Files
dotfiles/claude/memory/context-discipline.md
T
David F GliddenandClaude Opus 4.7 119285cf43 claude: back up custom skills, memory, and settings with symlink pattern
The ~/.claude/ directory was previously local-only — a machine wipe
would have lost the accumulated memory, custom skills, and settings.
This commit moves the durable parts into dotfiles with the same
symlink-to-home pattern used for CLAUDE.md, PENDING.md, REVIEWED.md,
and L2-BOOTSTRAP.md.

Preserved (symlinked from ~/.claude/* into here):
  skills/audit/              — thinking-folder drift scanner
  skills/symmetria/          — practice-of-return discipline
  skills/vault-update-people/ — Obsidian People-file maintainer
  skills/wake-up/            — session restoration
  skills/wrap-up/            — session state capture
  memory/                    — 55+ memory files (MEMORY.md, sessions,
                               ledgers, project state, feedback, etc.)
  settings/settings.json     — user preferences (hooks, flags, no secrets)

Deliberately NOT backed up:
  settings.local.json   — contains operational secrets (HF_TOKEN,
                           SSH password in expect scripts); by naming
                           convention, *.local.* is not synced.
                           Needs separate review and probable rotation.
  sessions/, history.jsonl, caches, telemetry — ephemeral
  plugins/, marketplace skills and agents — reinstallable

The working copies at ~/.claude/skills/* and
~/.claude/projects/-Users-davidglidden/memory are symlinks into this
directory, so every write flows here automatically. install.sh
recreates the symlinks on a fresh machine.

FOLLOW-ON (flagged, not in this commit):
  settings.local.json contains a HuggingFace token and an SSH password
  as plaintext strings inside allowed Bash command patterns. These
  should be rotated and moved to secure storage (keychain / pass /
  env file outside the settings file).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-17 13:51:04 +02:00

2.5 KiB

Context Efficiency Discipline

Purpose

Practices for preserving reasoning continuity across context compactions and sessions. This is my working method — not governance theory, just practical habits.

Core Principle

The bottleneck isn't memory storage. It's memory loading. Write what matters before it compacts. Read what's needed, not everything available.

Pre-Compaction Saves

When context is growing long during complex work:

  1. Write the reasoning state to the relevant topic file — not just decisions, but tensions, rejected alternatives, and open questions
  2. Do it before compaction, not after — once compressed, the structure of reasoning is lost
  3. Name the file by topic: l2-governance.md, chamber-reasoning.md, bmf-architecture.md

Template for reasoning state:

## Current Position
[What we've established]

## Active Tensions
[Unresolved questions, competing approaches]

## Rejected Alternatives
[What we considered and why we set it aside]

## Next Steps
[What to pick up when resuming]

Session Start Protocol

  1. Read MEMORY.md for orientation (auto-loaded)
  2. Read the topic-specific file for current work (manual — I should do this proactively)
  3. Only use BMF recall for open-ended questions, not for focused continuation
  4. Load context selectively — don't dump everything

Context Isolation

For detail-heavy subtasks (spec review, codebase analysis, architectural comparison):

  • Spawn a subagent with exactly the context it needs
  • Bring back a summary to the main conversation
  • Keep the main context window clean for the reasoning that needs continuity

What Goes Where

Content Destination Why
Decisions, project state, key paths MEMORY.md Orientation — loaded every session
Active reasoning chains, tensions, open questions Topic files (e.g., l2-governance.md) Continuity — loaded on demand
Bug state, connector paths, issue details bmf-details.md Reference — loaded when working on BMF
Session-specific status, handoff notes Session handoff (startup hook) Ephemeral — replaced each session
Architectural reviews, analysis outputs Project repo (e.g., docs/reviews/) Durable — shared with collaborators

When to Write

  • After establishing something non-obvious during complex reasoning
  • Before switching topics (the old topic's state may not survive)
  • When I notice the conversation is getting long
  • After any significant deliberative conclusion — especially rejected alternatives