session 2026-06-30 evening: PENDING-43 [ESCALATE] Loom/Mill two-register governance model

This commit is contained in:
David F Glidden
2026-06-30 21:42:35 +02:00
parent acd117d9e5
commit f53d2fc341
+9
View File
@@ -995,3 +995,12 @@ The Jurist's six-phase authorization map governs sequencing. Cross-cutting succe
**Recommendation:** Build the two normalizers (OCR + EPUB → one canonical form) next, apply to Levi / Alexander Book 4 / *La Chute*, commit the first spec-conformant graduation. The open voice-layer items are deferred and do not gate graduation (the graduates need conform only to §§II–V + the citation contract, not the undesigned manifest schema). **Recommendation:** Build the two normalizers (OCR + EPUB → one canonical form) next, apply to Levi / Alexander Book 4 / *La Chute*, commit the first spec-conformant graduation. The open voice-layer items are deferred and do not gate graduation (the graduates need conform only to §§II–V + the citation contract, not the undesigned manifest schema).
**Files affected:** `chamber-library/docs/chamber-library-specification.md` (ratified text applied); `studium-engine/docs/the-sidecar-typology-and-orchestration-2026-06-26.md` (new, exploration). **Files affected:** `chamber-library/docs/chamber-library-specification.md` (ratified text applied); `studium-engine/docs/the-sidecar-typology-and-orchestration-2026-06-26.md` (new, exploration).
**Awaiting:** Steward to write **REVIEWED-45** to close the loop on paper (the authorization was given live in conversation; like REVIEWED-44 for operations.yaml, the paper record is owed). **Awaiting:** Steward to write **REVIEWED-45** to close the loop on paper (the authorization was given live in conversation; like REVIEWED-44 for operations.yaml, the paper record is owed).
## PENDING-43 — [ESCALATE] Spec Loom & Mill "two-register genome" model would reshape our governance surfaces
**Date:** 2026-06-30
**Tag:** [ESCALATE]
**Summary:** Seb's instance's Loom/Mill methodology proposes a two-layer split — an append-only provenance archive vs. a lean *expressed* genome sized to the human's mental-model budget. We already run an instance of this (MemPalace ↔ MEMORY.md). Adopting it as a *governance* model would reshape PENDING/REVIEWED/MEMORY.md and potentially CLAUDE.md — a constitutional surface, and now a four-party question (David, Claude Code, Seb, Seb's instance).
**Rationale:** Two halves of one team independently re-derived one governance system (full map: `CapableMind-AI/docs/thinking/David/methodology/spec-loom-mill-reconciliation_2026-06-30.md`). The convergence is high-value, but the two-register adoption touches surfaces the executor may not alter unilaterally. Do not act; surface for steward + jurist + Seb.
**Adjacent (lighter, [PROPOSAL]-class):** a shared vocabulary map between the two pods (their genome/ratchet/compass/diseases/palette ↔ our taxonomy/ladder/Symmetria-flags/register) — cheap, high-value, recommended early; co-author from the governance field guide.
**Files affected:** none yet (mapped, not acted on). On authorization, would touch the governance surfaces above.
**Awaiting:** Steward + jurist + Seb. Do not proceed.