--- name: arc-open-work-register-the-single-verified-source-of-truth-post-stage-g description: "Consolidated, code-verified list of what remains OPEN on ARC after Stage G was sealed (2026-06-10). Reconciles the scattered tracking surfaces — the chronological tracker, the ~10 standalone project-arc-* files, PENDING.md, the spec's Phase-2/held set, and content sweeps — against actual code/live state. Built 2026-06-11 because the records had drifted BOTH ways (real open work hidden; done work mislabeled \"pending\"). Supersedes the standalone \"-pending\" files for STATUS; those remain for detail. The chronological narrative stays in project-arc-rework.md; this carries current open-work truth." metadata: node_type: memory type: project permalink: claude-memory/project-arc-open-work-register originSessionId: b85f1094-0658-47b4-a0ba-7a4323383aa9 --- # ARC open-work register **Single source of truth for what is OPEN on ARC.** Built 2026-06-11, ARC `main @ b220620`, live. Each item verified against code/live where marked **[verified]**; **[VERIFY]** = status uncertain, check before calling done. The rigorous spec↔code half is `/spec-code-audit`; this register also carries the content/governance/Phase-2 surfaces that audit does not. > **Why this exists.** Stage G (sealed 2026-06-10) closed the *spec*, not ARC's *work*. Open items were scattered across the tracker, ten standalone `project-arc-*` files, PENDING.md, the spec's held set, and content sweeps in no spec. On 2026-06-11 several of those surfaces proved drifted in both directions (the AldineXXI selector index listed shipped features as "planned"; "pending" files described done work; real work sat unlisted). This register is the reckoning. **Legend:** `[OPEN]` real remaining work · `[DEFERRED]` open by design, trigger-gated (Phase-2 / held / first-instance) · `[DONE—retire]` verified complete, the tracking file should be retired/archived · `[VERIFY]` needs a check. --- ## A — Open build work (the two undesigned-SVG-asset items the spec names but never realized) - **A1. Vignette (F+1) — the big remaining build.** `[OPEN]` **[verified]** — 0 `.vignette` rules in compiled CSS, nothing rendered. Spec ready: `vignette-specification.md` (revised 2026-06-07, PENDING-31; build-time SVG+CSS renderer, Phase-α engine, zero-JS, AldineXXI §IX). Brief: `drafts/vignette-spec-revision-brief-2026-05-28.md`. The largest open build; the steward named it as "the big thing left." - **A2. The cul-de-lampe — the designed Close ornament asset.** `[DONE 2026-06-17 — designed · first-instanced · rolled out to 7 essays · spec resolved]` — **the cul-de-lampe is live.** Confronted EB Garamond hederae (U+E001/E002, OFL), `.ornament.close`, **one text-em tall** (em-anchored, not constant — REVIEWED-42 consistency), `var(--fg)` opacity 0.7, CSS mask. Asset+rule+spec committed `d736df1`; rolled out (close on 7 essays; Vespers + Mushi-Ken reworked & **versioned**) in the follow-on commit. Close-only ruling: Essay/Hommage/Tombeau carry it; Fragment refused; Photo-essay declined; rest held-off (§IV *Which types carry the Close* + Sub-table 6, both reconciled). Placement = end of text proper, before Sources (apparatus spec). Publication mandate: every completed essay carries it. **The content half (B3) is now unblocked + started.** *Historical context (the long road to this) below:* — AldineXXI §IV names the *function* (Pause = rare within-piece breath, smaller scale; **Close = end-of-piece, the *punto finale*, full scale — "the visual signature of completion; *finis coronat opus*"**) but the **actual designed SVG cul-de-lampe is undetermined** — spec §IV *"Open question: the designed Pause/Close ornament itself"* **[OPEN — 2026-05-03]**, *"the asset itself is yet to be determined."* **[verified]**: compiled CSS still carries the *retired* classes (`.ornament.completion`, `.ornament.section`, `.ornament.chapter`, …) and has **no `.ornament.close`/`.ornament.pause`** — the asset was never designed, so the migration never ran (interim: the three-dot `.ornament` from the 06-07 hr doctrine stands in for Pause-at-threshold). Sibling to A1. Design sub-questions (one asset at two scales vs paired-distinct; motif lineage — Aldine cul-de-lampe vs Roman/Pompeian) in `project-arc-pause-close-ornament-and-hr-audit-pending`. The content half is **B3**. *(Caught by the steward 2026-06-11 — it was buried under the generic "ornament migration"; it deserves its own line as the crown of every finished piece.)* ## B — Open content sweeps (largely steward-owned, manual) - **B1. Glimpse location + title cleanup.** `[OPEN — steward manual]` **[verified]** — steward does this by hand (2026-06-11). 193 live glimpses; **4 lack `location:` frontmatter**; titles need a cleanup pass. NB the glimpse *rendering* bugs (phone full-bleed, no-vessel) were fixed + deployed in Stage M — this is content/metadata, not code. Absorbs the residual of `project-arc-apparatus-refactor-todo` Tier 3 (EXIF/location for existing glimpses — now ~done). - **B2. Threshold-`---` promotion walk.** `[OPEN — steward content track]` — apply the 2026-06-07 differentiated-hr doctrine across existing pieces: a bare `---` at a foreword→main-text *threshold* becomes `.ornament` (dots); `---` *within the body* stays silence. Doctrine + CSS settled (§IV amended, zero CSS change); the per-piece content walk remains. - **B3. Ornament content migration (Option A) — the content half of A2.** `[OPEN — gated on A2; scope VERIFIED 2026-06-11]` — steward ruled Option A (2026-05-03): once the cul-de-lampe asset exists (**A2**), migrate content off the retired-ornament classes onto the canonical Close/Pause, then retire the old SCSS. **Verified scope (sizable):** ~**95 content files** carry hand-authored `
