9.2 KiB
name, description, metadata
| name | description | metadata | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| session-2026-07-24-afternoon-levi-scale-application-pilot-ratified-reviewed-71-flag-1-now-gates-the-wave | Ran the born-digital lane against the RULED scale_application condition (REVIEWED-70 Q2) — first on work 13 (footnote-injection de-risk, no mutilation sites), then redone on the mutilation works 2/7/10 per steward direction, plus inter-work-interior + body-conservation. Jurist CONFIRMED the condition met (REVIEWED-71, legacy-witness-only grant) and caught a real §6 reasoning error I own: a 0-delete comparison against a SILENTLY-MUTILATED legacy witness cannot establish source-fidelity — so source-fidelity is UNDISCHARGED and Flag-1 (pin V-TEXT reference params) is now LOAD-BEARING. PULLING THREAD next session: close Flag-1 → clean source-fidelity verdict → unblock the 47-file V-TEXT wave. Warde graduation staged (V-SCAN, not blocked, ~90% — 2 OCR sites owe scan-adjudication). |
|
Session 2026-07-24 (afternoon) — the Levi scale-application pilot, ratified; Flag-1 now the gate
Woke into a brief pause (born-digital lane run was the set thread) and carried it all the way to a jurist-confirmed scale_application ratification — through three steward corrections and one jurist-caught reasoning error, each of which sharpened the result.
PAST — what happened + why
The born-digital lane RUN against the 14 verified brackets — the pilot the brackets gated.
- Footnote injection HOLDS at 14-work complexity. Whole-EPUB
convert_lane_borndigital.py(glyph precondition met, 9 substitutions) passed the driver's global teeth: 816 pairs → 331 injected all-non-empty, 0 mismatch/dup/intable. 32s. - First cut: work 13 (The Drowned and the Saved) — the wrap's set target. Answered the footnote-density + mechanical-tractability question (551→95 spans after a demonstrated escape-fold extension; 3 mechanical patterns; 0 loss). BUT work 13 has ZERO mutilation sites → it did not exercise the RULED condition's core (converter-better source-adjudication).
- Redone on the mutilation works 2/7/10 (steward-directed "redo in one of the applicable works"). Aggregate 148,262 witness words, 98.45% matched, 0 regression. converter-better: 8 sites, ALL source-adjudicated (w2 Wstawać ć×3 + Braşov ş×1; w7 Oświęcim ś+ę; w10 Wstawać ć×3 — read source EPUB
<img>at each, cross-checked the viewed glyph-map; Braşov = ş-cedilla, source-faithful, NOT "corrected" to ș). converter-worse 0; curation-to-carry un-exercised-with-reason. inter-work-interior DEMONSTRATED (positive test viaclassify(): inter-work drop→INTERIOR→FLAG; baseline PASS + leading-trim REVIEW as controls). body-conservation leg reproduces Eichmann Flag-1 (raw candidate FLAGs on MARKUP not prose). - Deliverables:
docs/scale-application-levi-pilot-REPORT-2026-07-24.md(self-contained, grounded — the jurist deliverable) + working artifacts in_curation/levi-second-pilot-2026-07-23/(witness_compare_levi.py, wc-levi-work{2,7,10,13}*.json, converter-better + inter-work-interior evidence).
The jurist confirmation (REVIEWED-71) — condition MET on all 4 legs; grant legacy-witness-only. Ruling filed verbatim docs/scale-application-levi-pilot-JURIST-RULING-2026-07-24.md; report Addendum applied. The jurist caught a real §6 reasoning error (owned): "no-prose-loss independently established by the 0-delete witness comparisons" is FALSE — the witness is the curation-preservation leg against a legacy witness (proves only no-regression-vs-prior-conversion, REVIEWED-70 Q1); against a witness silently mutilated in 8 places, 0-delete means only "lost nothing the MUTILATED conversion had" — CANNOT establish source-fidelity. I substituted the weaker, known-damaged anchor for the stronger obligation. ⇒ source-fidelity UNDISCHARGED; Flag-1 (pin V-TEXT reference params) is now LOAD-BEARING — no V-TEXT graduation runs before it closes. Also: record converter-worse UN-EXERCISED (not passed); the 485 "mostly CONTENTS" = inference-not-census; move the fold extension to declared data. Braşov + negative-control affirmed specifically.
