David/dotfiles
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

skill(jurist-package): patch — trace a ruled finding's inference, not just its words (steward-authorized 2026-07-20)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
David F Glidden
2026-07-20 21:20:06 +02:00
parent f67bf6e582
commit b9e0137bcc
3 changed files with 6 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
claude/memory/skill-harvest-register.md
+3 -3
View File
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ metadata:
node_type: memory
type: reference
originSessionId: a8eb1d46-314e-4545-a133-f747c69ad5b4
modified: 2026-07-20T19:11:51.018Z
modified: 2026-07-20T19:19:43.374Z
permalink: claude-memory/skill-harvest-register
---
@@ -36,11 +36,11 @@ The single place proposed skills live so they don't evaporate between sessions.
**BUILT this session (was authorized "build next" at the 07-19 harvest review):** **`/jurist-package`** — `~/dotfiles/claude/skills/jurist-package/SKILL.md` (symlinked into `~/.claude/skills/`; the authored-skill convention). Grounded in the 2 proven exemplars, not recall. **Proven 2× same session** (the PENDING-67 package + the F2 correction relay, both hook-passed on first write, both ruled). Absorbs `/spec-amendment` (supersession → the ladder, as ruled). `/model-handoff` remains the next authorized build.
**New PATCH proposal (awaiting steward):**
**PATCH — BUILT 2026-07-20 (steward-authorized):**
| Skill | Kind | One-line | Origin | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| `/jurist-package` | patch | Add to the **after-ruling / Part-A drafting** guidance: *when transcribing a RULED finding into constitutional/amendment prose, trace the finding's own **inference direction**, not just quote its words — a faithful transcription of the WORDS can invert the INFERENCE.* Earned HARD this session, **twice**, both jurist-caught: (a) the PENDING-67 Q1 lean ("no new constitutional text") faithfully read §V's prohibitions but missed §V's *silence* on the enforcement locus — the gap itself; (b) the v2.3.0 Part-A draft wrote "re-conversion is *not* vacuous," a different sentence producing the *identical* misreading the Q2 ruling was written to prevent, inside that very subsection. The skill already names consequence-trace-one-level-deeper for the PACKAGE's own claims; this extends it to the act of **transcribing someone else's ruled finding** — a distinct, recurring failure surface. Kin to Symmetria §3 `the-say-do-seam` / `consequence-trace-one-level-shallow`, at the constitution-drafting layer. | 2026-07-20 (2× jurist-caught) | **PROPOSED** |
| `/jurist-package` | patch | Added to the **Load-bearing disciplines**: *"Trace a ruled finding's inference, not just its words"* — when transcribing a RULED finding into a package claim / Addendum correction / constitutional prose, a faithful transcription of the WORDS can invert the INFERENCE; ask which way the inference runs and whether the sentence produces the reading the ruling was written to *prevent*. Earned HARD **twice**, both jurist-caught: (a) the PENDING-67 Q1 lean read §V's prohibitions but missed §V's *silence* on the enforcement locus — the gap itself; (b) the v2.3.0 Part-A draft wrote "re-conversion is *not* vacuous," the identical misreading the Q2 ruling was written to prevent, inside that very subsection. Extends the existing consequence-trace (which covers the PACKAGE's own claims) to the act of transcribing someone else's ruled finding. | 2026-07-20 (2× jurist-caught) | **BUILT 2026-07-20** (provenance comment in SKILL.md; steward-authorized) |
*(One candidate, load-bearing: it recurred twice in one session and the jurist caught both. The skill carries the right discipline for its own claims but not for the transcription act; the patch closes exactly the gap I fell through — the yardstick met, the jurist had to correct the same shape twice.)*