2.8 KiB
name, description, metadata
| name | description | metadata | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reference-studium-engine-architectural-charter | The studium-engine's constitutional charter (the inversion · three cognitions · boundedness-as-trust · free-generate/tight-verify) — read it before building the engine. |
|
The Studium Engine Architectural Charter (born 2026-06-15) lives at
~/_Dev/studium-engine/docs/the-studium-engine-architectural-charter.md. Read it before building the engine — it's the constitutional document the specs must not contradict.
Core thesis: not a search engine that borrows a mind, but a mind bound to a memory it cannot falsify.
- The inversion — reasoner at the centre (the undiluted, structured, joint-inference asset), the corpus as its provenanced, BOUNDED memory. We had it inside-out (retrieval-centre, model fenced at the edge).
- Boundedness = the source of trust — finitude of the shelf so the inquiry can be believed; curation IS the engine's epistemology, not preprocessing (so this week's chamber-cleaning was the engine being born).
- Three cognitions: associative (model) / evidential (corpus) / evaluative (the human — load-bearing inside the architecture, the executor–jurist–steward triad applied to a library).
- Provenance is the generative core — genealogy, citation-migration, time as a first-class axis — the one faculty a trained model permanently loses.
- Objective = illumination, not retrieval — silence/tension/the-gap are first-class outputs; "honest-empty" is the point, not error-handling.
- Free the reasoner, tighten the verifier — easier to verify a claim than generate a true one; let it want to please, trust nothing un-grounded → dissolves contamination. CapableMind's governance thesis instantiated on a library.
- The voice = source + citation-constraint + perspective (the unit of chavruta/debate).
- The recursion — built with this discipline, the engine is a counter-example to The Making's thesis: a making that waits, that can be inherited. Dedicated to Lune (at the centre) and Kai.
Built corpus-agnostic. First real work = the L2 pattern-finder on The Making sequence (curate ~60 chamber works along the Making's five stations → surface grounded candidate primitives for the steward's judgment; David writes the testimony, the engine never drafts prose — the seed forbids it). The violin-technique treatise (450 yrs, 60+ sources, a pattern language of fundamental primitives → his pedagogical philosophy) is the same L2 module on a later corpus. Four layers: L0 corpus (built) · L1 retrieval primitives (mostly built+measured) · L2 aggregation/discovery — the pattern-finder (next) · L3 orchestration/voices/debates (frontier). See feedback-studium-engine-sixtus-v-collaboration.