session 2026-08-08: REVIEWED-98 placed (PENDING-114 census authorized)

REVIEWED.md

@@ -1076,3 +1076,25 @@ nested inside a genuine delimiter pair separates correctly
 **Scope.** Disposes (vi) only. REVIEWED-96 Q1–Q6 and PENDING-113's Q2/Q4/Q5 conditions are untouched. The Harrison/Mark finding raised alongside this is filed separately as **PENDING-114**, not as evidence for this entry.
 
 **Numbering note (PENDING-110).** This is `REVIEWED-97`, the next in its own sequence — not `REVIEWED-113`. The registers are independent; PENDING-110 REJECTED renumbering-to-align, and numbering this 113 would skip 97–112 and entrench the false expectation that the sequences match. The heading names its PENDING per that item's convention (b).
+
+## REVIEWED-98 — PENDING-114 — Scripture quoted inside a host text, unmarked: authorize the validated census
+
+**Date:** 2026-08-08
+**Decision:** **(b) AUTHORIZED**, with **(c) attached exactly as proposed** for whatever (b)'s validated recall cannot reach. (a) — fix the Harrison span and stop — REJECTED.
+**Provenance:** steward, 2026-08-08, on the executor's PENDING-114. Reasoning recorded here rather than compressed, per PENDING-108/113: a ruling that exists only in conversation evaporates.
+
+**Ground 1 — (a) would repeat, in miniature, the error already named in this same thread.** Fixing Harrison alone treats a class-shaped problem with a span-shaped fix. That is not an analogy to `118f411`; it is the same taxonomy error, identified hours earlier the same day and now written into the register against it.
+
+**Ground 2 — the scale context, which PENDING-114 understates.** Harrison's quotation is invisible to any sidecar-based detector because it belongs to the intra-line class measured 2026-08-07 at **~6,455 marked quotation runs across 8 sources, ~94% of them intra-line** and therefore not expressible at the current section granularity. Harrison is **not an isolated miss — it is the first confirmed hit in a population that is this corpus's blind spot for precisely the property the corpus exists to guarantee.** First-order gap, not a curiosity.
+
+**Ground 3 — why (b) rather than merely thorough.** (b) is built so as not to repeat the marker census's own failure. It does not propose trusting a signal; it proposes **demonstrating recall against a hand-scored known-positive / known-negative pair** — Harrison's actual quotation against Weil's mentions — before any corpus-wide claim is made. That is the discriminating-instance discipline (REVIEWED-83 A1) applied to the instrument *before* it is applied to the corpus.
+
+**Ground 4 — the payoff, and the proposed doctrine earning its keep forward.** Whatever (b) finds is **marked, not fenced.** That is a materially different act from `118f411`: attribution removes nothing from the test population, it improves it. A correctly-marked Harrison/Mark instance becomes a **better** positive control than an unmarked one, not a destroyed one. REVIEWED-96's proposed doctrine — *a fix that enforces a property can destroy the population that tests it* — is here running **forward in time**, as a design constraint on remediation rather than as a post-hoc finding. This is the first occasion on which it has done real work.
+
+**On (c) as the attached fallback.** If the validated detector's recall does not reach some part of the class, **disclosing that limit is a legitimate stopping point, not a failure to execute (b) properly** — the same standing (c) has in REVIEWED-48's gate-to-abstain, which was ruled doctrine-consistent rather than merely tolerated. (c) is not a consolation branch; it is the honest-degradation route (Constraint #4) and is authorized on its own terms.
+
+**Binding on execution.** No corpus-wide claim — finding *or* all-clear — may be reported from the detector until its recall is demonstrated on the hand-scored pair. The marker census already run is a **failed instrument**, not a count, and is not to be cited as either evidence or reassurance.
+
+**Scope.** Disposes PENDING-114 only. REVIEWED-96, REVIEWED-97 and PENDING-115 are untouched; PENDING-115 remains a separate blocker on remediation step 3.
+
+**Pacing.** Execution timing left to the executor as a proportionate-to-energy call, explicitly not decided by the substantive case above.

claude/memory/MEMORY.md

@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ permalink: claude-memory/memory
 > 🔑 **The error to not repeat:** a field that is a KEY cannot also be a CATEGORY. `voice: traditional` would have made the Havámál and the Mahābhārata **one convocable speaker**. Invisible from the taxonomy side; obvious from `retrieve.py`.
 > ⚠ **Surah LXIV (at-Taghābun), NOT CXIV.** The sidecar title was wrong and it reached **REVIEWED-96, PENDING-113 and memory**. The *"Say"* (قُل) formula opens an-Nās and is **absent** from the passage Mauss quotes — do not reuse the old worked note.
 > 🔴 **`test_navigate.py` is RED and has been for a day** — `118f411` split Mauss `body` → `body-01..13`, so the hardcoded node id is stale (invariant itself verified intact). **Fourth defect in a commit already corrected twice.** Re-run the fleet after any sidecar/corpus change.
-> ⏳ **Steward-authorized, queued:** PENDING-114 **(b)+(c)** — validation phase FIRST (hand-score Harrison/Mark vs Weil's *mentions*) before any corpus claim. **REVIEWED-98 drafted, awaiting placement.** Blockers on step 3: **PENDING-115**.
+> ⏳ **Steward-authorized, queued:** PENDING-114 **(b)+(c)** — validation phase FIRST (hand-score Harrison/Mark vs Weil's *mentions*) before any corpus claim. **REVIEWED-98 PLACED** (2026-08-08, verified clean). Blockers on step 3: **PENDING-115**.
 
 - [Session 2026-08-08 — `voice:` is the convocation key](session-2026-08-08-voice-is-the-convocation-key.md) — **The disposition that landed is not the one any single party drafted.** Grounded first, then read the twelve blocks *from the source* rather than their sidecar titles — which produced nearly every finding: **Surah LXIV not CXIV** (already propagated into two governance records, and it voided the jurist's worked note, built on a formula absent from the passage); **`quotation-poet-jurist` reclassified** by one footnote; the naming evidence for six of nine blocks sits **inside the fenced apparatus**, engine-unreachable. Option C **refuted by measurement** (omission → host voice). The steward's correction on language sent me back to `[^101]` and thence to **L850 — Mauss's own prose fenced inside the Havámál block**, missed by a check using **length as a proxy for authorship**. Corrected the jurist upward: their category pair belonged **out** of the convocation key (`glidden` spans 5 sources, `weil` 2 — measured). Caught `REVIEWED-113` before it entered the register (PENDING-110 rules the sequences independent). **REVIEWED-97 placed + verified clean · PENDING-114 authorized (b)+(c) · PENDING-115 filed · `824139d`.** 🔑 **Corrections ran in all three directions in one day** — and the fleet was still red the whole time.
 ## Historical reference → MEMORY-reference.md

claude/memory/session-2026-08-08-voice-is-the-convocation-key.md

@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ name them.** The gap was firing, not knowledge.
 2. THEN PENDING-114 (b): validation phase first — hand-score the known-positive
    (Harrison/Mark 16:7-8) against the known-negative (Weil's Gita/Upanishad
    MENTIONS, not quotations) BEFORE any corpus claim. (c) attached as ruled.
-3. Place REVIEWED-98 (draft ready, steward's hand).
+3. [DONE 2026-08-08] REVIEWED-98 placed + verified clean (L1080, 8/8 parts).
 ```
 
 **Other open horizons, ranked:**