session 2026-07-04: Chamber spec v2.0 ratified+shipped (a10d6bf); new session memory + ledger + skill-harvest (/spec-amendment build-ready, wrap-up §4.a patch)

claude/memory/MEMORY.md

@@ -51,7 +51,10 @@ permalink: claude-memory/memory
 - [Be (laundromat)](project-be-laundromat.md) — canonical workstream tracker established 2026-06-08 (Seb-relay of locked decisions). Be = Skemantix startup (Seb+David) funding CapableMind's funding-ladder; **bridge, not venture**. Decisions LOCKED: entity/exit (CapableMind decoupled, grant-funded), pricing (Living $12.99/mo · Archive $69.99/yr · Memorial $49.99/yr · Renovate ~$199 · $8.99 floor), CF Self-Serve Agency + versioned-template-package infra. **a11y gate MERGED (Pat 100/100/100).** Pre-revenue: the WTP gate = renovate Pat → charge her. **Discipline: stop adding spec until the gate clears → nothing for executor on be until then.** Repo @ `f43a0fd`.
 
 ## Active Session
-- [Session 2026-07-03 — doctrine phase complete; Phase 2 next](session-2026-07-03-doctrine-phase-complete-phase2-next.md) — **A very long session that closed the entire DOCTRINE PHASE of the chamber-library spec revision.** Morning: built `audit_corpus.py` + the corpus quality MAP (delivered yesterday's thread). Then steward challenged the framing → **tool-fleet audit (3 agents) → WAVE 0**: fixed all 8 blocking tool bugs test-first (`scripts/test_tools.py`, 21 assertions; graduation gate was HALF-MISSING; normalize_ocr guard off in common case; etc.), retired 6 dead tools, **committed `f9cbb8e`+`1c88650`**; record `_curation/tool-fleet-compliance-2026-07-03.md`. Then **prior-art scans (3 agents)**: ~70% of our spec re-derives **TEI + CTS + Standard Ebooks + W3C PROV + TEI-ODD** — adopt their marked ground; watch **Seck arXiv 2604.10658** (independent governance convergence, added to landscape-register). Then **the FULL spec revision RULED by the jurist** (via steward relay): gaps 1-8, generative principle, amendment process (RFC-supersession + change-class + semver), the three questions (A/B/C), and §III citation posture — **ALL RATIFIED**. Unifying insight: gaps 2+3+item-8 = ONE addressing substrate. Then **THE LOEB SUBSTRATE REFRAME** (steward: "look at the DSL directly" — decisive): I'd told the jurist 74% of the corpus was anchorless; the SOURCE inverted it — Stephanus/Bekker/book+line anchors are ALL in `loeb.dsl`, **FLATTENED by extraction** (`extract_loeb_dsl.py:47`). Per-genre audit (re-verified vs source): **>99% of ~2,041 works carry a recoverable anchor**; 35,261 division-carrying `%` lines discarded; residual = single-digit fragments. §III re-ruled → cite the Loeb by RECOVERED canonical anchor (CTS edition-as-identity); the structured-but-unanchored extension VOIDED (dormant only). **Full-run scope decided:** current 952 = Tier 1; rebuild-anyway → run the FULL DSL (2,041 works); fence discharges dilution. Installed wordfreq (venvs) + jsonschema. Disambiguation map durable: `docs/loeb-anchor-audit-and-disambiguation-map-2026-07-03.md`. **THE ARC:** yesterday's despair ("clutching sand") → a marked, finite plan (ground → instruments → corpus → fence). **MY drift-of-the-session (jurist-elevated to standing practice): trusted a derived-artifact/regex over the SOURCE 3× — the steward twice sent me to the substrate and was right.** **PULLING THREAD: Phase 2 — draft `chamber-library-specification.md` v2.0 (superseding, semver-MAJOR) + the generative validator, BEGINNING with a clean END-TO-END READ of the current spec (deliberately NOT read today — I worked from audits), then §III the CTS addressing spine.** Everything in PENDING-46. Q: does the real spec text hold anything the day's audits missed/collide-with, before v2.0 is drafted against my model rather than the text?
