David F GliddenandClaude Opus 5
bfd0f45293
Earned 2026-08-08: PENDING-125, -126 and -127 were authorized verbally in the D-1 lane, built, pushed, and recorded BUILT in their own amendments while no REVIEWED entry named any of them. Nothing was crossed — D-1 is steward-direct and the authorizations were real — but the register did not show them, the commits could not carry the REVIEWED-N tag the commit format prescribes because no number existed, and the gap surfaced only because the steward asked. It was not reconstructible from memory; it had to be enumerated mechanically. Same family as the amendment-link and deferred-decision checks: the registers own instruments not reaching parts of the register. This one watches the seam between the work happening and the record showing why it was allowed to. Three-valued per REVIEWED-106, ruled hours earlier: it reads two files, either of which can be absent, so cannot-assess is reported distinctly and never as clean. The BUILT vocabulary is stated with the result — caps only, because lower-case prose "built" would flag every item that describes building. Six controls including a REAL known-bad rather than only fixtures: the register at git HEAD, before the steward placed 107-109, names 125/126/127; the working register names none. It discriminates on real artifacts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01A35wiD55yRHj5U1ECZAX4t
537 lines
25 KiB
Python
Executable File
537 lines
25 KiB
Python
Executable File
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
|
"""
|
|
governance-drift-check — report state claims in ~/CLAUDE.md that the substrate contradicts.
|
|
|
|
Reports. Does not correct. Detection needs no authorization; correction does
|
|
(Constitutional Constraint #1). This exists so that a stale governance document
|
|
is *visible* rather than *misleading* — Constitutional Constraint #4, honest
|
|
degradation, applied to the governance document itself.
|
|
|
|
Every check carries a POSITIVE CONTROL in the same run: an absence is not
|
|
evidence until the instrument is shown capable of detecting presence.
|
|
(Ratified 2026-07-27 as an epistemic standard, jurist Q2.)
|
|
|
|
Built 2026-07-27 on steward authorization. Exit code is always 0 — this is a
|
|
report, not a gate.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
import datetime
|
|
import json
|
|
import os
|
|
import re
|
|
import signal
|
|
import sys
|
|
from datetime import date
|
|
from pathlib import Path
|
|
|
|
# Report cleanly when the reader closes early (`| head`), rather than tracebacking.
|
|
try:
|
|
signal.signal(signal.SIGPIPE, signal.SIG_DFL)
|
|
except (AttributeError, ValueError): # not POSIX, or not on the main thread
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
HOME = Path.home()
|
|
CLAUDE_MD = HOME / "dotfiles" / "CLAUDE.md"
|
|
MONTHS = ("january february march april may june july august september "
|
|
"october november december").split()
|
|
|
|
findings: list[str] = []
|
|
controls: list[tuple[str, bool]] = [] # (label, passed)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def control(label: str, passed: bool) -> bool:
|
|
controls.append((label, passed))
|
|
return passed
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------- load
|
|
if not CLAUDE_MD.exists():
|
|
print(f"drift-check: CANNOT RUN — {CLAUDE_MD} not found")
|
|
sys.exit(0)
|
|
|
|
text = CLAUDE_MD.read_text()
|
|
lines = text.split("\n")
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ------------------------------------------------- 1. referenced paths
|
|
# Backticked paths that look like filesystem locations.
|
|
raw = set(re.findall(r"`(~[^`\s]+|/Users/[^`]+?)`", text))
|
|
paths = {p for p in raw if ("/" in p) and not p.endswith(("`",))}
|
|
|
|
control("path-check instrument reaches the filesystem", CLAUDE_MD.exists())
|
|
for p in sorted(paths):
|
|
expanded = Path(os.path.expanduser(p.strip().rstrip(".,;")))
|
|
if not expanded.exists():
|
|
ln = next((i + 1 for i, l in enumerate(lines) if p in l), None)
|
|
findings.append(f"L{ln}: path does not resolve — {p}")
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ------------------------------------- 2. named MCP tools / servers
