David/dotfiles
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

session 2026-08-05 evening: PENDING-102..107 + INC-2026-07-28-01 jurist package (read-only cross-repo pass)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
David F Glidden
2026-08-05 23:04:52 +02:00
parent 6c0092be4e
commit fb4e171d9e
12 changed files with 1310 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
claude/memory/MEMORY-reference.md
+8
View File
@@ -36,6 +36,14 @@ Split out of [MEMORY.md](MEMORY.md) on 2026-07-06 to keep the wake-loaded index
# Archived sessions + stable reference layer (relocated verbatim from MEMORY.md, 2026-07-06)
## Archived (2026-08-05 — the quoted tier accepts three of seventeen; demoted on promote at the 2026-08-05 evening wrap)
> ⛔ **NEXT SESSION = `PENDING-101`, the jurist's cross-repo research brief on UK AISI incident INC-2026-07-28-01** (steward-dispatched 2026-08-05 evening). **Read the item in full first** — it carries the brief verbatim (Phases 1 / 1.5 / 2 / 3, hard boundaries, Q1–Q4). **Read-only: no commits, no edits, no fixes.**
> ✅ **The PDF is READABLE — `Read` reaches `~/Desktop`, bash does NOT** (TCC `EPERM`): `Read('/Users/davidglidden/Desktop/6a724858f7db25c81487016d_Security Incident INC-2026-07-28-01.pdf', pages='N-M')`, ~36 pp. **No web search needed.** ⚠ Pages 1–3 already read, so the Phase 1 baseline knowingly includes the executive summary — declare that, don't claim a clean slate.
> ⚠ **Phase order is load-bearing:** Phase 1 (each repo's own account of its gating model, in your own words) comes **before** the report; a disagreement between the two passes is itself a finding. **The trap:** finding (1) — compaction converting stated uncertainty into carried-forward fact — maps so cleanly onto our wake/wrap that resemblance will feel like evidence. It is not; Q2 requires a synthetic test case.
> ⛔ Deferred to the morning after: the chamber thread, the retrieval measurement, the 5 skill-harvest proposals, **REVIEWED-87's placement**.
- [Session 2026-08-05 — the quoted tier accepts three of seventeen](session-2026-08-05-the-quoted-tier-accepts-three-of-seventeen.md) — **The engine's quoted tier measured against real human citation for the first time: 3/17 accepted, and the largest single cause is a FULL STOP, not markup** (+5 vs +3). `verify_quote`'s first production call — it located the known mislocation unprompted (`found-elsewhere: 1181`). **Four of my claims died today**: the markup framing; a census flag I raised→withdrew→had to UN-withdraw (the withdrawal *inferred a breakdown from a total*); a forward-window locator that reported a spurious uniform offset **twice** (Δ−30, Δ−25 — truth is Δ−1); and Q1's rationale, overturned by the jurist. **`fidelity_equivalence@3` RATIFIED + BUILT** (REVIEWED-87 drafted, **not yet placed**) — pre-registered 3/17→6/17, then measured exactly that; suites 22/22 · 43/43 · 24/24. **The conversion runbook has NEVER parsed** (8/8 commits; fixed `4f8ad64`). **PENDING-86 (a)+(d) built** — jurist given `chamber-spec` + `governance_search`; **the ruling changed materially the moment it could read primary text**, and its structural pass found REVIEWED-11/-12/-74 hidden from `item_spans` by indentation (steward unindented; 78→81 items). **The finding that cuts inward: the decisive §II.3 sentence was in my own read output and I did not surface it** — containment verifies that what you quoted is ACCURATE, never that you quoted what MATTERS; limit now written on the instrument. P5 executed (Δ−1 uniform, sha-bound, composite split applied); PENDING-99/100 filed. ⚠ Said *'Symmetria active'* at wake and never invoked it — decorative line, no ledger today. **PULLING THREAD unchanged and one day older: ask the corpus real questions.** Second consecutive day on scaffolding — every step steward-directed, so not drift as a choice, but drift as a result.
## Archived (2026-08-04 — the replay had never resumed; demoted on promote at the 2026-08-04 evening wrap)
- [Session 2026-08-04 — the replay had never resumed](session-2026-08-04-the-replay-had-never-resumed.md) — **four mechanism hypotheses proposed and refuted in one day** (sleep · entity timeout · drain gating · Ollama saturation); the steward's *"how can this be so persistently elusive?"* stopped a fifth being born. **The answer came from killing the replay and reading what it left at rest, not from profiling.** `minCursor = Math.min(...)` over **all 11** modules; `structured`+`training` have **never processed an event** (0 deferrals, 0 errors) ⇒ floor pinned at 0 ⇒ every start a full rebuild. **13/13 restarts, 6/6 rebuild, 0 catch-up — the resume branch has never executed.** Explains #65's *"fails differently each time"* and why every real rate fix (ANALYZE 6.4×, B1.1, N6) changed nothing: completion is gated by **uninterrupted run length**, not rate. **Recall never worked either — `retrieval_count = 0` across 19,915 nodes / 813,178 chains** (writer + call site verified live first); ingestion-never-completes and recall-never-worked are **one fact from two ends**. Replay **killed** (steward-authorized, premise re-verified, 2 verified backups); **BMF down and staying down**. PENDING-92/93/94 filed; note pushed to Seb (`CapableMind-AI@ad285df`). **L1 now blocked on Seb.** **PULLING THREAD: census 01 against the chamber/engine tooling** — sharpened question: *has this instrument ever produced a positive result at all?*