+- [Session 2026-07-03→04 — Chamber Library spec v2.0 RATIFIED, supersedes v1; corpus stress-test next](session-2026-07-04-chamber-library-v2-ratified.md) — **Phase 2 executed end-to-end across midnight: drafted `chamber-library-specification.md` v2.0 SPINE-FIRST (§III→II→V→IV→VI→VII→IX→Tiering&Fence→Governance&Amendment), each section jurist-editor-gated in a live executor↔jurist↔steward relay, assembled self-contained, RATIFIED (jurist whole-draft read + steward), committed+pushed `a10d6bf` SUPERSEDING v1** (v1 archived `chamber-library-specification-v1.0.md`, obsolete banner, immutable; v2.0 now canonical). Key doctrine: **§III portability test** (locator admitted iff resolves same across every edition — Stephanus/Bekker ARE page-numbers but portable; test on property not shape; caught the load-bearing v1 self-contradiction on my first real read of the spec); **§II** anchor inline REQUIRED + break-normalization constitutional + sectionless-attestation; **§V** mandatory W3C-PROV record + content/process gate split + apparatus anchored-to-location (Finding-4); **§IV** edition-identity/CTS-URN; **§VII** declared-list-IS-the-gate + locator registry + **two-layer order-blindness resolution** (cleaning=order-sensitive/anchor-bound; conversion-OCR=eyeball-ceiling); **§Tiering&Fence** governability tiers; **§Governance&Amendment** RFC-supersession+change-class+semver, **gap-7 JOINTLY CO-RATIFIED**. First **FIX-class errata** exercised. **Source-not-derived became the drafting method** (opened every section with a substrate check; caught my OWN "ratified amendment process" overclaim mid-draft). Telos: jurist's Alexander (grew-through-real-texture) + Harrison (Tier-3 = not letting living overwrite the dead) framing of what the doctrine IS. **PULLING THREAD: the CORPUS STRESS-TEST — bring ~2,041 works to v2.0 spec in the jurist's ratified DEPENDENCY ORDER** (source-matching reliability FIRST → order-sensitivity via inject-known-bad → disambiguation edges), small-batch-before-full, with a **PRE-REGISTRATION doc** (ruling-thresholds written before seeing data) as the first artifact; NOT a single-perspective pass. Q: does the ~1% source-match false-positive hold under INDEPENDENT test (2nd matcher / human ground-truth, not self-agreement) — or optimistic like the "74% anchorless" premise was?
+
+## Archived (2026-07-04 — Chamber v2.0 ratified)
+- [Session 2026-07-03 — doctrine phase complete; Phase 2 next](session-2026-07-03-doctrine-phase-complete-phase2-next.md) — closed the DOCTRINE PHASE of the chamber-library spec revision: `audit_corpus.py` + corpus quality map; tool-fleet audit → WAVE 0 (8 fixes test-first, `f9cbb8e`+`1c88650`); prior-art scans (spec re-derives TEI+CTS+Standard-Ebooks+PROV+ODD; watch Seck 2604.10658); FULL spec revision RULED (gaps 1-8, generative principle, amendment process, three questions — all ratified); THE LOEB REFRAME (steward "look at the DSL" → Stephanus/Bekker anchors present, flattened by extraction; >99% anchored; §III cite-by-recovered-anchor). Drift: trusted derived-artifact over source 3× → jurist standing practice. Fed directly into this session's Phase-2 execution.
 
 ## Archived (2026-07-03 — doctrine phase complete)
 - [Session 2026-07-02 evening — Sennett + Family-D + corpus standard & method](session-2026-07-02-evening-corpus-standard-and-the-method.md) — Graduated Sennett *The Craftsman* (294 endnotes recovered); built the Family-D footnote handler (`clean_epub_residue.py`); committed `10cff59`; PENDING-45. Corpus census → steward named the STANDARD (verified-not-just-graduated; fence engine to green) + METHOD (measure-whole-first → map → remediate-by-defect-class in finite waves). Led directly into 2026-07-03's map + the full spec-revision doctrine phase.