session 2026-06-07: REVIEWED-32..35 (steward-filed) + PENDING-30..33 status updates + Waves-2/3 session memory, ledger, tracker + verification-ladder instruments

PENDING.md

@@ -833,6 +833,8 @@ The Jurist's six-phase authorization map governs sequencing. Cross-cutting succe
 **Files affected:** `AldineXXI-specification.md` Prologue *Postures*; consequential: vignette spec Part II (PENDING-31), §VII.f implementation note (CSS scroll-driven), removal of the residual script (roadmap W3.4).
 **Awaiting:** Jurist review (framework extension per §XIV category 2; steward direction already given).
 
+**Status (2026-06-07):** JURIST CONCURRED (Option 1) with one required amendment + one specification, both folded into the spec text as landed: condition 1 gains the demonstration requirement (*"demonstrated in the implementation record that the specific behavior cannot be achieved by HTML, CSS, or build-time generation"* — auditable artifact, not internal judgment); "observes nothing" specified (no reader behavior observed, no data collected, no side-effects beyond the reader's own initiated choice — localStorage-of-reader-preference passes, beacons do not). §III.b font-size control recorded as the held exception that keeps the gate honest. Spec text landed in W2.4 (ARC `7d9bad3`). W3.4 residual-script removal proceeds independently. Awaiting steward REVIEWED entry.
+
 ## PENDING-31 — Vignette Part II: build-time SVG+CSS renderer
 **Date:** 2026-06-07
 **Tag:** PROPOSAL
@@ -843,6 +845,8 @@ The Jurist's six-phase authorization map governs sequencing. Cross-cutting succe
 **Files affected:** `vignette-specification.md` Part II (Component 3 + build-sequence wording); Part I untouched.
 **Awaiting:** Jurist review (Part II was jurist-passed 2026-05-29; this revises that pass).
 
+**Status (2026-06-07):** JURIST CONCURRED (Option 1). Fidelity analysis assessed sound; build-computed `light-dark()` pairs assessed an *improvement* over the runtime mapping (orientation-preserving by construction). One flag discharged before any executor instruction: the **Component-2 scoping note** is in the spec (the ~30-line estimate superseded; the ~300–400 lines of rendering computation migrate as a Haskell function — complexity migrated into the typed build step, not reduced). Architecture diagram drops "browser, runtime" from Component 3. Dwell-test gate unchanged (first prototype to the jurist). Spec revision landed ARC `4b0970b`. Awaiting steward REVIEWED entry.
+
 ## PENDING-32 — Frontmatter §2.8: a rendering inherits its work's class
 **Date:** 2026-06-07
 **Tag:** HARDENING
@@ -853,6 +857,8 @@ The Jurist's six-phase authorization map governs sequencing. Cross-cutting succe
 **Files affected:** `frontmatter-specification.md` §2.8; `site.hs` (validation); content-typology cross-reference.
 **Awaiting:** Jurist concurrence (amends the PENDING-25/REVIEWED-28 doctrine by extension).
 
+**Status (2026-06-07):** JURIST CONCURRED (Option 1), conditional on §2.8 being self-standing (`work:`/`translator:` defined). **Condition found pre-discharged on verification:** the jurist read a stale copy of the frontmatter spec — the live §2.8 (ARC `e2866da`, 2026-06-05, per PENDING-25/REVIEWED-28) already defines both fields, with the jurist's own scope-boundary language verbatim. No live-state/spec-state gap exists. **To relay to the jurist at next exchange** so the record sheds the stale premise. The inheritance clause landed as a subsidiary convention of the existing §2.8 (ARC `4e89337`); the build check ships with Stage-G enforcement (roadmap W5). Awaiting steward REVIEWED entry.
+
 ## PENDING-33 — Essay-versioning: truth-up and promotion from DRAFT
 **Date:** 2026-06-07
 **Tag:** PROPOSAL
@@ -862,3 +868,5 @@ The Jurist's six-phase authorization map governs sequencing. Cross-cutting succe
 **Recommendation:** Option 1; (b)'s exemplar choice is a steward call inside the jurist pass.
 **Files affected:** `essay-versioning-specification.md`; possibly `site.hs`/`about-page.html` if (b) wires the stamp.
 **Awaiting:** Steward authorization + jurist review.
+
+**Status (2026-06-07):** JURIST APPROVED the truth-up (a/c/d concur; on (b) the jurist offered a disposition: re-designate the exemplar to an *After the Reply* essay with live revisions; the `edition_label` orphan must not survive the pass unresolved). **STEWARD AUTHORIZED + ruled (b) same day:** exemplar → *The Ethics of the Reply* (jurist's disposition accepted); `edition_label` **dropped from the §6 example** (field stays available; the colophon's inert carrier recorded honestly). Executed ARC `392d8c8`: spec promoted **OPERATIVE (built scope: §§1–5, §7 items 1–5; deferred: §7 items 6–8, retractation UI, version-index page)**; §4 = shipped stamp shape (verified verbatim in compiled output); `sequence_position` aligned to `sequence_order`. Closes the corpus's one materially dishonest status line. Awaiting steward REVIEWED entry.