/Fragment/Observation; the plural admits "these are my readings, not the readings." Genette's *Seuils* ratifies the structural frontier (paratexte vs métatexte; "forme latérale de la critique"). Remaining work: spec amendment + Brown post reclassification.
@@ -136,4 +140,4 @@ The structural decision and the naming are settled. Outstanding:
- **Brown post reclassification**: `content/posts/2026-05-09-the-obligating-word.md` from `class: gloss` → `class: readings` once spec lands
- **Lex-method recognition cluster for Readings apparatus** across source-types — when the steward wants to gather instances
The Borges line ("forme latérale de la critique") and Genette's framework belong in the spec amendment as the lineage anchor. Readings is recovery, not invention.
The Borges line ("forme latérale de la critique") and Genette's framework belong in the spec amendment as the lineage anchor. Readings is recovery, not invention.