[FIX] §9 dead text struck; PENDING-159 amended with the jurist's correction

The item's loudest claim was wrong: §9 does not MANDATE the provenance loss PENDING-153
recorded. Thistleweld's provenance was lost because nobody thought to record it; §9
mandates only that the claim be the steward's, and never addressed provenance either
way. An omission being discovered, not a rule doing damage — which changes the remedy
from amending §9 to clarifying it. Left visible rather than rewritten.

Option 3 closed, and on better grounds than the item offered: not §11's shared
formation, but that a jurist reading his output would ADJUDICATE it, collapsing the
position into a fourth checker. 'The steward's judgement not to relay is not a
bottleneck; it's the mechanism' — the item had treated it as a limitation.

Option 2's unnamed cost recorded: a 'from outside' flag is itself a signal the reader
responds to, so it does not preserve provenance neutrally.

⚠ Nothing built for the jurist view, deliberately: a marker with an implementation is a
channel, and a channel is option 3 by the back door. Noted because the executor's reflex
on reading it was to reach for a script.

§9's 'executor or jurist yields the floor' struck to 'executor' per the jurist on their
own draft — dead text, since there is no floor to yield where the fool cannot speak.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J6hZXNYSxEfZseBGTni4sf

claude/governance/fool/BUDDY-PATTERN-jurist-draft-v2-2026-08-22.md

@@ -368,8 +368,15 @@ unreliable. Plan for that rather than discovering it.
 - **ONE LINE** for the ordinary case. Paragraph-length governance prose is the
   genre the trio already metabolizes; the constraint is what keeps the fool
   uningestible.
-- **Named invocation:** the steward calls it by name, the executor or jurist
-  yields the floor, the fool answers at length.
+- **Named invocation:** the steward calls it by name, the ~~executor or jurist~~
+  **executor** yields the floor, the fool answers at length.
+  <!-- [FIX] 2026-08-25, jurist-specified on their own draft: "or jurist" is dead
+       text. The jurist has no substrate access (PENDING-82 open), so in a jurist
+       conversation the floor can be yielded and there is nobody to yield it to. The
+       executor is the only party that can. Struck rather than deleted so the next
+       reader sees a clause was retired and why, not a sentence that was always this
+       shape. Raised by the steward asking how the fool speaks to the jurist; the
+       substantive half of that question is PENDING-159. -->
 - `mute` / `off` available at all times. Mute rate may be counted; muting is
   never a fault.