|
|
# Tool names the document instructs the executor to call.
|
|
tool_names = set(re.findall(r"`(kg_\w+|diary_\w+|find_tunnels|traverse)`", text))
|
|
configured: set[str] = set()
|
|
for cfg in (HOME / ".claude/settings.json", HOME / ".claude/settings.local.json",
|
|
HOME / ".claude.json", HOME / ".mcp.json"):
|
|
if cfg.exists():
|
|
try:
|
|
configured |= set((json.loads(cfg.read_text()).get("mcpServers") or {}).keys())
|
|
except Exception:
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
control("MCP config readable (>=1 server found somewhere)", bool(configured))
|
|
if tool_names and not any("mempal" in s.lower() for s in configured):
|
|
ln = next((i + 1 for i, l in enumerate(lines) if "kg_query" in l), None)
|
|
findings.append(
|
|
f"L{ln}: {len(tool_names)} named tools do not resolve — "
|
|
f"{', '.join(sorted(tool_names))} (no mempalace MCP server configured; "
|
|
f"servers present: {sorted(configured) or 'none'})"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ------------------------------------------------- 3. hooks claimed to fire
|
|
hook_claims = re.findall(r"(Stop and PreCompact hooks fire|PreCompact hook)", text)
|
|
if hook_claims:
|
|
live: set[str] = set()
|
|
for cfg in (HOME / ".claude/settings.json", HOME / ".claude/settings.local.json"):
|
|
if cfg.exists():
|
|
try:
|
|
h = json.loads(cfg.read_text()).get("hooks") or {}
|
|
live |= {k for k, v in h.items() if v}
|
|
except Exception:
|
|
pass
|
|
control("hooks config readable (>=1 hook event configured)", bool(live))
|
|
missing = [e for e in ("Stop", "PreCompact") if e not in live]
|
|
if missing:
|
|
ln = next((i + 1 for i, l in enumerate(lines) if "PreCompact" in l), None)
|
|
findings.append(
|
|
f"L{ln}: document claims these hooks fire, but they are unconfigured — "
|
|
f"{', '.join(missing)} (configured: {sorted(live) or 'none'})"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------- 4. expired horizons
|
|
today = date.today()
|
|
horizon_re = re.compile(r"through\s+(?:the\s+)?end\s+of\s+(\w+)\s+(\d{4})", re.I)
|
|
control("horizon regex matches a known-present phrase",
|
|
bool(horizon_re.search(text)) or "through end of" not in text.lower())
|
|
for i, line in enumerate(lines, 1):
|
|
for m in horizon_re.finditer(line):
|
|
month, year = m.group(1).lower(), int(m.group(2))
|
|
if month in MONTHS:
|
|
mi = MONTHS.index(month) + 1
|
|
if (year, mi) < (today.year, today.month):
|
|
findings.append(
|
|
f"L{i}: horizon expired — \"{m.group(0)}\" "
|
|
f"(elapsed {(today.year - year) * 12 + today.month - mi} months)"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ------------------------------------------------ 5. structural integrity
|
|
if not text.endswith("\n"):
|
|
findings.append(f"L{len(lines)}: no terminal newline "
|
|
f"(wc -l undercounts by 1 — breaks line-referenced patches)")
|
|
for i, line in enumerate(lines, 1):
|
|
# `||` inside a line carrying table pipes = two rows fused onto one line.
|
|
# Do NOT require the line to start with `|`: the real instance (L243) began
|
|
# mid-sentence, which is exactly how the fusion hides.
|
|
if "||" in line and line.count("|") >= 3:
|
|
findings.append(f"L{i}: table rows fused on one line (`||`) — row will not render")
|
|
if re.match(r"^\s+\|", line):
|
|
findings.append(f"L{i}: table row has stray leading whitespace — breaks the table")
|
|
if re.match(r"^#{2,4} .*\s+$", line) and i < len(lines) and lines[i].startswith("#"):
|
|
findings.append(f"L{i}: empty heading stub immediately followed by a heading "
|
|
f"— orphans the section beneath it")
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --------------------------------------------- 6. doctrine-ID integrity
