session 2026-07-18: PENDING-62 lodged+ratified (REVIEWED-62 applied — 2b FIXes; wiring build cleared); S1 wrap
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: session-ledger-2026-07-18
|
||||
description: "Practice-of-return ledger maintained by /symmetria — returns, open horizons, recalibrations, authorization moves, sub-agent dialogues, bypasses."
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
node_type: memory
|
||||
type: feedback
|
||||
originSessionId: e849c5f3-932e-4ef6-bbd8-be8db9628583
|
||||
modified: 2026-07-18T12:00:17.965Z
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Session Ledger — 2026-07-18
|
||||
|
||||
## Returns
|
||||
|
||||
## Open horizons
|
||||
|
||||
- 2026-07-18T08:05 — Inherited from wrap: three-session day (steward-requested). Session 1 = FIX-A (item-(f) seam, GATES the build) + FIX-B (app[] naming) as grounded editor-gate briefs; Session 2 = sidecar_gate() build test-first; Session 3 = first V-DSL exercise on the 6 CLEAN small Loeb → residual-(b) → REVIEWED-58.
|
||||
- 2026-07-18T08:05 — Literal question held (do not answer before Session 3): does the per-field-gated wiring earn its keep when exercised, or does exercising surface a gap the paper rulings couldn't?
|
||||
- 2026-07-18T08:05 — Drift-shape to hold today: assert-"X is in Y" → read Y (yesterday's say/do gap). Session 1's first move — locating item (f) — is exactly this claim-shape.
|
||||
- 2026-07-18T08:05 — No Symmetria ledger was filed 2026-07-17; mood signal reconstructed from the session file only.
|
||||
|
||||
## Confidence to recalibrate
|
||||
|
||||
## Authorization moves
|
||||
|
||||
- 2026-07-18T08:25 — PENDING-62 lodged (paired FIX-A/FIX-B, jurist-classed FIX against a REVIEWED). Brief committed `e36f561`, pushed both remotes. Edits NOT applied — await jurist light editor-gate + REVIEWED-62. FIX-A gates the build.
|
||||
- 2026-07-18T08:25 — Substrate finding surfaced, not silently fixed: PENDING-58 operative text internal tension (line 38 `sections` under Trusted vs line 44 produced-without-proof); resolution proposed per Fork-1 credit set, flagged as gate question 2.
|
||||
- 2026-07-18T08:25 — Yesterday's drift-shape held: the "tool emits five kinds" claim grounded in the code body (lines 148–231), not the docstring (which still shows two in its cue-map).
|
||||
- 2026-07-18T~09:00 — Editor-gate PASSED (1 correction: A2 states sections' disposition — applied); REVIEWED-62 FILED by steward mid-turn (verified at ~/REVIEWED.md:580 before acting). Edit-set applied: 16 hunks, each mapped to a named edit; canonical (f) byte-identical ×4 placements; commit `6d6268a` tagged REVIEWED-62, both remotes. **Session 1 complete — the build gate is CLEARED.**
|
||||
- 2026-07-18T~09:00 — Two executor judgments beyond the brief's literal list, both flagged in the report: (1) GROUNDED-IN attestation added to pre-hook Doc 1 (hook-required to edit at all); (2) §4 landing-table row recording B3's kinds (the table exists to record FIX-lane landings "in the open").
|
||||
- 2026-07-18T~09:00 — Jurist named their own 07-16 miss + the method lesson: "a gate that passes a document and a build that has to implement it are different tests." Wrap-harvest candidate.
|
||||
- 2026-07-18T~09:00 — Residual noted, NOT acted on (outside gated set): Doc 1 line-45 parenthetical "(the honest label `app[]` gets…)" still uses the pre-FIX-B ambiguous token; disambiguated by the Naming note, but a candidate micro-edit if the steward wants it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Sub-agent dialogues
|
||||
|
||||
## Bypasses
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user