diff --git a/REVIEWED.md b/REVIEWED.md index 7512cfa..22a8c61 100644 --- a/REVIEWED.md +++ b/REVIEWED.md @@ -1808,4 +1808,24 @@ fixture named as such. > **The whose-proposition test.** A claim grounded in a span containing reported speech is **admissible** when it asserts the **host author's** proposition — the reported words serving as evidence inside the host's own argument — and **refusable** when it asserts the **nested voice's** proposition as the host's own. Reported speech is therefore a stratum-B span property for the fr/en Tier-2 gold, not a disqualifying structural mark; the disposition is fixed by the claim, not by the span. The refusable half does not satisfy §7.4(i), whose provenance join remains owed. -**If AUTHORIZED:** the doctrine paragraph, point 7's defeater and point 9's disclosure are placed. `corpus/v2-stratum-tags.yaml` gains the two declared fields; no span is re-dispositioned by this entry — L926 (retracted, REVIEWED-118) and L1551 (reclassified, REVIEWED-119) are unchanged, and the immediate corpus effect is nil. The §5 F4 row is NOT amended, and point 3's cheap structural check is thereby lost: an F4 mark becomes compatible with both gold and negative, and a reader must consult the claim to know which. That is the price, stated here rather than left to be discovered. `ratio_A_to_B` stays **VOID** and is re-derived ONCE after **both** this entry and PENDING-137 land and all dispositions are recorded (REVIEWED-116 point 5). The fused-voice sub-type name (`negative_sub_type_OPEN`, REVIEWED-119 point 3) and the gold-schema question (REVIEWED-119 point 4) remain open and are decided by neither entry. `voice_stamp` remains unwired. No live instance exercises this doctrine at ratification; it is untested-in-force, and its first genuine exercise is the first newly-authored fr/en pair with reported speech. Tag follow-on commits REVIEWED-121. \ No newline at end of file +**If AUTHORIZED:** the doctrine paragraph, point 7's defeater and point 9's disclosure are placed. `corpus/v2-stratum-tags.yaml` gains the two declared fields; no span is re-dispositioned by this entry — L926 (retracted, REVIEWED-118) and L1551 (reclassified, REVIEWED-119) are unchanged, and the immediate corpus effect is nil. The §5 F4 row is NOT amended, and point 3's cheap structural check is thereby lost: an F4 mark becomes compatible with both gold and negative, and a reader must consult the claim to know which. That is the price, stated here rather than left to be discovered. `ratio_A_to_B` stays **VOID** and is re-derived ONCE after **both** this entry and PENDING-137 land and all dispositions are recorded (REVIEWED-116 point 5). The fused-voice sub-type name (`negative_sub_type_OPEN`, REVIEWED-119 point 3) and the gold-schema question (REVIEWED-119 point 4) remain open and are decided by neither entry. `voice_stamp` remains unwired. No live instance exercises this doctrine at ratification; it is untested-in-force, and its first genuine exercise is the first newly-authored fr/en pair with reported speech. Tag follow-on commits REVIEWED-121. + +## REVIEWED-121 — AMENDMENT 1 (2026-08-14): the defeater is declared and permanently empty on the inherited set +**Date:** 2026-08-14 +**Amends:** REVIEWED-121 (PENDING-134), points 7 and 8 and the closing paragraph. Recorded as an amendment sitting alongside the original, not an edit to it: REVIEWED-121 is placed and executed, and no silent revision. +**Raised by:** the executor, during execution, unprompted by any ruling. The finding was not anticipated by PENDING-134, by the jurist package, or by this seat. +**Decision:** The executor's disposition is UPHELD. `defeater_has_ever_been_exercisable: false` stands as written and is the correct shape. One further field is required (A3). The ratified doctrine is unchanged; no span is re-dispositioned; PENDING-134 is not re-opened. + +**What was found.** Point 7 replaced reader-independence with order-independence: a disposition recorded *before* the doctrine is consulted. For all eleven inherited spans that moment is past and unrecoverable. Back-filling the field from a reading taken now would place a post-doctrine judgment in a field whose entire evidential value is that it precedes one — self-confirming, and the doctrine would have been ratified holding a defeater built from itself. The executor declined to populate and recorded the absence instead. That refusal is upheld: recording an honest empty is the discipline, and the distinction it preserves — *never exercisable* is not *not yet defeated* — is the substance of the finding. + +**A1 — THE DEFECT IS IN POINT 7 AND IT IS THIS SEAT'S.** Point 7 asserts that order-independence is 'the stronger instrument in any case'. That claim was unpriced in one respect. Personnel-independence is **retroactively** applicable: a second reader, had one existed, could have read spans already dispositioned. Order-independence is **prospective only**. The substitution was therefore not a strict gain — it traded an unavailable instrument for one that is unexercisable on everything that currently exists. Point 7's parenthetical stands as to contamination (two readers who both know the doctrine can both be led by it); it does not stand as an unqualified comparison, and is corrected here. + +**A2 — 'UNTESTED-IN-FORCE' IS RESTATED AS UNTESTABLE, AND H1(b) IS SATISFIED PROSPECTIVELY ONLY.** REVIEWED-121's closing paragraph records the doctrine as 'untested-in-force'. *Untested* implies testable-and-untested. On the inherited set the doctrine has **no defeater at all** — not a weak one, none — and cannot acquire one. The accurate statement: **the whose-proposition test is untestable on the entire inherited fr/en set, permanently, and its defeater is exercisable only by newly-authored pairs.** H1(b)'s requirement that an AUTHORIZED doctrine state what would falsify it is met prospectively and not otherwise. This sharpens point 8 rather than replacing it: the single-reader condition is standing, and this is its first priced consequence. + +**A3 — ⚠ REQUIRED: THE LATCH WILL OTHERWISE DISCHARGE A DISCLOSURE IT DOES NOT COVER.** `defeater_has_ever_been_exercisable` is a monotone latch, which is right as far as it goes. But when the first newly-authored pair records a pre-doctrine disposition, the latch flips to `true` — and thereafter any recall figure pooled over the fr cell carries `true` while the inherited spans still carry no pre-doctrine disposition and never can. One pair from outside the inherited set would silently discharge a disclosure covering eleven spans it has nothing to do with. That is the PENDING-136 denominator class — a fact true of one population read as true of another — and this instance would be **built into the mechanism** rather than committed in prose. Fourth occurrence in this arc; the first that would be structural. Required alongside the latch, in `corpus/v2-stratum-tags.yaml`: + +```yaml +defeater_has_ever_been_exercisable: false +defeater_dispositions_recorded: 0 +defeater_population: +``` \ No newline at end of file