[FIX] 'abandonment' -> 'retirement' in the fool's doctrine; §6 was false as of today

The jurist owned this mismatch and scheduled it after the beacon so no edit would
touch the filed rule before it fired. It fired at 12:00Z; this is that harmonization.
v2 §4 step 3 said "Abandonment criterion" while §10 defined RETIREMENT.

Censused before editing rather than sed'd. All 24 abandon* occurrences in the fool
tree were counted and read in context: 9 were doctrine and changed; 13 in the trial-09
family were LEFT — that is the word §6 of the trial design owns, in its own sense about
the jester form, and a blanket replace would have silently collided the two meanings it
was supposed to separate. 1 in input-dependence-01 is ordinary English about the void of
a numbering. 1 in FOOL-BONES is the dated record of what was owed.

Prior wording preserved in place at every changed site. REVIEWED-125 ruled on the v2
draft's text; an untraceable edit drifts a ruling's subject away from its artifact, which
is the PENDING-82/86 hazard this item's own record already notes recurring inside a
ruling. The criterion is unchanged — only the word naming it.

Separately, found while in the file: §6 "What has NOT happened" asserted the pulse had
not been fetched and no bones derived. Both went false at 12:00Z today. Marked superseded
in part, bullets struck rather than deleted since they are the pre-registration record,
and pointed at FOOL-BONES for current state. A governance doc asserting stale current
state is what Constraint 4 forbids.

New §7 logs every post-beacon edit to the filed rule, so "filed and pushed before the
beacon" stays auditable instead of eroding one silent correction at a time. Its claim
that §1/§2/§2a/§3/§5/§5a are untouched was verified by reading the diff hunks against
the pre-edit section map, not asserted.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J6hZXNYSxEfZseBGTni4sf

claude/governance/fool/BUDDY-PATTERN-jurist-draft-v2-2026-08-22.md

@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ Each step committed and pushed before the next begins.
 
 1. Perception axes ratified by the steward (§5).
 2. Seed derivation rule filed, naming a **future** timestamp (§6).
-3. Abandonment criterion filed (§10).
+3. Retirement criterion filed (§10).
 4. Regeneration criterion filed (§10).
 5. Timestamp passes; seed computed; bones derived.
 6. Soul generated once from the bones (§7).
@@ -116,6 +116,22 @@ Each step committed and pushed before the next begins.
 Steps 1–4 complete and pushed **before** step 5. Axes chosen after the seed is
 known, or with a fool in hand, smuggle the selection one level up.
 
+⚠ **`[FIX]` 2026-08-25 — step 3 read *"Abandonment criterion"* until today.** §10 has
+always defined **RETIREMENT**; the jurist ruled the fool's own doctrine should carry one
+word with one meaning (recorded in `seed/FOOL-SEED-RULE.md` §5b), and scheduled the
+harmonization **after** the beacon so no edit touched the filed rule before it fired. It
+fired 2026-08-25T12:00:00Z; this is that harmonization. **The criterion itself is
+unchanged — only the word naming it.**
+
+*Abandonment* is deliberately left standing where **§6 of the trial-09 design** owns it:
+a different criterion, about the jester form, assessed across trial 09 and one frontier
+replication. Thirteen occurrences there were censused and left untouched.
+
+⚠ **The prior wording is recorded here rather than silently replaced.** REVIEWED-125
+ruled on this document's text. An edit that leaves no trace makes the ruling's subject
+drift from the artifact it ruled on — the hazard PENDING-82 / PENDING-86 already track,
+and which this very item's record notes recurring *inside* a ruling.
+
 ## 5 · Perception axes — five, ratified by the steward
 
 Five axes, 0–100. Each is something the fool could be **blind to**. The steward
@@ -402,8 +418,9 @@ negligible cost. Do not build for it now; do not preclude it.
 1. Spec document in the governance tree, provenance header naming this v2 draft
    and what was changed.
 2. Status-line availability confirmed (§8a) **before** §8 is implemented.
-3. Filed axes, seed rule (both components, §6), abandonment and regeneration
+3. Filed axes, seed rule (both components, §6), retirement and regeneration
    criteria — committed and pushed **before** the beacon timestamp.
+   *(`[FIX]` 2026-08-25: read "abandonment" until today — see the note under §4.)*
 4. Derivation implementation: deterministic, fresh-overrides-stored, no reroll
    path, **no salt from any reference implementation.**
 5. Post-derivation record per §6a, in a single commit: raw beacon value, seed