session 2026-07-17: constitution block drafted-whole — #2/#4/#5 RATIFIED (REVIEWED-60/61, PENDING-60/61), verify-before-compose hook + memory, MEMORY.md compacted

2026-07-17 16:11:58 +02:00
parent 4bf7f1ad67
commit ed43422bbb
9 changed files with 171 additions and 20 deletions
@@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ Split out of [MEMORY.md](MEMORY.md) on 2026-07-06 to keep the wake-loaded index

 # Archived sessions + stable reference layer (relocated verbatim from MEMORY.md, 2026-07-06)

+## Archived (2026-07-17 — constitution block drafted-whole + verify-before-compose hook; demoted on promote)
+- [Session 2026-07-16 — constitution-close block, most of Block 1 closed](session-2026-07-16-constitution-close-block-most-closed.md) — Executed the block-discipline ([[feedback-constitution-as-block-then-pull-based-corpus]] + the new [[feedback-close-thoroughly-no-frequent-deferrals]] — steward: *frequent deferrals is how we came to the current state; close thoroughly*). Built the block-map (`_curation/constitution-close-block-map-2026-07-16.md`; **PENDING-46..57 all verified CLOSED**), then ran the §6 loop tail through the jurist **round by round — each pass caught a real thing, none resisted**: block-map ruling (#1 reconciliation MOOT → REVIEWED-58 gates on **residual-(b)** not a 128-run; 126→128; #6→**candidates register** not spec; #2 reclassified PROPOSAL+CTS-precondition; meta-lesson **"closable-now is a claim to check"**); OQ-3/OQ-5 (A3 gate = FLAG + **hard-floor-on-legibility**; decouple #1/#2 with a **checkable shed/inherit pair**); #1 light-gate PASSED (`anchors[]` *originates* in #2; `sections`/`provenance` = **produced-without-proof**); #3 A3 review PASSED ((a)-split evidence-alone-floors; **cold-instance AUDITS / jurist ADJUDICATES** — he *declined the auditor role*; **release mechanism** — I'd specified block not un-block). **CLOSED: #1 text (wiring→REVIEWED-58 on residual-(b)) · #3 A3 RATIFIED (REVIEWED-59, PENDING-59 filed) · #6 (datum-not-ledger=C-1) · #7 · #8 + PENDING-53 (records-drift caught by substrate-check — stale "owed/uncommitted" markers).** chamber **ahead-11** (Gitea/steward push). **⚠ PULLING THREAD: FINISH the block** — draw the CTS boundary + draft **#2 (citation amendment)**, then #4/#5, + land the ratified A3 into the spec (v2.1.0?); then corpus-into-spec opens. **FIRST MOVE: #2 — draw the CTS boundary FIRST** (internal CTS-URN allowed vs external CTS alignment leashed pending the tier survey). **LITERAL Q: does the CTS boundary separate cleanly, or does #2 need the withheld TEI/CTS/Perseus tier survey first?** Read the session file at wake. *[Superseded 2026-07-17: block taken to drafted-whole + mostly-ratified — #2 RATIFIED (REVIEWED-60), #4/#5 RATIFIED (REVIEWED-61), F-5 dispositioned; CTS boundary drew CLEANLY (B-confirmed). New thread: execute the block-close plan. See 07-17.]*
+
 ## Archived (2026-07-16 — constitution-close block, most of Block 1 closed; demoted on promote)
 - [Session 2026-07-14 midday — PENDING-55 positive test + residual-a FIX; jurist reviewed the whole sequence](session-2026-07-14-midday-pending55-positive-test-and-residual-a-fix.md) — The jurist **REVIEWED the whole sequence** and **REFUSED the §8 batch-authorization**, naming the document's own contradiction (a week of **3 steward-caught / 0 self-caught** errors used to argue for LESS per-item review — the contamination gradient in governance costume). Accepted; **posture restored: per-item review; §8 = register, not authorization.** Ran **PENDING-55 verify-flow as a POSITIVE test** (not the grep the jurist rejected): the graduation gate **FIRES** on real corruption (Leg B: 200-word-corrupted candidate → FLAG→refused) + has **no skip path** at the door — *and* the test surfaced a real overreach the grep would have hidden: a single `ABSTAIN` covered both "no ground truth" (permanent) AND "V-TEXT source off-disk" (contingent), the latter **proceeding without a verbatim check**. Jurist ruled it **a FIX to land** (*a false ABSTAIN is as much a lie as a false PASS*): **split ABSTAIN (permanent, tier-level→proceeds) vs UNVERIFIED (contingent, run-level→HOLDS)**. **LANDED + tested + committed** — `dbcdcc0` (FIX) + `632057b` (doc-currency); **119/119**; 2 commits **unpushed** (steward's Gitea/push call). Other rulings recorded (dotfiles PENDING-55): residual-b→PENDING-58 precondition; PENDING-56-fallback **dormant**; datum-not-ledger **candidate-not-constitutional**; quarantine namespace designed-not-built. Self-catch: guessed PENDING-46 was the citation-amendment home → flagged-to-verify → it's CLOSED (the flag-before-assert habit fired). **PULLING THREAD (revised by the post-wrap planning exchange): the fork RESOLVED to the steward's block-discipline** ([[feedback-constitution-as-block-then-pull-based-corpus]]): finish the constitution as one clean block FIRST, THEN corpus-into-spec pull-based per engine phase. *[Superseded 2026-07-16: the block-discipline was EXECUTED — built the block-map (`_curation/constitution-close-block-map-2026-07-16.md`; PENDING-46..57 all closed), ran the §6 loop tail through the jurist round by round; most of Block 1 CLOSED (#1 gated+landed, #3 A3 RATIFIED REVIEWED-59, #6 candidates register, #7 firing constraint, #8+PENDING-53 records-drift-caught). New pulling thread: FINISH the block — #2 citation amendment (CTS boundary first) + #4/#5 + land A3. See the 07-16 session.]*