PENDING-48 closed against the jurist ruling: V0 §2/§5 method-gate cleared with conditions; fidelity_equivalence@1 doctrine fork; diplomatic-gold flag resolved (modernized -> moot). Session ledger for 2026-07-05. REVIEWED-N entry owed (steward/jurist). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dsqe1x23NgWaRdiFWSotur
3.9 KiB
3.9 KiB
name, description, metadata
| name | description | metadata | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| session-ledger-2026-07-05 | Practice-of-return ledger maintained by /symmetria — returns, open horizons, recalibrations, authorization moves, sub-agent dialogues, bypasses. |
|
Session Ledger — 2026-07-05
Returns
- 2026-07-05T11:53 — Wake. Thread validity gate run before synthesis: CONFIRMED (no overnight movement; repos + dotfiles clean). Verified built-state and git state against the substrate rather than inheriting the June record — carrying last session's twice-held trust-prior-pass-frame reflex.
- 2026-07-05 — Verify-before-asking: the jurist's diplomatic-vs-modernized flag — resolved against the actual source files (glyph census: zero long-s/fold-ligatures/soft-hyphens across all gold) rather than assumed or relayed back as a question. Modernized → flag moot at present gold; caveat recorded for future diplomatic gold. Uses reach proactively (CLAUDE.md) instead of adding a round-trip.
Open horizons
- Engine (build day, Opus): V0 + N0 — the two contracts, together (plan §7). V0 = verifier contract + pre-registered thresholds → routes to the jurist (the one named D-1 exception). N0 tree contract must exist before any hand touches the Loeb extractor rebuild (reciprocal obligation, §3.4). N1 can proceed while V0 sits with the jurist.
- Corpus: Region 1.1 — the exclusion path, test-first, surfaced for jurist ratification (chamber corpus-work-map-2026-07-05).
- Held literal question: normalizer@N "unaltered" — engineering (D-1) or doctrine ("the bound must name the edition")? Will the jurist gate V0 clean, or does "what counts as the same words" surface an unanticipated ruling?
- REVIEWED entries owed for the PENDING-46/47 chamber arc.
- Skill-harvest backlog awaits a steward authorization pass (last full review 2026-06-05): notably
/model-handoff(proven end-to-end last session) andstudium-engine tool-evolution-log(home for V4's pattern-finder retro-gate review). - MemPalace 3.3.6 → 3.5.0 available (layers wake-recency fix #1630; likely wing-filter #1665). Read: hold through build day, run scheduled upgrade at a break.
Confidence to recalibrate
Authorization moves
- 2026-07-05 — PENDING-48 filed (
~/PENDING.md): routes Studium V0 (verifier contract) to the jurist as a method-gate — the one named D-1 exception (rebuild-plan §8.5). Two decisions surfaced, leans given not decided: §2 the "unaltered" equivalence relation (the held literal question; lean (B) normalizer@1, flagged possibly-doctrine); §5 the pre-registered V2 thresholds (CP-upper-bound; small-n honesty). Held at the boundary: no V1 code. - 2026-07-05 — V0 drafted (
studium-engine/docs/spec/v0-verifier-contract.md, DRAFT-awaiting-jurist) + N0 drafted (docs/spec/n0-navigation-tree-contract.md, D-1, inhabitable, no jurist gate). Both grounded in code read this session (normalizer@1, sidecar schema, coverage-ledger warrant), not the plan's prose. Uncommitted — commit+push held for steward's word (studium is D-1 direct-to-main; not explicitly asked to push). - Contamination watch honored: did not let V0 silently decide the doctrine question (surfaced with lean, marked jurist's); thresholds presented as pre-registered-pending-gate, not settled; resisted the pull to build V1 past the boundary.
- 2026-07-05 — Jurist gate CLEARED (both §2, §5), with conditions. Ruling recorded at source, not just relayed: V0 DRAFT→v1.0 (Ruling section); the
fidelity_equivalence@1fork landed incluster-a-data-model.md§5.1 (doctrine split visible at source, per the ruling's explicit instruction); PENDING-48 closed (REVIEWED entry owed). Standing conditions carried: proportional-expansion rule (§5), display↔threshold coupling (§5), diplomatic-gold caveat (§2). V1 + N1 now unblocked. Still uncommitted — commit/push held for steward's word.