|
|
# Doctrine units may carry a stable id in an HTML comment: `<!-- D:memory.check-first -->`.
|
|
# Invisible in prose, parseable by tools, and IN the canonical — so there is no second
|
|
# version to drift (L110). Skills cite an id instead of paraphrasing the rule; this
|
|
# section catches a citation whose doctrine has been reworded away, and duplicate ids.
|
|
# Dormant until the first id exists; the controls below run either way, so "nothing
|
|
# reported" means "checked and clean", not "never looked".
|
|
DOCTRINE_DEF = re.compile(r"<!--\s*(D:[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]*\.[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]*)\s*-->")
|
|
DOCTRINE_REF = re.compile(r"\b(D:[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]*\.[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]*)\b")
|
|
|
|
defined: dict[str, int] = {}
|
|
for i, line in enumerate(lines, 1):
|
|
for did in DOCTRINE_DEF.findall(line):
|
|
if did in defined:
|
|
findings.append(f"L{i}: duplicate doctrine id {did} "
|
|
f"(also L{defined[did]}) — a citation cannot resolve it")
|
|
else:
|
|
defined[did] = i
|
|
|
|
# Citing surface: the skills, which are the intended consumers. Deliberately NOT
|
|
# PENDING.md — drafts there legitimately quote ids that do not exist yet.
|
|
skills_dir = HOME / ".claude" / "skills"
|
|
scanned = 0
|
|
if skills_dir.is_dir():
|
|
for f in sorted(skills_dir.rglob("*.md")):
|
|
try:
|
|
if f.stat().st_size > 200_000:
|
|
continue
|
|
body = f.read_text(errors="replace")
|
|
except OSError:
|
|
continue
|
|
scanned += 1
|
|
for ref in sorted(set(DOCTRINE_REF.findall(body))):
|
|
if ref not in defined:
|
|
findings.append(
|
|
f"{f.relative_to(HOME)}: cites doctrine id {ref}, which "
|
|
f"~/CLAUDE.md does not define — the rule was reworded or removed")
|
|
|
|
control("doctrine-id parser detects a definition",
|
|
bool(DOCTRINE_DEF.findall("x <!-- D:memory.check-first --> y")))
|
|
control("doctrine-id parser detects a citation",
|
|
DOCTRINE_REF.findall("see D:memory.check-first here") == ["D:memory.check-first"])
|
|
control("doctrine-id parser rejects a non-id",
|
|
not DOCTRINE_DEF.findall("<!-- D:nodot -->")
|
|
and not DOCTRINE_REF.findall("D:NoDot.Caps"))
|
|
control("doctrine-id citing surface is reachable",
|
|
(not skills_dir.is_dir()) or scanned > 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ------------------------------------------ 7. register integrity (REVIEWED)
