session 2026-07-05: V0+N0 & exclusion-path ratified (REVIEWED-44–48 placed) + CLAUDE.md-freshness check + frontmatter census + PENDING-49 (library-science → jurist)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Dsqe1x23NgWaRdiFWSotur
This commit is contained in:
David F Glidden
co-authored by
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8
parent
9ca673fe50
commit
9fd129bfcb
+21
@@ -1006,6 +1006,7 @@ The Jurist's six-phase authorization map governs sequencing. Cross-cutting succe
|
||||
**Awaiting:** Steward + jurist + Seb. Do not proceed.
|
||||
|
||||
## PENDING-44 — Machine-readable graduation spec + validator (the enforced convention rail for the Chamber Library)
|
||||
**⟶ CLOSED 2026-07-05 — REVIEWED-44 placed by steward (formal close).**
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-07-01
|
||||
**Tag:** [HARDENING]
|
||||
**Summary:** Codify the Chamber Library graduation CONVENTIONS as machine-readable data (`chamber-library/_curation/graduation-spec.yaml`) consumed by every graduation, and enforce them with a validator (`scripts/verify_graduation.py`) that gates each candidate — conventions checked at the moment of action, not narrated in prose that drifts or gets bypassed.
|
||||
@@ -1015,6 +1016,7 @@ The Jurist's six-phase authorization map governs sequencing. Cross-cutting succe
|
||||
**Awaiting:** REVIEWED-46 placement by the steward. **Steward authorized verbally 2026-07-01** ("yes to pending/reviewed"); spec promoted drafts→governed and applied. REVIEWED text owed to close the loop on paper (as with REVIEWED-44/45).
|
||||
|
||||
## PENDING-45 — Family-D (stem-suffix) footnote handler added to clean_epub_residue.py
|
||||
**⟶ CLOSED 2026-07-05 — REVIEWED-45 placed by steward (formal close).**
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-07-02
|
||||
**Tag:** [HARDENING]
|
||||
**Summary:** Extended the graduation-rail's footnote converter with a 4th anchor family (stem-suffix: ref `[¹](#…_{stem})` ↔ def `[N.](#…_{stem}a)`, keyed by the globally-unique stem), unblocking the recovery of per-chapter endnote apparatus in z-library/Kindle-derived EPUBs. First use: reconverting Sennett *The Craftsman* (recovered 294 endnotes the prior calibre conversion had silently unlinked).
|
||||
@@ -1025,6 +1027,7 @@ The Jurist's six-phase authorization map governs sequencing. Cross-cutting succe
|
||||
**Awaiting:** steward acknowledgement (a tool addition within the authorized "build the tool the batch needs" discipline; recorded for the paper loop alongside PENDING-44).
|
||||
|
||||
## PENDING-46 — Spec gaps surfaced by the corpus-fidelity work + the generative-from-spec principle
|
||||
**⟶ CLOSED 2026-07-05 — REVIEWED-46 placed by steward (formal close).**
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-07-03
|
||||
**Tag:** [PROPOSAL] (gaps 1–6) + [ESCALATE] (gap 7, generative principle as governance)
|
||||
**Summary:** Two days of corpus-map + tool-fleet work surfaced 7 gaps between the chamber-library spec (§§I–XI) and lived experience; steward named the governing principle (Spec Loom / hic jacet): tools should be GENERATIVE from spec, marked once, mutable-after — not hand-carved beside it.
|
||||
@@ -1127,6 +1130,7 @@ DISPOSITION:
|
||||
⇒ §III was the LAST gating ruling. DOCTRINE PHASE COMPLETE — all gaps 1-8, generative principle, amendment process, three questions, §III posture ratified. Phase ② (draft spec v2.0 superseding version + generative validator) is UNBLOCKED. Remaining OPEN-marked (non-blocking): per-genre table (engineering), tier-2 numeric bar (calibration), the two held forks (in-band/sidecar; markdown/TEI-XML).
|
||||
|
||||
## PENDING-47 — Corpus stress-test pre-registration (thresholds gate before execution)
|
||||
**⟶ CLOSED 2026-07-05 — REVIEWED-47 placed by steward (formal close).**
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-07-04
|
||||
**Tag:** [PROPOSAL] (the stress-test protocol + its ruling-thresholds; jurist gate before any run)
|
||||
**Summary:** v2.0 is ratified doctrine; the corpus stress-test brings the ~2,041-work corpus to spec. First artifact = a PRE-REGISTRATION doc fixing ruling-thresholds BEFORE any test data is seen (the jurist's strongest safeguard, easiest to skip). Drafted: `docs/corpus-stress-test-pre-registration-2026-07-04.md`; jurist cover note `docs/corpus-stress-test-pre-registration-FOR-JURIST-2026-07-04.md`.