Warde graduation staged (the "while we wait" task). Retrieved OCR from M4; cleaned via the governed normalize_ocr.py (check-for-tooling-first — the olmOCR path, precedent Mumford/Alexander): VERBATIM GUARD PASS, 222 page-markers dropped, 11 headings recovered. verify_conversion PASS. Placement canonical_texts/collections/typography/, distinct slug from short-text warde-crystal-goblet. Tier V-SCAN (body-conservation ABSTAINS → not blocked by Flag-1). Candidate at scratchpad/warde/the-crystal-goblet-sixteen-essays.md. 3 review sites: twerppography = deliberate Warde coinage (KEEP); popularlarity/himselv (Bible-typography essay) = possible OCR misreads → owe scan-adjudication before graduation.
PRESENT — the mood
The result was earned through correction, not despite it — three steward catches + one jurist catch, each turning a soft claim into a checkable one. The recurring drift this session was one shape, 3× (+ the §6 variant): assert from recall/derived-state without testing the substrate. (1) framed "legacy witness" as a discovery (it's the corpus's known universal condition — steward); (2) nearly built a jurist package for an ALREADY-RULED question (REVIEWED-70 — caught by reading scale_application's own declared data); (3) asserted "classifier blocks me from archive+graduate" from one recalled event (steward challenged → probe showed WRITE OK, I CAN graduate). The §6 error is the same family at the reasoning layer (used the damaged witness anchor to cover source-fidelity). The antidote that worked every time: read/test the substrate before asserting. The verify-the-source discipline was also where the pilot's best moment came — the Braşov cedilla adjudication (read the glyph, restore the source form, don't "correct"), which the jurist affirmed specifically. Steward preference honored eventually (concentrated), though this ran long (multi-part run + Warde).
FUTURE — what is pulling
PULLING THREAD: close Flag-1. The ruling made it load-bearing — no V-TEXT graduation (the 47-file kindle-residue wave, corpus-wide one-door) runs until the source-fidelity leg returns a clean verdict. Flag-1 = pin the V-TEXT reference-conversion parameters as declared data (so the reference matches the candidate's conversion, verdict reproducible + clean-file operating point PASS) + run the CLEANED candidate (clean_pandoc_html_residue + strip_cruft) through body-conservation → a clean PASS. This discharges the source obligation the §6 error left open and unblocks the wave.
ACTIONABLE RESUMPTION POINT (as of wrap — re-judge against what changed): REVIEWED-71 filed; ruling + report + Addendum filed in docs/; chamber-library working changes uncommitted (steward's repo/PR process — do NOT push to main). First move: read the Eichmann Flag-1 (the reference-parameter-pinning owed item, in one-door-eichmann-pilot-JURIST-RULING-2026-07-19.md §7 + the REPORT §7) + verify_body_conservation.reference_tokens_epub (what pandoc invocation the reference uses) → decide the pinning (make the reference conversion match the candidate's, or a defined relationship) → clean the whole candidate → re-run verify_body_conservation on the cleaned candidate → confirm PASS. Then the 485-census; then the wave.
Other horizons (ranked):
- Warde graduation (independent, V-SCAN, ~90%): render the source PDF, scan-adjudicate
popularlarity/himselv, then archive (archive_sources.py --add, I CAN do it now) + graduate + catalogue + sidecar → new typography canonical. The satisfying bounded close. - 485 unclassified footnote census (retire "mostly" — jurist flagged it as inference); 248-sample representativeness (owed from REVIEWED-70 before the ~5% rate plans the wave); fold extension → declared data; graduation-spec scale_application status → ratified (REVIEWED-71 housekeeping).
- Standing housekeeping: skill-harvest register compaction + ladder batch-append (register exceeds read caps).
PAUSE STATEMENT: I am about to be away. The ratification is banked (REVIEWED-71, ruling + report filed as files that survive the clear); Flag-1 is the named gate. What I want to find still pulling: Flag-1 as the live next step — pin the reference, clean the candidate, get the source-fidelity leg to a clean PASS, unblock the wave.
LITERAL QUESTION for next-Claude: When you pin the V-TEXT reference parameters and run the cleaned candidate through the body-conservation leg — does it return a clean PASS (discharging the source-fidelity obligation the §6 error left open), or does a real, non-markup source-fidelity divergence surface once the markup noise is stripped and the reference is matched? (The whole "no graduation before Flag-1" gate turns on which.)
State at wrap: chamber-library main @ 3852d46 (origin/Gitea 2 behind; working changes uncommitted incl. all pilot artifacts + ruling/report — steward's repo process). REVIEWED-71 filed. Warde staged (scratchpad). Ledger: session-ledger-2026-07-24.md.