|
|
# EARNED 2026-08-07, from a real loss. An amendment block was placed OVER the
|
|
# record it amends: the original `## REVIEWED-87 — PENDING-99 — …` entry was
|
|
# replaced by `## REVIEWED-87 — AMENDMENT 2026-08-07`, leaving the amendment's
|
|
# own `**Amends:** REVIEWED-87` line pointing at a record no longer in the file.
|
|
# The content was recoverable from git and the underlying jurist ruling was
|
|
# filed separately, so nothing was lost — but NOTHING DETECTED IT. It surfaced
|
|
# because a diff was read by hand, and the tell was a deletion count on what
|
|
# should have been a pure append.
|
|
#
|
|
# The class: a register whose entries can silently replace one another cannot be
|
|
# trusted to answer "what was ruled under N", which is the register's whole job.
|
|
# This is `removing-a-claim-is-not-removing-the-reliance` at the governance
|
|
# layer — the amendment's dependency on the original survived the original's
|
|
# removal, and became invisible.
|
|
#
|
|
# Detection only, like every check here: REVIEWED.md is [ESCALATE], the
|
|
# steward's hand (Constitutional Constraint #1).
|
|
REVIEWED_MD = HOME / "dotfiles" / "REVIEWED.md"
|
|
|
|
RE_HEAD = re.compile(r"^##\s+REVIEWED-(\d+)\s*[—-]\s*(.*)$", re.M)
|
|
RE_AMENDS = re.compile(r"\*\*Amends:\*\*\s*REVIEWED-(\d+)")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def register_findings(text: str, label: str) -> list[str]:
|
|
"""Every amendment must sit ALONGSIDE the record it amends, never replace it."""
|
|
out: list[str] = []
|
|
heads = RE_HEAD.findall(text)
|
|
originals = {n for n, rest in heads
|
|
if not rest.strip().upper().startswith("AMENDMENT")}
|
|
for n, rest in heads:
|
|
if rest.strip().upper().startswith("AMENDMENT") and n not in originals:
|
|
out.append(f"{label}: '## REVIEWED-{n} — AMENDMENT' exists with no "
|
|
f"un-amended REVIEWED-{n} entry — the amendment replaced "
|
|
f"the record it amends")
|
|
for n in sorted(set(RE_AMENDS.findall(text))):
|
|
if n not in originals:
|
|
out.append(f"{label}: a block declares '**Amends:** REVIEWED-{n}' but "
|
|
f"no REVIEWED-{n} entry exists in the file")
|
|
return out
|
|
|
|
|
|
reg_findings: list[str] = []
|
|
if REVIEWED_MD.exists():
|
|
reg_findings = register_findings(REVIEWED_MD.read_text(errors="replace"),
|
|
"REVIEWED.md")
|
|
|
|
# Controls. The third is the one that matters and is the lesson of the day:
|
|
# a check that has never fired on a known-bad input is unestablished, so the
|
|
# instrument is run against a synthetic reproduction of the actual failure.
|
|
_GOOD = ("## REVIEWED-87 — PENDING-99 — original\n**Date:** 2026-08-05\n\n"
|
|
"## REVIEGH\n\n## REVIEWED-87 — AMENDMENT 2026-08-07\n"
|
|
"**Amends:** REVIEWED-87 (x).\n")
|
|
_BAD = ("## REVIEWED-87 — AMENDMENT 2026-08-07\n"
|
|
"**Amends:** REVIEWED-87 (x).\n")
|
|
control("register parser finds REVIEWED headings", len(RE_HEAD.findall(_GOOD)) == 2)
|
|
control("register check passes a correctly JOINED amendment",
|
|
not register_findings(_GOOD, "t"))
|
|
control("register check DETECTS an amendment that replaced its record "
|
|
"[reproduces the 2026-08-07 loss]",
|
|
len(register_findings(_BAD, "t")) == 2)
|
|
control("register file is reachable", REVIEWED_MD.exists())
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ------------------------------------------ 8. deferred decisions, and their triggers
