chore(memory): Basic Memory trial begins — sync normalization baseline (283 files)

Basic Memory v0.21.6 first sync over the live memory dir (steward-authorized
live-dir trial, Option A 2026-06-06): adds permalink: to frontmatter, refolds
long YAML description lines, strips final newlines. Bodies untouched —
verified via full diff classification. From this commit forward, any diff in
claude/memory shows only what Basic Memory or the session writes.

Trial design: MemPalace untouched as incumbent; git status check on this dir
at every wrap; end-of-day evaluation (recall quality, sync robustness,
rebuild-from-files, malformed-file behavior).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
David F Glidden
2026-06-06 09:52:17 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.8
parent 161fad7ae2
commit 3f9a89b00c
283 changed files with 2055 additions and 620 deletions
@@ -1,9 +1,12 @@
---
name: mempalace-operational-stance-post-1526
description: Operational stance toward MemPalace going forward — proper-scope use for AI session continuity (diary + KG + handoffs), not corpus reading. Currently on local fork v3.3.5 + 3 PR #442 patches; failure modes in issue #1526 don't fire at working-memory scale. Decision triggers named for when to revisit. Replaces ambient anxiety about "non-official build" with explicit conditions.
description: Operational stance toward MemPalace going forward — proper-scope use
for AI session continuity (diary + KG + handoffs), not corpus reading. Currently
on local fork v3.3.5 + 3 PR
metadata:
type: project
originSessionId: 8b47c0eb-d396-43d5-98eb-7623e6f04357
permalink: claude-memory/project-mempalace-operational-stance-2026-05-16
---
# MemPalace operational stance (post-issue-#1526)
@@ -81,4 +84,4 @@ The /wake-up procedure's existing mempalace upgrade check (step 2.e) surfaces up
The strategic question — *"what to do about MemPalace going forward?"* — is settled. MemPalace is the steward's working-memory layer; the Studium Engine handles corpus. The local fork is operational and adequate for working memory; failure modes don't apply at that scale; upgrade when a trigger fires. The discipline is *named conditions for action, not ambient anxiety about non-officialness*.
If future-Claude finds the steward anxious again about the "non-official build," the right move is to re-state the decision-trigger framing, not to relitigate the strategic question.
If future-Claude finds the steward anxious again about the "non-official build," the right move is to re-state the decision-trigger framing, not to relitigate the strategic question.