|
||||
@@ -1245,6 +1249,7 @@ Jurist disposition: **ratified with two required §1 corrections** (not as-submi
|
||||
**NEW WORKSTREAM (steward-surfaced 2026-07-05): frontmatter sweep at scale.** The v2 frontmatter spec (`graduation-spec.yaml`) was defined recently, well after most works entered the library → ~1,073 lack v2 frontmatter (+ the 4 FP canonicals' missing `source:`, + Region 3 no-frontmatter/stubs). **[needs-authorization]** — scope-first: a read-only gap census against the spec + a migration plan surfaced for authorization BEFORE touching files. **Honesty constraint (load-bearing):** provenance fields (`source`, `converted_with`, `date_converted`, `source_verified`) cannot be mass-fabricated for works whose provenance isn't known — derive the mechanical ones, mark the unknown honestly, curate the rest. Same anti-default discipline as the exclusion path.
|
||||
|
||||
## PENDING-48 — Studium Engine V0 (verifier contract) — jurist method-gate
|
||||
**⟶ CLOSED 2026-07-05 — REVIEWED-48 placed by steward (formal close).**
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-07-05
|
||||
**Tag:** [PROPOSAL] — routed to the jurist as a **method gate**. This is the *one named exception* to the engine's steward-direct D-1 governance (cluster-a-data-model.md §0; rebuild-plan §8.5, steward-ruled 2026-07-04): V0 defines *what the engine may assert as verified and when it must abstain*, and everything downstream inherits that standard, so the jurist gates the method before V1 (the byte-existence checker) is built against it.
|
||||
**Summary:** The V0 verifier contract + pre-registration is drafted (`studium-engine/docs/spec/v0-verifier-contract.md`, DRAFT). It fixes the claim taxonomy (quoted / constructed / synthesized / ungrounded → verdict registers) and — before any validation data is seen — the pre-registered thresholds for the multilingual/archaic validation (V2). Its D-1 companion, the N0 navigation-tree contract (`docs/spec/n0-navigation-tree-contract.md`), is written together with it (not jurist-gated); N1 may proceed while V0 sits with the jurist. **No V1 code written; the executor holds at this boundary.**
|
||||
@@ -1265,3 +1270,19 @@ Jurist disposition: **ratified with two required §1 corrections** (not as-submi
|
||||
**Files touched (recording the ruling):** `studium-engine/docs/spec/v0-verifier-contract.md` (v1.0 + Ruling), `docs/spec/cluster-a-data-model.md` §5.1 (the fork at source), `~/PENDING.md` (this close). **Still uncommitted** — held for steward review + push.
|
||||
**Next (unblocked):** V1 (`verify-quote`) against `fidelity_equivalence@1` + the §3 deliberate-mismatch suite; N1 (tree builder) in parallel. Standing conditions carried into the build: the §5 display-coupling, the proportional-expansion rule, the diplomatic-gold caveat.
|
||||
**Owed:** a REVIEWED-N entry (steward/jurist) recording this ruling — same as the PENDING-46/47 arc.
|
||||
|
||||
## PENDING-49 — Library-science frontier brief → jurist doctrine pass (constitutional-grade adoptions)
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-07-05
|
||||
**Tag:** RESEARCH / SCOUT — surfaced for the jurist's **doctrine pass** (contains NO proposals yet; the PENDING-22 pattern). Each advanced adoption becomes its own `[PROPOSAL]` → spec amendment via the ratified RFC-supersession process (PENDING-46 gap-7). **Steward-flagged 2026-07-05:** "this will touch the constitution — the jurist will need to see this and give a ruling."
|
||||
**Summary:** An adversarially-verified deep-research pass on the 2024–26 library-science frontier (`chamber-library/docs/library-science-frontier-brief-2026-07-05.md`; 28 sources, 24/25 claims confirmed, 1 refuted). Headline: the field mostly *confirms and names* what the Chamber already is; the Chamber is at or ahead on its central mechanisms; the frontier is thinnest exactly where the Chamber is most novel. But several adoptions **touch the ratified v2.0 constitution** and must go through the amendment loop before any spec change.
