First run of the reduction arm. Result: 4 of 47 assertive units survive.
D=0, Q=0, A=0 — in a real jurist ruling not one unit is demonstrated-in-document
and not one is a verbatim quote from a declared axiom source.
Census: PERFORMATIVE 12, BLEND 9, UNSOURCED-FACT 8, TESTIMONY 6, INHERITED 4,
UNSOURCED-QUOTE 3, PARAPHRASE 1.
§6.1 asked whether a heavy quarantine means the kernel is too strict or our prose
is full of unmarked assumptions. The census says neither: PERFORMATIVE and
TESTIMONY are 42% of quarantines and are categories the kernel has NO TAG FOR.
'Design gate PASSED' is not an undemonstrated claim, it is a determination true
by being uttered; 'I read CLAUDE.md in full' is testimony. A ruling that neither
performed nor testified would not be a ruling. So the finding is a GENRE
BOUNDARY — v1.0 models argumentative prose, a ruling is authoritative prose —
and that boundary is nowhere stated in the kernel.
Three gaps, one genre-independent: TESTIMONY, PERFORMATIVE, and PARAPHRASE.
PARAPHRASE is the one that matters — Q demands verbatim, and any document
reasoning from sources in its own words is untypeable. Plus a fourth,
structural: the §1 axiom set is too narrow to reduce anything real (12 of 43
quarantines are UNSOURCED-* or PARAPHRASE).
Deepest finding: §2c is satisfiable BY CONSTRUCTION but not BY REDUCTION.
Splitting a blend means rewriting someone else's sentence, which is where
translator bias lives. At 91.5% that is not reduction, it is authoring a new
document with the original as a prompt — so on this genre the reduction arm
COLLAPSES INTO the synthetic arm, inheriting its confirmation bias without its
convenience. The two arms were adopted because they fail differently; that is
the property at risk.
n=1 and stated as such. The package genre splits to 109 taggable units and is
NOT tagged. Falsifiable prediction recorded before the census: its Part I is
'Grounding (quoted verbatim)' and quotes CLAUDE.md directly, so Q should be
non-zero there where it was zero here.
Tooling: reduce.py + test_reduce.py, every gate shown FAILING on a fixture built
to break it. The splitter shipped with three defects, all found by contact with a
real document and none by review — third instance in three days: a '##' inside a
fence kinded as a heading, '---' rules taggable, and a '?' inside a quotation
splitting a sentence into a FRAGMENT. Fixed at v1.1.0 with regression controls;
the third fix's own risk (lower-case suppression) is recorded and controlled.
David F Glidden
1ebaf6aba5