session 2026-08-07 night: REVIEWED-87 amendment + REVIEWED-95/96 placed, PENDING-113 lodged (quoted voices ruled)

REVIEWED.md

@@ -1016,4 +1016,37 @@ nested inside a genuine delimiter pair separates correctly
 **Date:** 2026-08-06
 **Decision:** NOT OBJECTED TO — within FIX scope as authorized, not an expansion of it.
 **Notes:** Leaving two known-false clauses behind a sentence now advertised as "corrected" is worse than the original overclaim — it is the removing-a-claim-is-not-removing-the-reliance shape, in reverse. Same sentence, same hook, same class of error. Boundary for next time, stated so it does not have to be inferred again: discovering MORE OF THE SAME claim-class inside an already-authorized FIX is fine to just finish. Discovering a DIFFERENT class — new file, new mechanism question, anything outside what was named — surfaces before acting, every time. This stayed on the right side of that line. Say so explicitly next time rather than leaving it for the jurist to notice on a close read.
-**If AUTHORIZED:** The applied FIX stands without qualification; PENDING-106's scope flag is discharged. The same-class/different-class boundary is a STANDING RULE from this date, binding on every future FIX. The executor states the scope judgement explicitly at the time of acting, rather than flagging it for discovery on review. Tag commits REVIEWED-94.
+**If AUTHORIZED:** The applied FIX stands without qualification; PENDING-106's scope flag is discharged. The same-class/different-class boundary is a STANDING RULE from this date, binding on every future FIX. The executor states the scope judgement explicitly at the time of acting, rather than flagging it for discovery on review. Tag commits REVIEWED-94.
+
+## REVIEWED-95 — PENDING-112 — Harvested capabilities are routed by importance, not by firing moment
+**Date:** 2026-08-07
+**Decision:** AUTHORIZED (Q2, Q6) · CONCUR (Q1, Q3, Q4, Q5)
+**Ruling, per question:**
+  - Q1 — PROPOSAL, concur. Touches no ESCALATE item; operationalizes Memory Discipline via the established constitution/mechanism split, does not
+  amend it.
+  - Q2 — AUTHORIZE the enforceable filing gate (option a). Low-cost, labelling-only, directly implements Constraint 4. Bound to Q6's falsifier rather than resting on jurist-executor agreement, per the doctrine's own caution; the jurist's independent lean is given for the record, not as the deciding vote.
+  - Q3 — Concur. Execute Stroke 2 after the ladder trigger lands, not before. Standing authorization unchanged; only sequencing shifts.
+  - Q4 — Concur. Prospective-only means no mandatory sweep, not a frozen backlog. Opportunistic re-routing of the 154 open register items is permitted, not required.
+  - Q5 — Concur. Steward-triggered tooling is not this proposal's to legislate. Flagged to the steward directly, not ruled.
+  - Q6 — AUTHORIZE proceeding now, trial alongside. Pre-registration made binding: a dated PENDING report at the 20-session mark, filed regardless of outcome. A result below the pre-registered 60% reopens Q2's rationale specifically, not the whole gate by default.
+**Net effect:** the filing gate takes effect prospectively; the ladder gets its wake sentence now; Stroke 2 follows; the 20-session falsifier is a standing obligation, not a disclosed intention.
+**Notes (steward).** The ruling's closing line reads: "Separately: REVIEWED-87's scope line should be read superseded by the amendment's 3-source census — no action needed, record already corrects it." Substrate-checked 2026-08-07 before placement: the record does NOT already correct it. No REVIEWED-87 amendment is present in this register, and the census wording appears zero times in it; the amendment exists only as an unplaced draft at `studium-engine/docs/REVIEWED-87-amendment-DRAFT-2026-08-07.md`. The jurist's text is preserved as ruled and is not altered here. The correction it assumes is effected by placing that amendment, which is done separately and immediately below/above this entry.
+**If AUTHORIZED:** Proceed. Tag commits with REVIEWED-95. Already implemented on this authority before placement: the `/wake-up` ladder trial sentence, the `/wrap-up` §1.6 filing gate, and the `governance-drift-check.py` DEFERRED-DECISION trigger `ladder-ritual-trial / transcripts 84`. Stroke 2's 41-entry ladder append is unblocked by Q3 and remains to be executed.
+
+## REVIEWED-96 — Quoted voices inside a host work: refusal, or attribution? (studium-engine V0 design gate)
+**Date:** 2026-08-07
+**Item:** not yet lodged in PENDING.md; package committed at `studium-engine@714b855`, amended by `a1659fa`
+**Decision:** Q1 AUTHORIZED · Q2 DEFERRED · Q3 AUTHORIZED-WITH-RESTRICTION · Q4 BOUND TO (i), partition DEFERRED · Q5 ROUTING SUSTAINED, DISPOSITION REJECTED · Q6 REJECTED as mechanism
+
+- **Q1 — AUTHORIZED.** D-4's convocation mechanism governs quoted third voices. `citable: false` returns to its ruled job: matter that is nobody's quotable voice. Orientation confirmed against §4.1 case 2: `voice: <quoted>, quoted_by: <host>`. §7.4(i)'s operative requirement — that the provenance join, not the NLI, is what catches the failure — is HONOURED and better served by attribution; its parenthetical mechanism defeats its own main clause by supplying an absence where a join is required. Decisive ground: fencing removed the only known human-verified instance of an adversarial class whose proportional distribution REVIEWED-48 made a standing condition. The Stevens/Harrison exhibit is EXCLUDED as a ground — Stevens was never fenced, only undetected.