|
||||
**What touches the constitution, by level (the structured question for the jurist):**
|
||||
- **A — DOCTRINE-level (needs the jurist's doctrine pass):**
|
||||
1. **IFLA-LRM `Agent` + `Nomen` entities** — extends the §III addressing spine / work-identity model (couples to PENDING-47 item-4); a model amendment (voices as first-class entities; name-as-entity disambiguation).
|
||||
2. **Perspectival-classification licence (Berman→Olson)** — the epistemic *status* of the curation/classification scheme (the "unapologetically partial, names-its-viewpoint" stance); a preamble/thesis-level doctrine question.
|
||||
3. **CoreTrustSeal-level self-audit as the trust baseline** — the corpus's own trust-attestation posture (the spec's central thesis is trust-by-design); a governance-doctrine adoption + a succession/inheritability instrument.
|
||||
4. **Refuted-claim correction (record it):** the warrant for the Chamber's bounded, curated-for-one-steward *scope* comes from **critical classification (A2)**, NOT from the Santa Barbara "collections as data" statement (that claim was refuted, 1-2). Which pillar justifies the scope is a doctrinal precision the jurist should fix.
|
||||
- **B — SPEC-AMENDMENT gap-fill (lighter; FIX/PROPOSAL under the amendment process):** machine-readable `licence`/copyright status as a frontmatter field (graduation-spec.yaml, gap-filling); **PREMIS** as the borrow-vocabulary name for the preservation-metadata layer; "collections as data" as the framing term (near-zero spec change).
|
||||
- **C — already in a governance loop (don't re-route):** tamper-evident *text* provenance (`[GREENFIELD]`) is the studium engine's V0/`fidelity_equivalence@1` frontier (already jurist-ruled, REVIEWED-48); the VIAF/ISNI reconciliation *discipline* couples to item-4 (PENDING-47, its own routed [PROPOSAL]).
|
||||
**Honest coverage gaps (from the brief, not to be smoothed):** the AI-cataloging data point (LC ~99% structured / <50% subject) is *indicative, not adversarially verified*; TEI/CTS scholarly-edition tradition came back *under-surveyed* (the "TEI as later tier" plan neither validated nor challenged); Ranganathan faceted classification returned no surviving claim.
|
||||
**Files affected (on advancement):** `chamber-library/docs/chamber-library-specification.md` (A1/A2/A3 → amendment via supersession) and/or `_curation/graduation-spec.yaml` (B, gap-fill); each its own [PROPOSAL] + REVIEWED entry.
|
||||
**Awaiting:** jurist doctrine pass on the A-items (steward relay); confirmation that the B-items run as ordinary amendments; each advanced adoption re-enters as its own tagged [PROPOSAL]. **Nothing amends the spec until then.**
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ permalink: claude-memory/memory
|
||||
- [Be (laundromat)](project-be-laundromat.md) — canonical workstream tracker established 2026-06-08 (Seb-relay of locked decisions). Be = Skemantix startup (Seb+David) funding CapableMind's funding-ladder; **bridge, not venture**. Decisions LOCKED: entity/exit (CapableMind decoupled, grant-funded), pricing (Living $12.99/mo · Archive $69.99/yr · Memorial $49.99/yr · Renovate ~$199 · $8.99 floor), CF Self-Serve Agency + versioned-template-package infra. **a11y gate MERGED (Pat 100/100/100).** Pre-revenue: the WTP gate = renovate Pat → charge her. **Discipline: stop adding spec until the gate clears → nothing for executor on be until then.** Repo @ `f43a0fd`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Active Session
|
||||
- [Session 2026-07-05 — V0+exclusion-path built & jurist-ratified, then the library-science reframe](session-2026-07-05-chamber-engine-and-the-library-science-reframe.md) — V0+N0 (verifier & tree contracts) jurist-cleared — **`fidelity_equivalence@1`** fork — & committed (studium `4ad82d6`); chamber **exclusion path** ratified-with-2-corrections & the 4 FPs excluded (`b9a5d05`); two repo **CLAUDE.md** + a `/wrap-up` **freshness check** built; the **frontmatter census** scoped the sweep (332 non-Loeb, **3% conformant**; Loeb-out via Region-4; `date_converted`-derivable / `converted_with` the one true unknown); **REVIEWED-44–48 placed**. **PULLING THREAD: the steward reframed the day — 'a library must be MANAGED' → a deep-research pass (verdict: the Chamber is at/AHEAD of library science on its central mechanisms) → the constitutional-grade adoptions (LRM `Agent`/`Nomen` voice-spine chief) go to the jurist as PENDING-49 FIRST; the frontmatter sweep + tool adaptations WAIT on that doctrine pass — doctrine-before-tools-before-sweep (the ruling may add `agent_id`/`licence`, so sweeping first = double-touch).** chamber 3 commits unpushed (skemantix Gitea down).
