From 58b7409633d45a246c96b519eb45668065ee8803 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David F Glidden Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2026 13:00:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] PENDING-139 re-measured: leg (A) is repaired, leg (B) is live MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The re-measurement lived only in commit 12ca031s message while the item read as live on both legs — so the next ruling on it would have authorized repairing a repaired defect. That is this weeks own finding sitting on the next item due for a ruling. Additive only: nothing above the note is altered, so this is not the placed-record normalization REVIEWED-132 §6 reserves to a dated steward act. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X3L79vgAnt1x2kxvf23Qt7 --- PENDING.md | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/PENDING.md b/PENDING.md index a447425..7eb5fee 100644 --- a/PENDING.md +++ b/PENDING.md @@ -1692,6 +1692,22 @@ So **PENDING-138 and this entry are worded to avoid the bare uppercase token**, **Files affected:** `~/dotfiles/scripts/governance-drift-check.py` — `RE_HEAD`, `RE_BUILT`, the register and built-vs-ruled checks, and their controls. +⚠ **RE-MEASURED 2026-09-06 — ADDITIVE NOTE, NOTHING ABOVE IS REWRITTEN.** The item's text stands as filed and +was true when measured. Against the substrate today the two legs have diverged and the item **must not be ruled +as filed**: +- **Leg (A) — REPAIRED.** `RE_HEAD_LINE` is `^#{2,3}\s+(.*)$`, so a `###`-level amendment heading IS seen and + classifies `id+marker`, identically to `##`. Verified by running `_classify` on both forms. **Ruling (A) as + filed would authorize repairing a repaired defect.** +- **Leg (B) — STILL LIVE.** `RE_BUILT = re.compile(r"\bBUILT\b")` at `governance-drift-check.py:774` fires on + `NOT BUILT`, `NOT YET BUILT` and `the mechanism is NOT BUILT`. Verified by running the pattern on each. +- ⚠ The `·` form the item also names is **worse than unseen**: it parses to `compound` with the identifier + mangled to a bare `REVIEWED`. Avoiding it is right; the stated reason is half-stale. + +⚠ Filed here rather than left in commit `12ca031`'s message, per +[[feedback-a-dated-measurement-is-not-a-status]] — a re-measurement that lives only in a commit message is the +defect this note exists to prevent, one layer along. **Additive only:** no line above is altered, so this is not +the placed-record normalization REVIEWED-132 §6 reserves to a dated steward act. + **Awaiting:** Steward authorization. ⚠ Until then the register is worded around the defect (disclosed above), so the check's silence on it is an accommodation and not a pass. ---