chore(memory): Basic Memory trial begins — sync normalization baseline (283 files)

Basic Memory v0.21.6 first sync over the live memory dir (steward-authorized
live-dir trial, Option A 2026-06-06): adds permalink: to frontmatter, refolds
long YAML description lines, strips final newlines. Bodies untouched —
verified via full diff classification. From this commit forward, any diff in
claude/memory shows only what Basic Memory or the session writes.

Trial design: MemPalace untouched as incumbent; git status check on this dir
at every wrap; end-of-day evaluation (recall quality, sync robustness,
rebuild-from-files, malformed-file behavior).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
David F Glidden
2026-06-06 09:52:17 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.8
parent 161fad7ae2
commit 3f9a89b00c
283 changed files with 2055 additions and 620 deletions
+7 -3
View File
@@ -1,10 +1,14 @@
---
name: skill-harvest-register-proposed-skills-awaiting-steward-authorization
description: "Standing register of skill create/patch/retire proposals surfaced by /wrap-up §1.6, awaiting steward authorization. The governed analog of PENDING.md, turned on our own tooling — propose → authorize → build → record. Surfaced every wake via this MEMORY entry."
metadata:
description: Standing register of skill create/patch/retire proposals surfaced by
/wrap-up §1.6, awaiting steward authorization. The governed analog of PENDING.md,
turned on our own tooling — propose → authorize → build → record. Surfaced every
wake via this MEMORY entry.
metadata:
node_type: memory
type: reference
originSessionId: a8eb1d46-314e-4545-a133-f747c69ad5b4
permalink: claude-memory/skill-harvest-register
---
# Skill-harvest register
@@ -50,4 +54,4 @@ The single place proposed skills live so they don't evaporate between sessions.
---
*Discipline reminder: "no harvest" is a valid outcome; do not manufacture proposals to fill the table (the inverse of Hermes's autonomous self-write). The yardstick is the steward's: did the steward have to re-explain something a skill could have carried?*
*Discipline reminder: "no harvest" is a valid outcome; do not manufacture proposals to fill the table (the inverse of Hermes's autonomous self-write). The yardstick is the steward's: did the steward have to re-explain something a skill could have carried?*