|
||||
|
||||
## Archived (2026-07-05 — chamber+engine build → the library-science reframe)
|
||||
- [Session 2026-07-04 (night) — Fable stage-1 replan: rebuild plan produced, steward-ruled 5/5, committed](session-2026-07-04-night-fable-stage1-rebuild-plan.md) — The planned bounded Fable session, run to the scope-charter. Produced **`studium-engine/docs/stage-1-rebuild-plan-2026-07-05.md` @ `d968241` (pushed)**. Literal question ANSWERED: **no prior-plan↔v0.3 conflict** — built Steps 0–7 stand; the unbuilt tail resequences **verifier-first (V0–V4; multilingual validation V2 = the gating test, pre-registered) + tree-primary retrieval (N0–N4; only N4 + the classical wave wait for Loeb)**; three apparent conflicts resolved by composition. **Steward ruled all 5 surfaced points inline** (compose-reading confirmed: grounding navigates / discovery keeps depth-with-breadth verifier-gated · tier labels mandatory from V1's first output · **V0+N0 first, together** · fingerprint technique-shared/code-separate · **V0 jurist-routed — the one D-1 exception**); rulings recorded IN the plan §8. Instrument B named honestly: technique-seed, not drop-in (document-containment ≠ span-existence). **PULLING THREAD: tomorrow is pure build on two mapped fronts — Opus opens the engine with V0+N0 (V0 → jurist), the corpus with Region 1.1 (exclusion path).**
|
||||
|
||||
## Archived (2026-07-04 late night — the Fable replan)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: session-2026-07-05-v0-exclusion-path-built-jurist-ratified-then-the-library-science-reframe
|
||||
description: "A long build+governance day: Studium V0+N0 (verifier contract, fidelity_equivalence@1 fork) jurist-cleared & committed; chamber Region-1.1/1.2 exclusion path ratified-with-corrections & the 4 FPs excluded; two repo CLAUDE.md files + a /wrap-up freshness check built; the frontmatter census scoped the sweep (332 non-Loeb, 3% conformant, Loeb-out, date_converted-derivable / converted_with the one true unknown); REVIEWED-44–48 drafted→steward-placed. PULLING THREAD: the steward reframed the whole day as 'a library must be MANAGED,' triggering a deep-research pass whose verdict is the Chamber is at/ahead of library science — so the constitutional-grade adoptions (LRM Agent/Nomen voice-spine chief among them) go to the jurist as PENDING-49 FIRST, and everything schema-shaped (the sweep, the tool adaptations) waits on that doctrine pass. Doctrine-before-tools-before-sweep."
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
node_type: memory
|
||||
type: project
|
||||
originSessionId: 262afd69-82e0-4a5f-b0df-fcb93a288a6b
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Session 2026-07-05 — the chamber+engine build day that turned into a library-science reframe
|
||||
|
||||
Very long day (`/remote-control` → `/wake-up`, steward at machine mid-day). Two repos advanced through the jurist loop; the day ended by discovering the corpus needs *library management*, not just curation.
|
||||
|
||||
## PAST — what we did + why
|
||||
|
||||
**Engine (Studium) — V0+N0, jurist-cleared, committed.**
|
||||
- Woke into the mapped "build day": V0 (verifier contract) + N0 (navigation-tree contract), written *together* per rebuild-plan §7, grounded in the real code (`normalizer@1`, sidecar schema, coverage ledger) not the plan's prose. Files: `studium-engine/docs/spec/v0-verifier-contract.md`, `docs/spec/n0-navigation-tree-contract.md`.
