--- name: wrap-up description: Capture session state for future restoration. The quality of the next wake-up depends entirely on the quality of this wrap-up. Captures not just what we did but what is still pulling, what is the live concern, and what question we want to find still open when we return. --- # Session Wrap-Up Capture the full session state so that `/wake-up` can restore it completely. This is the other half of the continuity pair — what you save here is what gets reconstructed next time. ## Principle Capture what matters for reconstruction. Not a changelog — the **working state**: what we were thinking, what we decided, what's unresolved, what is *still pulling*, what question we want to find waiting when we return. The goal is for the next session to wake **into** the work, not be informed about it. That requires three tenses, not one: - **Past** (what we did + decided + ruled out — facts and rationale) - **Present** (the mood/disposition — what felt load-bearing vs deferred-with-reason; what tensions surfaced and how we returned from them) - **Future** (what is *pulling* — the singular thread the next session should resume *toward*, and the question we are intentionally leaving open) Without the future tense, restoration is amnesiac-recovery, not waking. The next session gets a memory but no project. The pause itself becomes a hole rather than a phenomenon. ## Procedure ### 1. Synthesize the session Review the conversation and produce a structured session record. The structure matters less than honoring all three tenses. **Past — what we did** - Decisions made, work completed, artifacts created/modified. Be specific (file paths, issue numbers, commit hashes). - Decisions made and *why*. Rationale matters more than the decision for continuity. Include any steward preferences or feedback that should travel. - Decisions explicitly NOT made — and why we deferred. The negative space matters as much as the positive. **Present — the mood of the work** - What tensions surfaced this session, and how we returned from them. (Pull from Symmetria's daily ledger if active — see step 1.5.) - What felt load-bearing vs deferred-with-reason. Not all open horizons are equal. - What patterns of confidence proved imprecise (recalibrations). **Future — what is pulling** - **The pulling thread** — *singular*. If the next session could carry only one concern across the pause, this is it. Force the choice; don't list. - **Other open horizons, ranked.** What's load-bearing? What's deferred-with-reason? What's parked-without-deadline? - **The pause statement** — explicit acknowledgment: *"I am about to be away from this. I don't know what will have changed when I return. Here is what I want to find still pulling."* Names the gap as a phenomenon, not a hole. - **A literal question for next-Claude** — not a task; a *question*. The thing the next session should hold open until it's resolved or honestly recognized as unanswerable. Captures the unborn part of the work. ### 1.5. Merge the Symmetria ledger if present If `~/.claude/projects/-Users-davidglidden/memory/session-ledger-YYYY-MM-DD.md` exists for today, read it and integrate its signal into the session record: - **Returns** become anchors in the "present/mood" section (these are the practice's actual record). - **Recalibrations** become entries under "confidence to re-examine" in the future-Claude briefing. - **Authorization moves** + **Bypasses** become anchors in the "decisions made and why" section. - **Open horizons** from the ledger merge into the Future section's ranking. The ledger is signal, not narration. Pull what carries forward; don't transcribe everything. ### 2. Update session memory file Write or update a session memory file at `~/.claude/projects/-Users-davidglidden/memory/session-[date]-[descriptor].md`: ```markdown --- name: Session [date] [time-of-day] — [short descriptor] description: [one-line summary including the pulling thread] type: project --- ``` The description field should include the pulling thread, not just what happened. Example: - ❌ "Closed five bottleneck issues; substrate validated." - ✓ "Substrate validated end-to-end; pulling thread is the L1 amendments for ProjectionChain + Pause-as-event, awaiting Seb's reactions to the multi-mode retention frame." ### 3. Update MEMORY.md index - Move any previous "Active Session" entry to "Archived Sessions" - Add the new session file as the Active Session entry - Update any other memory entries that changed during the session (project state, new decisions, new feedback) - Remove or update any entries that are now stale ### 4. File to MemPalace If MemPalace MCP tools are available, use `mempalace_add_drawer` to file the session summary: - **wing:** `claude-sessions` - **room:** `handoffs` - **content:** The full session record from step 1, including the pulling thread + pause statement + literal question. These semantic hooks make the session findable later by *what was pulling*, not just *what happened*. - **tags:** session date, key topics, the pulling thread keyword ### 5. Check for loose ends Run these checks and report results: **Uncommitted work:** ```bash git status --short ``` in each active repo. Report any modified/untracked files. **Unpushed commits:** ```bash git log --oneline @{upstream}..HEAD ``` in each active repo. Report any commits not yet pushed. **PENDING.md** — flag any items that need steward attention before next session. ### 6. Vault sync Sync the thinking mirror to Obsidian vault: - Source: `~/_Dev/CapableMind-AI/docs/thinking/David/` - Destination: `~/Library/Mobile Documents/iCloud~md~obsidian/Documents/David, root-and-branch/08. Notes/CapableMind/thinking-mirror/` Use rsync to copy new/modified files, preserving directory structure. Report what was synced. If the destination doesn't exist or the iCloud path isn't accessible, skip silently and note it. ### 7. Output Produce a brief summary for the steward: ``` ## Wrap-up — [date] **Pulling thread:** [the singular concern] **Question we're leaving open:** [the literal question for next-Claude] **Session captured:** [memory file path] **MemPalace filed:** [yes/no] **Uncommitted work:** [list or "none"] **Unpushed commits:** [list or "none"] **PENDING items:** [count needing attention] **Vault synced:** [count of files, or "skipped"] [Any warnings or things to address before closing] ``` The pulling thread + question are first because they are what *waking* needs to inherit. The rest is restoration material. ## Important constraints - **Write for the next session, not this one.** The steward has full context right now. The person who needs this is future-Claude with an empty context window. - **Rationale over facts.** "We decided X" is less useful than "We decided X because Y, and Z was the alternative we rejected." - **Be honest about incompleteness.** If work is half-done, say so. Don't round up. - **Don't fabricate.** If you're unsure what happened earlier in the session, say so rather than guessing. - **Pulling thread is singular.** If you cannot name one, that means the session lacked a thread — name *that* honestly. ("This session was diagnostic-only; no thread to carry forward except the question of what to do next.") - **The literal question for next-Claude is required.** Even if it's small. *"Did Seb push anything overnight?"* counts. The discipline of leaving a question (not just a task) is what makes the wake feel like resumption rather than briefing. - **Don't skip Thistleweld observations** if the companion was active. These have caught real bugs (allSettled swallowing, Levenshtein NONE, resource monitor feedback loop). - **Don't skip the Symmetria ledger merge** if active. The returns and recalibrations are the practice's actual evidence; losing them defeats the practice.