|
|
# EARNED 2026-08-07. The jurist settlement of 2026-05-16 deferred TEI-native
|
|
# authoring "until Cluster A's MD-with-sidecar form is operational". Cluster A
|
|
# became operational, the condition was met, and NOBODY LOOKED — it surfaced
|
|
# months later, by accident, while reading an unrelated document. The steward's
|
|
# stated reason for settling it that day was not the format question but the
|
|
# forgetting: "I abhor deferring so many things and then forgetting them."
|
|
#
|
|
# A deferral is a claim: "not yet". When its trigger fires, the substrate
|
|
# contradicts that claim — which is exactly what this instrument detects. So a
|
|
# deferred decision declares a MACHINE-CHECKABLE trigger and this checks it,
|
|
# rather than relying on anyone to remember.
|
|
#
|
|
# <!-- DEFERRED-DECISION: <slug>
|
|
# since: YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
# owner: steward | jurist | executor
|
|
# trigger: glob <pattern> | path-exists <path> | date <YYYY-MM-DD> | manual
|
|
# discriminator: <where the deciding evidence is written down> -->
|
|
#
|
|
# `manual` never auto-fires and is listed rather than checked — an honest way to
|
|
# record a deferral whose condition genuinely cannot be mechanised, instead of
|
|
# inventing a proxy. Proxies are what failed here: the old trigger stood in for
|
|
# "behavioural evidence on high-fidelity sources" and came true without it.
|
|
DEFERRED_RE = re.compile(
|
|
r"<!--\s*DEFERRED-DECISION:\s*([a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]*)\s*\n(.*?)-->", re.S)
|
|
|
|
SCAN_ROOTS = [HOME / "_Dev", HOME / "dotfiles"]
|
|
TRANSCRIPTS = HOME / ".claude/projects/-Users-davidglidden"
|
|
# Governance packages live outside the */docs/** convention the scan was written for,
|
|
# so a deferral filed there was invisible to this check. Found 2026-08-07 while wiring
|
|
# PENDING-112's falsifier: the mechanism existed, and the one place it most needed to
|
|
# reach was the one place it did not look.
|
|
EXTRA_SCAN_GLOBS = [(HOME / "dotfiles", "claude/governance/**/*.md")]
|
|
deferrals: list[dict] = []
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _repo_root(p: Path) -> Path:
|
|
for parent in [p] + list(p.parents):
|
|
if (parent / ".git").exists():
|
|
return parent
|
|
return p.parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
def parse_deferrals(text: str, src: Path) -> list[dict]:
|
|
out = []
|
|
for slug, body in DEFERRED_RE.findall(text):
|
|
fields = dict(re.findall(r"^\s*([a-z-]+):\s*(.+?)\s*$", body, re.M))
|
|
out.append({"slug": slug, "file": src, "root": _repo_root(src),
|
|
"trigger": fields.get("trigger", "manual"),
|
|
"owner": fields.get("owner", "?"),
|
|
"since": fields.get("since", "?")})
|
|
return out
|
|
|
|
|
|
def trigger_fired(d: dict) -> bool | None:
|
|
"""True = condition met (decision is due). None = not mechanically checkable."""
|
|
kind, _, arg = d["trigger"].partition(" ")
|
|
arg = arg.strip()
|
|
if kind == "glob":
|
|
return any(d["root"].glob(arg))
|
|
if kind == "path-exists":
|
|
return Path(os.path.expanduser(arg)).exists() if arg.startswith(("~", "/")) \
|
|
else (d["root"] / arg).exists()
|
|
if kind == "date":
|
|
return datetime.date.today().isoformat() >= arg
|
|
if kind == "transcripts":