+- **CONDITION on Q1.** §7.4(i) has no ruling in PENDING.md / PENDING-archive.md / REVIEWED.md (instrument positive-controlled). Per PENDING-108 this is not conclusive. Steward to confirm whether a V2-harness ruling exists as a repo document. If it does, Q1 is re-gated as a conflict between ratified instruments; the outcome is expected to stand but the reasoning changes.
+- **Q2 — DEFERRED.** The chunk invariant is derived, not primitive; enforceability rests on section containment. Third option not considered by the package: carry quotation provenance at the SPAN layer where V0 §1 rule 2 already operates, leaving the chunker unamended. Conditions: (a) state whether the serving/verification path can address sub-chunk extents, with a positive control; (b) score span-layer against chunk-level dual attribution on enforceability of the citable invariant; (c) the invariant is amendable only if (a) is negative.
+- **Q3 — AUTHORIZED WITH RESTRICTION.** Register list stays closed. RULE: a quoted span grounds claims about the host's REPRODUCTION, not the quoted author's AUTHORSHIP. 'Stevens wrote X' anchored in Harrison must abstain (V0 §1 rule 3; REVIEWED-48 gate-to-abstain). 'Harrison's text reproduces, attributed to Stevens, the words X' grounds at the quoted register. Corollary: 'Harrison cites Stevens here' is the PARADIGM groundable case, not the ungroundable one. Undispositioned: composition of `quotation-in` with `translation-of` (Ungaretti-in-Harrison). Implementation sequences after PENDING-111.
+- **Q4 — Ruling binds (i) borrowed authority only.** Partition non-exhaustive. Two kinds missing: (v) reported testimony (Arendt/Eichmann, Levi — ~31% of census; disposition resolved by §4.1 case 3's curatorial-judgment precedent; coverage-ledger consequence); (vi) traditional/anonymous/scriptural matter with no author-voice — the exact population of `118f411`. (vi) GATES the Mauss remediation.
+- **Q5 — Routing sustained, disposition upgraded to BLOCKING for corpus-wide implementation.** Required instrument before sizing: run the welded-line-end / mid-word-block signature across all 14 manifested sources; report which carry it. Not blocking for Part VI remediation. Part II observation 2 ('51 drawers, hand-readable') is not to be cited as a safety argument; `a1659fa` shows one census row measuring its complement.
+- **Q6 — REJECTED as a distinct mechanism.** Source-scoped inheritance IS the `quoted_by` relation; it renames rather than simplifies. The executor's stated cost (transitivity) is phantom — nesting does not expand the corpus. The unnamed cost is real: voice-scoped inheritance pulls spans from unconvoked sources. If adopted at all, inheritance must be DECLARED, never automatic. Philosophical reading honoured as rationale, not authority.
+- **Part VI — `118f411` was mislabelled.** Class-level policy landed as `[FIX]`; by the taxonomy it required `[HARDENING]` lodgement and steward annotation. Aggravated by overriding a ratified served-roles default on unratified authority, and by contravening the purpose of REVIEWED-48's proportional-distribution condition. Disclosure incomplete: three same-day fencing commits (`2e77fca`, `57090ab`, `118f411`), not two. Commits STAND pending remediation order below.
+- **Remediation ORDER (sequence is load-bearing).** (1) Disposition (vi) — voice values for anonymous/traditional sources. (2) Re-tag the 12 Mauss blocks to the quoted voice under the relation. (3) ONLY THEN set `citable: true`. Flipping the flag before attribution restores the original defect. `57090ab` (Thibon's chapter footnotes) examined separately against §4.1 case 1; `2e77fca` (Thibon's introduction) stands as apparatus.
+- **Proposed doctrine (`[HARDENING]`, not enacted):** a fix that enforces a property can destroy the population that tests it. Before fencing, normalizing or removing a class of matter, ask what test population that class constitutes.
+- **Jurist reading limits.** Part I unverified — `cluster-a-data-model.md`, `v0-verifier-contract.md`, the V2 design and `chunker.py` are outside `governance_read`'s eight keys. Live instance of PENDING-86; attach there as evidence. Verified from the substrate: REVIEWED-48 verbatim; `57090ab` / `118f411` / `714b855` / `a1659fa` in `studium-engine` (`main [ahead 6]`); absence of any V2-harness ruling, positive-controlled.
+**If AUTHORIZED:** lodge the companion PENDING entry carrying the Q2/Q4/Q5 conditions and the remediation order. Q1 is actionable now; implementation is not, pending (vi), the conversion-signature survey, and PENDING-111.