session 2026-07-04 night: Fable stage-1 rebuild plan ruled 5/5 (studium d968241) + session memory + ledger + register
This commit is contained in:
@@ -316,3 +316,12 @@ The single place proposed skills live so they don't evaporate between sessions.
|
||||
| **`/model-handoff`** (premium-model scope-charter) | REINFORCED (existing proposal, 2026-06-12) | Used tonight end-to-end: produced `studium-engine/docs/stage-1-replan-scope-charter-2026-07-05.md` on Opus (§0 discipline / §1 settled / §2 already-read / §3 bounded-reading / §4 deliverable / §5 report-and-stop) as the Fable-5 handoff; clear+wake not switch-in-place; artifacts-are-the-handoff. Second clean use → strengthens the standing proposal. | PROPOSED (reinforced) |
|
||||
|
||||
*(Both genuine, both recurring-shaped. The CI-for-ESCALATE is a jurist-ruled standing practice worth a ladder entry; the model-handoff is its second proven use. No NEW skill emerged — the chamber-specific instruments (exclusion-path, archive-audit, Instrument-B hardening) are corpus work, not skills.)*
|
||||
|
||||
### Harvest 2026-07-04 (night — the Fable replan session)
|
||||
|
||||
| Element | Kind | One-line | Status |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **`/model-handoff`** (proposed 2026-06-12; reinforced 07-04 eve) | **REINFORCED — 3rd use, FIRST full receiving-end run** | Tonight was the first time the pattern ran END-TO-END as designed: fresh Fable-5 session woke into the scope-charter, read only the bounded list, produced the deliverable (`stage-1-rebuild-plan-2026-07-05.md`), took inline steward rulings, recorded them INTO the artifact, committed, stopped — chat disposable, artifact carries everything. Also surfaced its one authoring hazard: the charter contained a wrong path (`chamber-library/PENDING.md` — doesn't exist) → the skill should mandate **verify every path in §3's reading list before writing the charter**. Pattern proven; proposal now has 3 uses + 1 authoring rule. | PROPOSED (reinforced; +path-verification rule) |
|
||||
| **MEMORY.md deeper-reduction** (proposed 2026-06-08, condition-gated) | **CONDITION NOW MET — authorize the focused pass** | The 06-08 proposal deferred the risky deeper reduction "only if 157KB still trips 'only part loaded'." Tonight the index is **204.5KB vs a 24.4KB load limit** and a PostToolUse hook actively demanded compaction to ~17KB mid-wrap. NOT executed (the proposal explicitly names it "its own focused pass, not a tail-of-session move" — steward-unauthorized). Evidence is now decisive: ~88% of the index doesn't load at wake. Recommend authorizing the focused pass (compress archived one-liners further + move stable reference sections to a consult-on-demand `MEMORY-reference.md`; backup first, as 06-08). | PROPOSED (trigger met; awaiting steward authorization for a dedicated pass) |
|
||||
|
||||
*(Two, neither manufactured: the first is the strongest evidence yet for an already-standing proposal plus one earned authoring rule; the second converts tonight's hook pressure into the governed channel rather than a tail-of-session mutation of real memory.)*
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user