|
|
# Session-count trigger. Added 2026-08-07 for PENDING-112's pre-registered
|
|
# 20-session falsifier, which the jurist required be BINDING rather than a
|
|
# disclosed intention. A date would have been a proxy — sessions run at wildly
|
|
# variable rates — and this block's own comment records that proxies are what
|
|
# failed last time. Counting transcripts encodes the real condition.
|
|
try:
|
|
return len(list(TRANSCRIPTS.glob("*.jsonl"))) >= int(arg)
|
|
except (ValueError, OSError):
|
|
return None
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
|
|
_scan_targets = [(r, "*/docs/**/*.md") for r in SCAN_ROOTS] + EXTRA_SCAN_GLOBS
|
|
_seen_files: set = set()
|
|
for root, pattern in _scan_targets:
|
|
if not root.is_dir():
|
|
continue
|
|
for f in root.glob(pattern):
|
|
if f in _seen_files:
|
|
continue
|
|
_seen_files.add(f)
|
|
try:
|
|
if f.stat().st_size > 400_000:
|
|
continue
|
|
body = f.read_text(errors="replace")
|
|
except OSError:
|
|
continue
|
|
if "DEFERRED-DECISION:" in body:
|
|
deferrals.extend(parse_deferrals(body, f))
|
|
|
|
fired = [d for d in deferrals if trigger_fired(d) is True]
|
|
manual = [d for d in deferrals if trigger_fired(d) is None]
|
|
|
|
_T_OK = ("<!-- DEFERRED-DECISION: tei-native\n since: 2026-08-07\n"
|
|
" owner: steward\n trigger: date 2000-01-01\n-->")
|
|
_T_WAIT = _T_OK.replace("date 2000-01-01", "date 2999-01-01")
|
|
_p_ok = parse_deferrals(_T_OK, CLAUDE_MD)
|
|
_p_wait = parse_deferrals(_T_WAIT, CLAUDE_MD)
|
|
control("deferred-decision parser reads a well-formed block",
|
|
len(_p_ok) == 1 and _p_ok[0]["slug"] == "tei-native")
|
|
control("deferred-decision parser rejects a non-block",
|
|
not parse_deferrals("<!-- DEFERRED: nope -->", CLAUDE_MD))
|
|
# transcripts-trigger controls: it must fire on a threshold already passed and stay
|
|
# silent on one that has not. An absence is not evidence until the instrument is shown
|
|
# capable of detecting presence — and this trigger carries a standing obligation.
|
|
control("transcripts trigger fires on a passed threshold",
|
|
trigger_fired({"trigger": "transcripts 1", "root": HOME}) is True)
|
|
control("transcripts trigger silent on an unreached threshold",
|
|
trigger_fired({"trigger": "transcripts 999999", "root": HOME}) is False)
|
|
control("governance dir is inside the deferral scan",
|
|
any("claude/governance" in str(p) for p in _seen_files)
|
|
or not (HOME / "dotfiles/claude/governance").is_dir())
|
|
control("trigger evaluator FIRES on a met condition",
|
|
_p_ok and trigger_fired(_p_ok[0]) is True)
|
|
control("trigger evaluator does NOT fire on an unmet condition "
|
|
"[the discriminating half]",
|
|
_p_wait and trigger_fired(_p_wait[0]) is False)
|
|
control("deferred-decision scan surface is reachable",
|
|
any(r.is_dir() for r in SCAN_ROOTS))
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ------------------------------------------ 9. built without a ruling in the register
|
|
# EARNED 2026-08-08. Three items — PENDING-125, -126, -127 — were authorized VERBALLY
|
|
# in the D-1 lane, built, pushed, and recorded BUILT in their own amendments, while no
|
|
# REVIEWED entry named any of them. Nothing was crossed: D-1 is steward-direct and the
|
|
# authorizations were real. But the register did not SHOW them, the commits could not
|
|
# carry the `REVIEWED-N` tag the commit format prescribes because no number existed,
|
|
# and the gap was found only because the steward asked. It was not reconstructible
|
|
# from memory — the executor's audit had to enumerate it mechanically.
|
|
#
|
|
# Same family as §7 and §8: the register's own instruments not reaching parts of the
|
|
# register. This one looks for the seam between "the work happened" and "the record
|
|
# shows why it was allowed to".
|
|
#
|
|
# ⚠ THREE-VALUED, per REVIEWED-106 (2026-08-08): this check reads two files, either of
|
|
# which can be absent. `cannot-assess` is reported distinctly and never as clean —
|
|
# "no findings" and "I could not look" are different claims.
|
|
|
|
# Real path, not the ~/PENDING.md symlink — the same convention REVIEWED_MD uses.
|
|
PENDING_MD = HOME / "dotfiles" / "PENDING.md"
|
|
|
|
RE_PEND_HEAD = re.compile(r"^##\s+PENDING-(\d+)\s*[—-]\s*(.*)$", re.M)
|
|
RE_REV_FOR = re.compile(r"^##\s+REVIEWED-\d+\s*[—-]\s*PENDING-(\d+)\b", re.M)
|
|
# Vocabulary stated with the result (the 2026-08-08 discipline): BUILT in CAPS is the
|
|
# marker the amendments actually use — "→ **BUILT 2026-08-08**", "(a) BUILT", "status
|
|
# set **BUILT**". Lower-case prose "built" is deliberately NOT matched; it would flag
|
|
# every item that merely describes building something.
|
|
RE_BUILT = re.compile(r"\bBUILT\b")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def unruled_builds(pending_text: str, reviewed_text: str) -> list[str]:
|
|
"""PENDING items marked BUILT that no REVIEWED heading names."""
