From c08bd10c441f12016a2e7939c849be50da851b0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David F Glidden Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2026 11:27:28 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] REVIEWED-135 condition 6: three stale records corrected as one dated act MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The dated steward act REVIEWED-132 §6 reserves for normalising a placed record. All three Awaiting lines were false and had been for weeks; nothing in them turned on when the dispositioning pass ran. PENDING-133 (parent) — read "Steward authorization" for four weeks while its own Status line, FOUR LINES BELOW ITS HEADER, recorded withdrawal by the proposer on 2026-08-10. Every reader showed a withdrawn proposal as awaiting the steward, and on 2026-09-05 it came within one act of being authorized as such. PENDING-133 AMENDMENT 1 — discharged by REVIEWED-135 and its AMENDMENT 1. PENDING-134 — ruled by REVIEWED-121, H3 disclosure placed at studium-engine 9221dd8. H1's condition was satisfied by REVIEWED-117 and the record never said so. ⚠ A CONFLICT IN THE AUTHORIZING TEXT, RECORDED IN THE RECORD RATHER THAN RESOLVED SILENTLY. Condition 6 directs PENDING-134's line to name "the ruling that disposes of it" and defers the id to condition 7; condition 7 was discharged as REVIEWED-121, verified twice. AMENDMENT 1 point 6 instead restates it as `REVIEWED-116 point 5` — the authorization for the identification pass, quoted verbatim 44 lines above it in the same document, and not a disposition of PENDING-134. Written as REVIEWED-121 on condition 6's operative words and condition 7's verified discharge; the discrepancy is annotated at the line and reported to steward and jurist. PENDING-134's entry sits in an append-only archive whose header says "do not edit entries". This edit is made under a dated steward act, the stated exception, and says so at the line. Effect: the visible queue falls 56 -> 54, both PENDING-133 blocks detected by the Awaiting-line closure anchor added yesterday. Instruments green: wake-digest 99 controls, drift-check 59/59, no new register-integrity finding from the placement. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X3L79vgAnt1x2kxvf23Qt7 --- PENDING-archive.md | 14 +++++++++++++- PENDING.md | 10 ++++++++-- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/PENDING-archive.md b/PENDING-archive.md index 39fbb49..2b90692 100644 --- a/PENDING-archive.md +++ b/PENDING-archive.md @@ -3270,7 +3270,19 @@ Then §6.2's resulting state must be named, and there are two options: **(i) a p **Files affected:** `~/REVIEWED.md` (the doctrine entry, carrying H3's disclosure and (b)'s defeater) · `corpus/v2-stratum-tags.yaml` (re-tagging under whichever rule lands) · PENDING-131/132/133. -**Awaiting:** Steward authorization, **after** the MCP restart makes §5/§6.2 independently readable (H1). +**Awaiting:** nothing — **RULED by REVIEWED-121** (`## REVIEWED-121 — PENDING-134 — The whose-proposition +test…`), and the H3 **disclosure placed 2026-09-05** at studium-engine `9221dd8`. H1's condition was +satisfied by REVIEWED-117 and the record never said so. +⚠ **A CONFLICT IN THE AUTHORIZING TEXT, RECORDED RATHER THAN RESOLVED SILENTLY.** REVIEWED-135 +condition 6 directs this line to name *"the ruling that disposes of it"* and defers the id to condition +7; condition 7 was discharged as **REVIEWED-121**, verified twice (header read directly, and `'134' ∈ +ruled_pendings()`). REVIEWED-135 AMENDMENT 1 point 6 instead restates it as `REVIEWED-116 point 5` — +which is the authorization for the **identification pass**, quoted verbatim 44 lines above it in the same +document, and is not a disposition of PENDING-134. Written here as REVIEWED-121, on condition 6's own +operative words and condition 7's verified discharge. The executor did not silently choose: the +discrepancy is reported to the steward and jurist and is correctable from this line. +⚠ This entry sits in an append-only archive whose header says *do not edit entries*. This edit is made +under a dated steward act, which is the stated exception (REVIEWED-132 §6). --- diff --git a/PENDING.md b/PENDING.md index 46220bf..a447425 100644 --- a/PENDING.md +++ b/PENDING.md @@ -1435,7 +1435,10 @@ Measured against the three contested cases, from `corpus/mauss-phase2-reanchored **Scope:** re-tagging is a reading pass over the fr cell's F4 instances and the en set's B4 — small, bounded, and it lets the fr cell be **re-tagged correctly rather than merely shortened**. Naming is the steward's; the split is what is proposed. -**Awaiting:** Steward authorization. +**Awaiting:** nothing — **WITHDRAWN by the proposer 2026-08-10; no ask outstanding. See PENDING-134.** +⚠ This line read `Steward authorization` for four weeks while the block's own **Status** line, four +lines below its header, recorded the withdrawal. Every reader therefore showed a withdrawn proposal as +awaiting the steward, and on 2026-09-05 it was within one act of being authorized as such. --- @@ -1624,7 +1627,10 @@ other side that the addressable spans were never where the exposure lived. **No **Corrected scope: every fr grounded span — nine or ten — read for reported speech, then dispositioned where present.** Still cheap; arrived at by reading rather than by inheriting P7's marker set. -**Awaiting:** Steward authorization (with PENDING-134, which supplies the rule this pass applies). +**Awaiting:** nothing — **DISCHARGED 2026-09-05 by REVIEWED-135**, which authorized this pass, and by +REVIEWED-135 AMENDMENT 1, which records that it had already been run on 2026-08-13 under REVIEWED-116 +point 5 and was replicated blind on 2026-09-05 at n=8. The parenthetical condition — *with PENDING-134, +which supplies the rule* — was satisfied at REVIEWED-121. ---