diff --git a/claude/memory/MEMORY.md b/claude/memory/MEMORY.md
index 3b48149..319429e 100644
--- a/claude/memory/MEMORY.md
+++ b/claude/memory/MEMORY.md
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ permalink: claude-memory/memory
 - Chamber-typography — *tracker not yet established*; moves live in per-session memories (2026-05-11 →) + `project-chamber-cruft-restoration.md` + `project-chamber-typography-mining-plan-2026-05-15.md`.
 
 ## Active Session
-> 🔑 **PULLING THREAD — CLOSE THE FOOL.** Steward 2026-08-20: complete the Fool and the Obsidian work **before** the fence resumes. The Fool is now **one gate and two steward inputs** from runnable. ✅ **(1) REVIEWED-124 IS PLACED** (2026-08-20, `~/REVIEWED.md` L1929) — trial 09 void is in the register. ⚠ But its Q3 as placed carries the jurist's FL5 reading that OP-02 overturned the same evening; the correction is in PENDING.md and NOT in the register. **(2) Enter §5's testimony** in `input-dependence-01-PREREGISTRATION.md` — still reads `[ AWAITING ]`; the steward is the only party who has read all three outputs against the same documents, and recalled-after-a-result is not testimony. ⚠ **The §5 slot is phrased in ONE direction** (*"if your sense is that it landed somewhere the other two did not"*) — *nowhere* and *cannot tell* have no home in it; steward's to settle. ✅ **§2a added 2026-08-21** (steward-authorized, pre-gate): secondary observable — *does the Fool bound its own coverage?* — bare count, no threshold, no disposition. ✅ **§2b + §2c added 2026-08-22** (steward-authorized, pre-gate) — second matcher question (NEAR-IDENTICAL · DEFECT-BLIND · DEFECT-ANCHORED, asked only after all N primaries are locked) + the register observation. ⚠ **Drafting §2b surfaced that §4's harvest rested on an inference the measurement never makes** — chance-level matching does NOT establish sameness, so the declared deliverable could have been authorized on evidence that doesn't support it. ⚠ **§4 NOT amended — the artifact carries a visible §4/§2b tension, left for the gate deliberately.** ⚠ **The steward's cross-trial framing is HIS, not relayed** (zero hits across all 4 write-ups + log) — but his trial-04 reading and `fool-trial-04:39` are the same fact with opposite valence: *consistency is the finding-class AND the insensitivity* ⇒ H₀ reached independently by the party with least stake. **(3) The pre-registration goes to the jurist's gate** (sha256 **`7e1c146b…`**; 08-21 `769b057b…`; as-filed 08-20 `d41e1d57…`). ⚠ Residual coupling: the executor authored the instrument whose result bears on its own recommendation — the gate is the only check on that.
+> 🔑 **PULLING THREAD — THE FOOL IS SUPERSEDED, NOT ABANDONED, AND THE BUDDY PATTERN IS AUTHORIZED TO RUN.** ⚠ **NEXT ACT: the beacon, 2026-08-25T12:00:00Z** (epoch-ms `1787659200000`). §4 steps 1–4 are FILED AND PUSHED (`FOOL-SEED-RULE.md`); the §13.6 block is LIFTED (REVIEWED-125 AMENDMENT 1). **RUN ONCE. Stop and report on ANY failure — no reroll.** Pass `outputValue` EXACTLY AS SERVED (it is served UPPERCASE; the single normalization point is `derive_fool.py:79`). Fetch with **curl** — python urllib cannot reach the host. Record the value BEFORE running. ⚠ **The distinction that decides everything: the trial programme measured DETECTION for four trials because the fool's warrant was set to checkability on 2026-08-02. The buddy design REMOVES the warrant test rather than passing it — a position that makes no claims is not subject to one.** §6 of the trial design owns the word *abandonment*; no such verdict exists (trial 09 void ⇒ its criterion has no first input). ⚠ **`input-dependence-01` is HELD AT THE GATE, not parked — and if revived, RE-DERIVED not resumed.** ⚠ **PENDING-150 [ESCALATE] is unbundled: `~/CLAUDE.md` untouched; a fourth position is NOT ratified.**
 > ⚠ **CLASS E ARRIVING LIVE — placing REVIEWED-124 makes PENDING-148 read CLOSED while the OP-02 question is live.** One id, two asks; `governance_state()` reads headers, not Notes. This is PENDING-146's defect in real time, on today's own item.