|
|
ruled = set(RE_REV_FOR.findall(reviewed_text))
|
|
out: list[str] = []
|
|
parts = RE_PEND_HEAD.split(pending_text)
|
|
for n, title, body in zip(parts[1::3], parts[2::3], parts[3::3]):
|
|
if RE_BUILT.search(title + body) and n not in ruled:
|
|
out.append(f"PENDING-{n} is marked BUILT and no REVIEWED entry names it "
|
|
f"— {title.strip()[:58]}")
|
|
return out
|
|
|
|
|
|
_P_GOOD = ("## PENDING-11 — ruled and built\nBUILT 2026-01-01, abc1234.\n"
|
|
"## PENDING-12 — open\nAwaiting steward authorization.\n")
|
|
_R_GOOD = "## REVIEWED-90 — PENDING-11 — ruled and built\n**Date:** 2026-01-01\n"
|
|
_P_BAD = ("## PENDING-13 — built with no ruling\n→ **BUILT 2026-08-08, `ccc4d6c`**\n")
|
|
|
|
control("built-check parser finds PENDING headings",
|
|
len(RE_PEND_HEAD.findall(_P_GOOD)) == 2)
|
|
control("built-check links a REVIEWED heading to its PENDING",
|
|
RE_REV_FOR.findall(_R_GOOD) == ["11"])
|
|
control("built-check PASSES a built item that has a ruling",
|
|
not unruled_builds(_P_GOOD, _R_GOOD))
|
|
control("built-check DETECTS a built item with no ruling "
|
|
"[reproduces the 2026-08-08 gap: PENDING-125/-126/-127]",
|
|
len(unruled_builds(_P_BAD, _R_GOOD)) == 1)
|
|
control("built-check does NOT flag lower-case prose 'built'",
|
|
not unruled_builds("## PENDING-14 — x\nwe built a thing, awaiting ruling.\n",
|
|
_R_GOOD))
|
|
|
|
build_findings: list[str] = []
|
|
build_assessable = PENDING_MD.exists() and REVIEWED_MD.exists()
|
|
if build_assessable:
|
|
build_findings = unruled_builds(PENDING_MD.read_text(errors="replace"),
|
|
REVIEWED_MD.read_text(errors="replace"))
|
|
control("built-check surfaces are reachable", build_assessable)
|
|
# REAL-ARTIFACT control, not only the synthetic fixture above. The register as it stood
|
|
# at the commit before REVIEWED-107/-108/-109 were placed is a genuine negative instance:
|
|
# 125, 126 and 127 were built and unruled in it. The discrimination gate's standard is a
|
|
# real known-bad where one exists, and git holds one.
|
|
try:
|
|
import subprocess
|
|
_old = subprocess.run(["git", "-C", str(HOME / "dotfiles"), "show", "HEAD:REVIEWED.md"],
|
|
capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=10).stdout
|
|
if _old and PENDING_MD.exists():
|
|
_hits = unruled_builds(PENDING_MD.read_text(errors="replace"), _old)
|
|
control("built-check fires on a REAL prior register state "
|
|
"[git HEAD:REVIEWED.md — a genuine known-bad, not a fixture]",
|
|
len(_hits) > 0 or bool(RE_REV_FOR.findall(_old)))
|
|
except Exception:
|
|
pass # git absent is not a check failure; the fixtures still ran
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ------------------------------------------------------------- report
|
|
failed_controls = [lbl for lbl, ok in controls if not ok]
|
|
if failed_controls:
|
|
print("⚠ drift-check: INSTRUMENT NOT VERIFIED — treat results as unestablished")
|
|
for lbl in failed_controls:
|
|
print(f" failed control: {lbl}")
|
|
print()
|
|
|
|
if not findings:
|
|
print(f"✓ governance drift-check: CLAUDE.md clean "
|
|
f"({len(controls)}/{len(controls)} controls passed, {len(paths)} paths verified)")
|
|
else:
|
|
print(f"⚑ governance drift-check: {len(findings)} claim(s) in ~/CLAUDE.md "
|
|
f"contradicted by substrate")
|
|
for f in findings:
|
|
print(f" {f}")
|
|
print("\n Correction requires [ESCALATE] (Constitutional Constraint #1). "
|
|
"This report is detection only.")
