session 2026-09-11: harvest proposal H — the second dotfiles remote is a week behind and no wake saw it

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PJM5fwqp456LDGzqiZXsgu
This commit is contained in:
David F Glidden
2026-09-11 22:18:42 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent d79fe02ea5
commit 867fc4cb81
+2
View File
@@ -753,3 +753,5 @@ Each nearly read as a defect in the *quotation*. ⚠ **Bound:** correct extracti
**SECOND INSTANCE OF B, recorded rather than re-filed.** At the 2026-09-11 wake the daybook cue fired on a read-only command and said 'the write already succeeded'. No write had occurred. The cue now misdescribes its own trigger, as well as disagreeing with the skeleton. **SECOND INSTANCE OF B, recorded rather than re-filed.** At the 2026-09-11 wake the daybook cue fired on a read-only command and said 'the write already succeeded'. No write had occurred. The cue now misdescribes its own trigger, as well as disagreeing with the skeleton.
**NOT filed:** the vault-mirror binaries policy. It is a steward decision (the split, 2026-09-11), not a tool. It is recorded in the vault's `CLAUDE.md`. **NOT filed:** the vault-mirror binaries policy. It is a steward decision (the split, 2026-09-11), not a tool. It is recorded in the vault's `CLAUDE.md`.
| H | **The wake's dotfiles check compares against every remote, not only the upstream.** `/wake-up` §2.c reads `git status -sb`, which sees only the tracking remote (`github`). On 2026-09-11 the second remote `gitea` (`git.skemantix.com`) was found **54 commits behind, since 2026-09-04**, a week that no wake surfaced, while memory describes the files layer as 'dual-remote'. The wrap's §6.5 `git push` reaches only the upstream. Mechanical fix: the wake digest's REPOS line reports `rev-list --count <remote>/main..HEAD` for each remote. | patch (script) | **MECHANICAL** — every wake, via `wake-digest.py`. | PROPOSED — found at the 2026-09-11 wrap. ⚠ **gitea not pushed**: a second outward-facing target the wrap's instruction does not name, so it is left for the steward (dry-run: fast-forward, would succeed). |