Basic Memory v0.21.6 first sync over the live memory dir (steward-authorized live-dir trial, Option A 2026-06-06): adds permalink: to frontmatter, refolds long YAML description lines, strips final newlines. Bodies untouched — verified via full diff classification. From this commit forward, any diff in claude/memory shows only what Basic Memory or the session writes. Trial design: MemPalace untouched as incumbent; git status check on this dir at every wrap; end-of-day evaluation (recall quality, sync robustness, rebuild-from-files, malformed-file behavior). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.6 KiB
name, description, type, originSessionId, permalink
| name | description | type | originSessionId | permalink |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Session 2026-04-09 — External Auditor review, dialogue trial, memory palace study | Received External Auditor's assessment (Absorption Trap, Aesthetic of Rigor), filed dialogue trial briefs (deferred), completed memory palace source study (DN-RET-02, six findings for L1). Practitioner questions pending. | project | 5d8fa47d-6cf1-4a66-9ef6-a2a95f27f7dd | claude-memory/session-2026-04-09-memory-palace |
Session 2026-04-09
What we did
External Auditor anonymization — replaced remaining name references in governance docs (three-consequences.md, ICP-19, governed-self-diagnostic-intelligence.md). Context Note line 99 preserved as historical record per steward. Committed 0407339, pushed to CapableMind-ai/capableMind_docs. Updated both GitHub remote URLs from skemantix to CapableMind-ai.
External Auditor's review received — key challenges:
- CD-03 "living honestly" may be permission structure for status quo
- "Absorption Trap" — pre-naming failure modes creates epistemic immune system
- "Aesthetic of Rigor" — difficulty is not calibration (unnamed failure mode)
- Source selection biased toward sincere practitioner, missing tired/defensive/dumb-reasons observer
- Proposes "Veto Power" outside the vocabulary
Dialogue trial preparation — filed executor brief + override-recording instructions in l2-constitution/. Readiness assessment: invariants settled but not computationally operative; enforcement vocabulary defined but inert; override-recording proposed but not implemented. All deferred — steward prioritizing L1 work with Seb.
Memory palace study (DN-RET-02) — complete source study across Yates, Carruthers x2. Six findings:
- Memory is composition not storage — reframes recall quality
- Revisitation is compositional — confirms PENDING-17 retroactive re-evaluation
- Affect is locational mechanism (intentio) — reframes Q-2: not new computation but signal already computed and discarded
- Primary failure is disorder not forgetting — sharpens I-CF toward distinctness criterion
- Multi-palace — tradition silent, dead end
- Random access claimed but contested
Five practitioner questions for steward pending (score memorization under performance conditions).
What we decided — and why
- Context Note preserved — frames the turtles inquiry. Anonymization covers governance role, not historical record.
- Dialogue trial deferred — L1 stabilization is priority. Instructions filed for when ready.
- DN-RET-02 is inquiry not redesign — "trying to solve the problems, not create new ones."
- Reviewer package superseded — External Auditor worked from it, assessment received.
What's unresolved
- CapableMind-AI: committed and pushed (1e0f0dd). One untracked PDF (Craft_of_Thought_Meditation.pdf)
- BetterMemories.io: committed and pushed (d82060e). Clean.
- Chamber-library: 5 unpushed commits + 2 untracked PDFs (Bourdieu, Kruger/Dunning)
- ARC: unpushed b1f28d3, blocked on Gitea
- External Auditor's assessment: steward needs to decide what enters record, whether HOLD triggered
- Override-recording: authorized, deferred
- Practitioner questions: 5 questions pending
- L1: awaiting Seb's instructions
- Seb's docs: ~30 Luke references in team/advisory capacity
Thistleweld
- Flagged OCR whitespace waste. Led to Craft of Thought cleaning (11% token reduction).
Next actions
- Commit CapableMind-AI changes
- Respond to External Auditor's assessment
- Practitioner questions (score memorization)
- L1 work (awaiting Seb)
- Override-recording mechanism (when L1 stable)