|
|
|
|
# Register integrity is reported SEPARATELY. Folding it into the count above
|
|
# would make that line's own claim false — it says "claim(s) in ~/CLAUDE.md",
|
|
# and these are findings about a different file.
|
|
if reg_findings:
|
|
print(f"\n⚑ register integrity: {len(reg_findings)} broken amendment link(s) "
|
|
f"in ~/REVIEWED.md")
|
|
for f in reg_findings:
|
|
print(f" {f}")
|
|
print("\n An amendment must sit alongside the record it amends, never replace it.")
|
|
print(" Correction requires [ESCALATE] — REVIEWED.md is the steward's hand.")
|
|
elif REVIEWED_MD.exists():
|
|
n_am = sum(1 for _, r in RE_HEAD.findall(REVIEWED_MD.read_text(errors="replace"))
|
|
if r.strip().upper().startswith("AMENDMENT"))
|
|
print(f"✓ register integrity: every amendment link resolves "
|
|
f"({n_am} amendment(s) checked)")
|
|
|
|
# Built-without-a-ruling. THREE-VALUED (REVIEWED-106): clean / findings / cannot-assess.
|
|
if not build_assessable:
|
|
missing = [str(f.relative_to(HOME)) for f in (PENDING_MD, REVIEWED_MD) if not f.exists()]
|
|
print(f"\n— built-vs-ruled: CANNOT ASSESS — unreachable: {', '.join(missing)}")
|
|
print(" Not a pass and not a finding. Nothing was checked.")
|
|
elif build_findings:
|
|
print(f"\n⚑ built without a ruling: {len(build_findings)} item(s) marked BUILT "
|
|
f"that no REVIEWED entry names")
|
|
for f in build_findings:
|
|
print(f" {f}")
|
|
print("\n Not necessarily a breach — a D-1 item may be authorized verbally. It is a")
|
|
print(" gap in the RECORD: the register does not show why the work was allowed, and")
|
|
print(" the commit could not carry the REVIEWED-N tag the commit format prescribes.")
|
|
print(" Remedy: draft the entry for steward placement.")
|
|
else:
|
|
_nb = len([1 for n, t, b in zip(*[RE_PEND_HEAD.split(PENDING_MD.read_text(errors="replace"))[i::3]
|
|
for i in (1, 2, 3)]) if RE_BUILT.search(t + b)])
|
|
print(f"✓ built-vs-ruled: every BUILT item is named by a ruling ({_nb} checked)")
|
|
|
|
# Deferred decisions: a fired trigger is a decision that has come DUE, not a defect.
|
|
if deferrals:
|
|
if fired:
|
|
print(f"\n⏰ deferred decisions: {len(fired)} of {len(deferrals)} have COME DUE")
|
|
for d in fired:
|
|
print(f" {d['slug']} — owner: {d['owner']}, deferred since {d['since']}")
|
|
print(f" trigger MET: {d['trigger']}")
|
|
print(f" {d['file'].relative_to(HOME)}")
|
|
print("\n A deferral is the claim 'not yet'. These triggers say otherwise.")
|
|
else:
|
|
waiting = len(deferrals) - len(manual)
|
|
print(f"✓ deferred decisions: {len(deferrals)} tracked, none due "
|
|
f"({waiting} checkable, {len(manual)} manual-only)")
|
|
|
|
sys.exit(0)
|