` — `completion` ×51 (= the Close / end-of-piece, the cul-de-lampe's job), `section` ×50, `thought` ×14, `chamber` ×12, `musical` ×7, `hermetic` ×5, `mathematical` ×2, … Several variants (`thought`, `mathematical`) aren't even in the current CSS → they already collapse to bare `.ornament`. All retired per §IV; all await the designed asset. Not negligible, and not runnable until A2. Files: `project-arc-ornament-spec-vs-content-mismatch-pending`, `project-arc-pause-close-ornament-and-hr-audit-pending`. - **B4. Major content audit / archive of non-current files.** `[OPEN — was deferred]` — per ARC `CLAUDE.md` Known state: deferred until "the current version of the site is established; do not rearrange the content tree until that session." Stage G sealed arguably satisfies that condition now — candidate to schedule. - **B5. Rethink the versioning links.** `[OPEN — design reconsideration; steward-raised 2026-06-17, NOT for now]` — the steward feels something "doesn't sit right" about the version-stamp links and couldn't yet name it. Current behaviour (verified in built HTML): the piece-end stamp reads *"Begun [place] **[origin-date→/v/]** · Revised [place] [revised-date, plain]"* — the **origin date is the only link**, leading to the prior version; the `/v/` page announces "You are reading a prior version… Read current →." Executor's candidate diagnoses (offered, not settled): **(1)** the cul-de-lampe (a *completion* seal, *finis coronat opus*) and the version link pull opposite ways — the close says *done*, the link a few lines below pulls *backward* into the superseded version; adding the close may have sharpened a latent tension. **(2)** "Begun [date]" frames the link as inception/seed, but the destination is a *complete prior essay*, not a beginning — label/destination mismatch. **(3)** for pieces revised by *subtraction* (Mushi-Ken's appendix, Vespers' loudness), the linked prior is the version the author *improved away from* — disclosing *that* a revision happened is integrity, but making the discarded version the foot-of-page reading-*destination* may overreach: provenance offered as invitation. Hunch: it's #1+#3 — ADR-005 designed versioning as a *record*, but rendered as a link it behaves like a parallel reading-path, and that sits oddly under a completion mark. Revisit when the steward can name it. (Grounds: ADR-005, essay-versioning-specification.md §3–4; the version-stamp builder in `site.hs`.) ## C — Deferred by design (Phase-2 / held — trigger-gated, NOT drift) - **C1. Print/PDF posture + `arc-typography.sty` v0.3.** `[DEFERRED — Phase-2]` — build the Print/PDF LaTeX templates; update `tools/latex/arc-typography.sty` (v0.2, found stale vs current doctrine 2026-06-10) to current spec (posture-aware ragged/justified, Medium headings, 27.2rem measure, British quote-norm, xelatex glyph routing). Governs all future ARC PDFs. File: `project-arc-pdf-print-postures-session-plan`. - **C2. OpenType feature catalogue (§I.i.j).** `[DEFERRED — Phase-2]` — feature→CSS mapping; the Stage-G audit (06-09) enumerated the set; the session opens against it. (`zero` absent from every EB Garamond face — recorded.) - **C3. Held companions — Appendix D.** `[DEFERRED — Phase-2]` — Navigation Philosophy, Print Stylesheet, Footnotes — named, not drafted; reactive, no date. - **C4. §VII.d Footnotes / Endnotes.** `[DEFERRED — first-instance]` — research/parked pending the first essay that needs the register. - **C5. Held typographic options.** `[DEFERRED — held]` — justification (→ print spec), hanging-punctuation (→ browser Baseline), word-spacing (held at 0.20em default), reader font-size control (held; the banish-JS gate's one named exception). - **C6. Tombeau route.** `[DEFERRED — first-instance]` — governed-but-unsurfaced; route + Compass slot emerge with the first Tombeau piece (non-convergence). - **C7. Capsule apparatus.** `[DEFERRED — first-instance]` — deferred, not rejected; reopens when pedagogical-treatise content begins (§XII.e locks with first instance). File: `project-arc-capsule-apparatus-deferred-2026-05-05`. - **C8. Per-piece epigraph chancery features; metric-matched font fallbacks.** `[DEFERRED]` — first-instance (epigraph chancery `swsh+init+fina`) / empirical SCSS-audit candidate (font-metric overrides). ## D — Governance debt - **D1. Place outstanding REVIEWED entries.** `[OPEN — steward writes REVIEWED]` — PENDING-32 and PENDING-33 await REVIEWED placement; REVIEWED-36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 43 are drafted-for-placement (executed work, entries not yet placed). Constitutional: David/Claude.app write REVIEWED, not Claude Code. ## E — Stale "pending" files — verified DONE; retire or archive - **E1. `project-arc-breadcrumb-spec-pending`** → `[DONE—retire]` **[verified]** — breadcrumb componentized + governed permanent sibling (2026-06-03); `.breadcrumb` lives in `_navigation.scss`. - **E2. `project-arc-mimesis-acquisition-debt`** → `[DONE—archive]` — RESOLVED 2026-05-20 (stated in-file). Chamber-library import, not ARC-site work. - **E3. `project-arc-404-page-design-pending`** → `[DONE—retire]` **[verified 2026-06-11]** — **the file predates the §VII.h spec and is stale.** Apparatus §VII.h (ADDED 2026-05-20) governs the 404; `content/404.md` + built `_site/404.html` **conform exactly**: `