|
||||
- V0 = the one D-1 jurist exception → routed via PENDING-48 → **gate CLEARED with 2 §2 corrections**: (1) fork the fidelity relation to **`fidelity_equivalence@1`** — its own frozen constant, jurist-gated per version, split from the D-1 retrieval-side `normalizer@N` (landed in `cluster-a-data-model.md` §5.1); (2) `result: verified` explicit required. §5 thresholds ratified (5/15/0.75 CP-upper-bound) + proportional-expansion condition + display↔threshold coupling. **Verify-before-asking win:** the jurist's diplomatic-vs-modernized-gold flag — I checked the actual gold files (all modernized, 0 fold-glyphs) → flag moot, rather than relaying it back. Committed studium `4140fad` (pushed) + CLAUDE.md `4ad82d6` (pushed).
|
||||
- **Next engine station (unblocked, held): V1** (`verify-quote` against `fidelity_equivalence@1` + §3 deliberate-mismatch suite) + **N1** (tree builder). Held for a focused session (steward call).
|
||||
|
||||
**Chamber — Region 1.1/1.2 exclusion path, jurist ratified-with-corrections, committed.**
|
||||
- Built the exclusion path (the pin's missing ABSENCE half). Jurist **ratified with 2 §1 corrections**: (1) exclusion → its own honest key `source_excluded:` (not a verdict inside `source_verified:`); (2) `result: verified` required on pins → migrated the 5 existing pins. Shared guard `_valid_attestation`.
|
||||
- **Region 1.2 applied:** the 4 no-source FPs excluded — **verify-against-substrate corrected the map**: all 4 are `confirmed-wrong` (concrete wrong candidate on disk), NOT "3 none-on-disk" (incl. reverie's same-author-wrong-work `suspect=False` blind spot — Poetics of *Space* for *Reverie*). Instrument-B 0/5 evidence each; source-matches.json change **bounded to exactly the 4** (315 others byte-identical). Committed chamber `b9a5d05`. 37/37 tests throughout.
|
||||
|
||||
**Meta-work:** two project-local **CLAUDE.md** files (chamber `2238b65` local, studium `4ad82d6` pushed) — pointer-style (chamber=governed, engine=D-1). **`/wrap-up` §1.6 CLAUDE.md-freshness check** built (event-based, not count-threshold; steward-authorized). REVIEWED-44–48 drafted to `~/Desktop/REVIEWED-drafts-44-48-2026-07-05.md` → **steward placed them** (formal close done; PENDING-44–48 annotated CLOSED).
|
||||
|
||||
**The frontmatter census (scoping the sweep, `[needs-authorization]`):** `chamber-library/_curation/frontmatter-census-2026-07-05.md`. 332 non-Loeb, **only 11 (3%) conformant**; Loeb (952) OUT (their frontmatter comes at Region-4 reconversion, steward-confirmed). Gap split: `lang`/`canonical`/`work` mechanical; **`date_converted` DERIVABLE (git first-add date, verified on a sample); `source` partial; `converted_with` the ONE genuine unknown** → the honest-unknown marker is scoped to it, not the whole trio.
|
||||
|
||||
**The reframe → the deep-research pass → PENDING-49.** Steward: "a library needs to be MANAGED — I was only curating." → I ran an adversarially-verified deep-research pass (111 agents, 24/25 claims confirmed). **Verdict: the Chamber is at/ahead of library science on its central mechanisms; the field mostly confirms & names.** Brief: `chamber-library/docs/library-science-frontier-brief-2026-07-05.md` (chamber `fd49422` local). Steward: "this touches the constitution — jurist must rule." → filed **PENDING-49** (RESEARCH/SCOUT → jurist doctrine pass, structured A/B/C by constitutional stakes).
|
||||
|
||||
## PRESENT — mood / disposition
|
||||
|
||||
A disciplined, high-throughput day where the governance loop held every time (V0→jurist, exclusion→jurist, PENDING-49→jurist) and verify-against-substrate paid off repeatedly (diplomatic-gold moot; the 4-FPs-are-confirmed-wrong correction; date_converted derivable; the map's summary corrected twice). The quiet through-line only surfaced at the end: *everything today was library-management work* (matching, provenance, exclusion, metadata) — which the steward named, and the research confirmed the Chamber had been re-deriving library science all along. One real infra snag: **chamber's remote is Seb's flaky `git.skemantix.com` Gitea** — web returns 200 but git push/ls-remote hang at the backend even fail-fast (NOT credentials); 3 chamber commits sit unpushed, safe locally. I corrected my own premature "pushed" claim honestly. Symmetria ledger carries the returns (verify-before-asking; trust-prior-pass-frame held).
