memory: the Fool is superseded and the buddy pattern is authorized to run
MEMORY.md's pulling thread still read "one gate and two steward inputs from runnable" against the trial programme, which is a whole workstream out of date. Replaced with the beacon coordinates, the run-once constraints, and the distinction that decides everything — the buddy design removes the warrant test rather than passing it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JQKeKY9T9d95KpvHwwok8T
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
b7fba3bf0d
commit
a168ad41d2
@@ -164,3 +164,33 @@ type: feedback
|
||||
- **No beacon pulse fetched**, target or near-future. No dry run attempted.
|
||||
- Owed under §15b: state the zero-contribution in PENDING-89; open the v1 Chamber archive read as
|
||||
its own [PROPOSAL].
|
||||
|
||||
### Authorization moves — 2026-08-22, fourth batch
|
||||
|
||||
- **REVIEWED-125 + AMENDMENT 1 placed** (`38c4866f`), each committed on its own. Verified the
|
||||
amendment JOINS rather than replaces — original intact at L1968, placed text byte-identical to
|
||||
the draft, and the lone git "deletion" was only the `\ No newline at end of file` marker.
|
||||
- **⚠ THE BEACON RUN IS AUTHORIZED — once, 2026-08-25T12:00:00Z.** §13.6's block lifted; its
|
||||
stated condition (§5 ratification) was met.
|
||||
- PENDING-149 AMENDMENT 3 records nine dispositions + the binding execution constraints in one
|
||||
place, so the 25th does not depend on reconstructing them from three documents.
|
||||
|
||||
### Returns — 2026-08-22, fourth batch
|
||||
|
||||
- ⚠ **`git add -A` swept the steward's REVIEWED-124 placement (39 lines) into `acfbb9f`, a commit
|
||||
titled entirely about the fool seed rule.** Constitutional placement filed under the wrong
|
||||
heading in the log. NOT rewritten — pushed to two remotes, and rewriting pushed history is worse.
|
||||
Corrected by recording it, and by committing every subsequent placement alone.
|
||||
- **Did not assume the steward placed the draft verbatim** — diffed it. It matched. The habit is
|
||||
worth more than this instance: had they edited the beacon-block section (the one I flagged as
|
||||
theirs to decide), acting on my draft would have authorized a run they had not authorized.
|
||||
|
||||
### Open horizons — after the beacon
|
||||
|
||||
- §8 proportions (mumble rate — v2 says "low, fixed", **no number**) + the mumble-hook answer,
|
||||
daemon costed not dismissed.
|
||||
- `[FIX]` abandonment → retirement, deliberately after the beacon.
|
||||
- §8a body satisfying cond. 2 — variation from time or nothing, never content.
|
||||
- PENDING-89: write the zero-contribution in explicitly; open the v1 Chamber archive read.
|
||||
- ⚠ **The jurist ruled on pasted text, not the filed artifact** (`9aceed7f…` unverified from its
|
||||
side). PENDING-82/86 recurring, now inside a ruling.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user