session 2026-07-18 S2: 2b wiring built test-first (7f98488/c9b09f8) — S2 session file + ledger + KG + register; S1 demoted to reference

2026-07-18 17:27:09 +02:00
parent 478c5df10f
commit cccc2e2776
6 changed files with 71 additions and 4 deletions
@@ -385,3 +385,5 @@
 {"subject":"claude-code","predicate":"drift-pattern","object":"trusted-a-tool-docstring-a-derived-self-assessment-for-a-fact-that-lives-in-another-file — wrote 'build_loeb_sidecar is NOT in test_tools' into a jurist brief from the tool's own docstring, without grepping test_tools.py (which held the fact; 16 refs — it IS in the fleet). The claim OUTRAN the reading: I read the producer + gate + operative text and called that 'reading the substrate', but a claim ABOUT the tool's test-coverage is grounded in the TEST FILE, not the tool's self-description. This is (a) the chamber verify-against-substrate-not-the-derived-artifact discipline — which I QUOTED this same session — and (b) the CLAUDE.md contamination directive 'accept a component's self-assessment... and not ask whether it is honest', both violated. Caught by me at wrap (doc-currency), but AFTER the brief reached the jurist (immaterial to the ruling — luck, not diligence). Antidote: a factual claim's grounding must reach the file that HOLDS the fact, not one that merely describes it; when asserting X-is-in-Y, read Y. Steward-caught the say/do gap (I made a show of substrate-reading, then trusted a docstring).","valid_from":"2026-07-17","valid_to":null,"confidence":1.0,"source_file":"session-2026-07-17-v2.1.0-landed-operative-2b-forks-to-jurist.md","extracted_at":"2026-07-17"}
 {"subject":"chamber-library","predicate":"governance-state","object":"REVIEWED-62 APPLIED 2026-07-18 (commit 6d6268a): item-(f) amended on all 3 carriers byte-identical (no citation-credited anchors[]; raw loeb-line retained uncredited as #2's re-stamp input); critical-apparatus channel named distinct from the app[] array (sidecar-schema Naming note; 3rd shared-name collision); 3 fleet-v1 kinds (list/unrecognized/editorial-insertion) landed in doctrine via §4 FIX lane, list = produced-with-a-content-edge; sections explicitly produced-without-proof. The 2b wiring build (sidecar_gate steps 2-4) is CLEARED; residual-(b) gates REVIEWED-58.","valid_from":"2026-07-18","valid_to":null,"confidence":1.0,"source_file":"session-2026-07-18-s1-reviewed-62-applied-wiring-gate-cleared.md","extracted_at":"2026-07-18"}
 {"subject":"claude-code","predicate":"drift-pattern","object":"assert-X-in-Y-read-Y antidote HELD on first post-lesson use (calibration, not a new drift): the five-app[]-kinds claim was grounded in build_loeb_sidecar's CODE BODY (lines 148-231) while its docstring cue-map still showed two. Jurist-side counterpart same day: the 07-16 sections tension sat through a reading-gate and surfaced only when the text had to be ACTED on — 'a gate that passes a document and a build that has to implement it are different tests' (implementation-is-a-second-gate; harvest candidate).","valid_from":"2026-07-18","valid_to":null,"confidence":1.0,"source_file":"session-2026-07-18-s1-reviewed-62-applied-wiring-gate-cleared.md","extracted_at":"2026-07-18"}
+{"subject":"claude-code","predicate":"drift-pattern","object":"test-first-without-a-witnessed-red — composed fixtures before the implementation but ran both green together; the red state was never observed, so 'test-first' was actually fixtures-first. The teeth evidence must then come from KNOWN-BAD fixtures (they held: novel kind / foreign scheme / citation_coverage / pairing-dishonesty / missing-declaration all HELD). Antidote: run the fixtures once against the unbuilt seam to witness the red, OR name the evidence honestly as fixture-teeth. Self-caught at S2 wrap (a calibration, not a steward catch).","valid_from":"2026-07-18","valid_to":null,"confidence":1.0,"source_file":"session-2026-07-18-s2-2b-wiring-built-fleet-proven.md","extracted_at":"2026-07-18"}
+{"subject":"chamber-library-2b-wiring","predicate":"status","object":"BUILT test-first S2 2026-07-18 (7f98488+c9b09f8, both remotes): sidecar_gate + V-DSL body branch as thin consumers of the declared boundary (graduation-spec.yaml sidecar:); fleet 141/141; dry-run inert; false-ABSTAIN closed. HELD OPEN: line-ref coordinate contract (producer body-array indices vs schema file coordinates + frontmatter offset) → rides residual-(b) → REVIEWED-58. implementation-is-a-second-gate earned its first code-level instance here.","valid_from":"2026-07-18","valid_to":null,"confidence":1.0,"source_file":"session-2026-07-18-s2-2b-wiring-built-fleet-proven.md","extracted_at":"2026-07-18"}