|
||||
|
||||
## FUTURE — what is pulling
|
||||
|
||||
**PULLING THREAD (singular): the jurist doctrine pass on PENDING-49 — doctrine-before-tools-before-sweep.** The library-science adoptions are constitutional-grade; the whole downstream (the frontmatter sweep, the tool adaptations, the new authority layer) waits on the jurist's ruling. The sharp reason the sweep must wait: the authority ruling may add frontmatter fields (`agent_id`, `licence`), so sweeping first = filling ~320 files twice. Doctrine-first is both governance-correct and the redo we've avoided all day.
|
||||
|
||||
**ACTIONABLE RESUMPTION POINT (as of wrap — re-judge against what changed):**
|
||||
- **First thing:** steward relays **PENDING-49 + the brief** (`chamber-library/docs/library-science-frontier-brief-2026-07-05.md`) to the jurist for the doctrine pass on the four A-items (LRM Agent/Nomen voice-spine; perspectival-classification licence; CoreTrustSeal self-audit; the refuted-scope correction). PENDING-49 *is* the structured question. Optional: bundle the A-questions + brief into one paste-ready jurist file (offered; not required).
|
||||
- **While the jurist thinks (schema-independent, executor can proceed):** Region 2 (source hunts for the 4 excluded + `ulysses` verify) and Region 4 (Loeb reconversion).
|
||||
- **HELD for the ruling:** the frontmatter sweep (Phase M/P/C), Region 3 frontmatter repairs, and the authority-layer tool adaptations (tools are spec-consumers per gap-7 — spec amends first, tools regenerate).
|
||||
- **Engine:** V1 + N1 stand unblocked whenever the steward wants an engine session.
|
||||
- **Infra:** retry `git -C ~/_Dev/chamber-library push origin main` when skemantix recovers (3 commits: b9a5d05, 2238b65, fd49422); or ping Seb.
|
||||
|
||||
**Tool-adaptation shape (anticipated, contingent on the ruling):** author-as-STRING → author-as-ENTITY. A new authority registry (`_curation/authorities/`, each voice a first-class Agent w/ Nomens + VIAF/ISNI/Wikidata ids) = **item-4's work_id/scope pipeline given the LRM shape**; a `reconcile_agents.py` (= item-3 promoted, precision-over-recall); ripples into `match_sources.py` (keys on Agent-ID → the FP class solved by construction), `build_catalogue.py`, `graduation-spec.yaml` (+`agent_id`/`licence` fields + validator). Lighter: PREMIS-align provenance vocab; a CoreTrustSeal self-audit report generator.
|
||||
|
||||
**PAUSE STATEMENT:** I am about to be away — the night before the doctrine pass. What I want to find still pulling: the doctrine-first discipline *held* — the sweep NOT run ahead of the ruling (no double-touch), and PENDING-49 handed to the jurist as a structured question rather than a blob. The temptation on return will be to "make progress" on the sweep because it's mapped and ready; resist it until the schema is ruled.
|
||||
|
||||
**LITERAL QUESTION for next-Claude:** When the jurist rules PENDING-49, does the LRM Agent/Nomen adoption land as an *extension of item-4* — a single authority-layer PROPOSAL that adds `agent_id` to the frontmatter schema (vindicating doctrine-before-sweep) — or does the jurist rule Agent/Nomen *too heavy for a small personal corpus* (τὸ πρόσφορον), leaving the sweep free to proceed on the current schema? Either answer reorders the pile.
|
||||
|
||||
**Other open horizons (ranked):** REVIEWED-44–48 placed ✓ (done); the tripwire (CLAUDE.md staleness canary) proposed, build-on-evidence-of-need; PENDING-47 tail (item-4 work_id pipeline; Region 2/3; full archive reconciliation); the older parked items (PENDING-43 ESCALATE Loom/Mill; PENDING-27; the S-cluster; L1 PENDING-5/10 likely stale-retire).
|
||||
|
||||
**State at wrap:** studium `main` clean+pushed (4ad82d6). chamber `main` **3 ahead, unpushed** (skemantix down): b9a5d05 (exclusion arc) · 2238b65 (CLAUDE+census) · fd49422 (LS brief). CapableMind-AI ahead 1 = steward's pre-existing `addee62`. dotfiles: PENDING/memory to commit+push at §6.5.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user