 > ⚠ **THE SUBSTRATE OVERRULED BOTH AI PARTIES.** OP-02 was openable — the jurist called it *"the only document neither of us can open"*; it is on disk, hash-verified. **FL5 argues from Bourdieu's shared field and *illusio*, NOT formation.** Constraint 6 asserts difference of **formation** — an axis FL5 never uses. So C6 neither states FL5 "more sharply" (executor) nor negates its three-party half (jurist). Corpus check, 11 docs: `bourdieu`/`habitus`/`illusio` **0**, `peirce` **0**, FL4 substance **0**, FL3 **1** — against the pre-run census's 16/20/24. **The census counted topic-adjacency and over-reported the leak the executor's own recommendation rested on.**
 > ⚠ **THIRD check-before-claiming instance in three days, and it is INSIDE the document reporting the second.** Part IV.a propagated an inherited claim without opening a file whose hash the same package quotes three sections earlier. **Propagation is the more dangerous form — an inherited claim arrives already looking checked.** The jurist said "two is worth watching" before this one was found.
diff --git a/claude/memory/session-ledger-2026-08-21.md b/claude/memory/session-ledger-2026-08-21.md
index 679b1ac..b8c816a 100644
--- a/claude/memory/session-ledger-2026-08-21.md
+++ b/claude/memory/session-ledger-2026-08-21.md
@@ -164,3 +164,33 @@ type: feedback
 - **No beacon pulse fetched**, target or near-future. No dry run attempted.
 - Owed under §15b: state the zero-contribution in PENDING-89; open the v1 Chamber archive read as
   its own [PROPOSAL].
+
+### Authorization moves — 2026-08-22, fourth batch
+
+- **REVIEWED-125 + AMENDMENT 1 placed** (`38c4866f`), each committed on its own. Verified the
+  amendment JOINS rather than replaces — original intact at L1968, placed text byte-identical to
+  the draft, and the lone git "deletion" was only the `\ No newline at end of file` marker.
+- **⚠ THE BEACON RUN IS AUTHORIZED — once, 2026-08-25T12:00:00Z.** §13.6's block lifted; its
+  stated condition (§5 ratification) was met.
+- PENDING-149 AMENDMENT 3 records nine dispositions + the binding execution constraints in one
+  place, so the 25th does not depend on reconstructing them from three documents.
+
+### Returns — 2026-08-22, fourth batch
+
+- ⚠ **`git add -A` swept the steward's REVIEWED-124 placement (39 lines) into `acfbb9f`, a commit
+  titled entirely about the fool seed rule.** Constitutional placement filed under the wrong
+  heading in the log. NOT rewritten — pushed to two remotes, and rewriting pushed history is worse.
+  Corrected by recording it, and by committing every subsequent placement alone.
+- **Did not assume the steward placed the draft verbatim** — diffed it. It matched. The habit is
+  worth more than this instance: had they edited the beacon-block section (the one I flagged as
+  theirs to decide), acting on my draft would have authorized a run they had not authorized.
+
+### Open horizons — after the beacon
+
+- §8 proportions (mumble rate — v2 says "low, fixed", **no number**) + the mumble-hook answer,
+  daemon costed not dismissed.
+- `[FIX]` abandonment → retirement, deliberately after the beacon.
+- §8a body satisfying cond. 2 — variation from time or nothing, never content.
+- PENDING-89: write the zero-contribution in explicitly; open the v1 Chamber archive read.
+- ⚠ **The jurist ruled on pasted text, not the filed artifact** (`9aceed7f…` unverified from its
+  side). PENDING-82/86 recurring, now inside a ruling.