REVIEWED-135 condition 6: three stale records corrected as one dated act

The dated steward act REVIEWED-132 §6 reserves for normalising a placed record. All
three Awaiting lines were false and had been for weeks; nothing in them turned on when
the dispositioning pass ran.

  PENDING-133 (parent) — read "Steward authorization" for four weeks while its own
  Status line, FOUR LINES BELOW ITS HEADER, recorded withdrawal by the proposer on
  2026-08-10. Every reader showed a withdrawn proposal as awaiting the steward, and on
  2026-09-05 it came within one act of being authorized as such.

  PENDING-133 AMENDMENT 1 — discharged by REVIEWED-135 and its AMENDMENT 1.

  PENDING-134 — ruled by REVIEWED-121, H3 disclosure placed at studium-engine 9221dd8.
  H1's condition was satisfied by REVIEWED-117 and the record never said so.

⚠ A CONFLICT IN THE AUTHORIZING TEXT, RECORDED IN THE RECORD RATHER THAN RESOLVED
SILENTLY. Condition 6 directs PENDING-134's line to name "the ruling that disposes of
it" and defers the id to condition 7; condition 7 was discharged as REVIEWED-121,
verified twice. AMENDMENT 1 point 6 instead restates it as `REVIEWED-116 point 5` —
the authorization for the identification pass, quoted verbatim 44 lines above it in
the same document, and not a disposition of PENDING-134. Written as REVIEWED-121 on
condition 6's operative words and condition 7's verified discharge; the discrepancy is
annotated at the line and reported to steward and jurist.

PENDING-134's entry sits in an append-only archive whose header says "do not edit
entries". This edit is made under a dated steward act, the stated exception, and says
so at the line.

Effect: the visible queue falls 56 -> 54, both PENDING-133 blocks detected by the
Awaiting-line closure anchor added yesterday. Instruments green: wake-digest 99
controls, drift-check 59/59, no new register-integrity finding from the placement.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X3L79vgAnt1x2kxvf23Qt7

PENDING-archive.md

@@ -3270,7 +3270,19 @@ Then §6.2's resulting state must be named, and there are two options: **(i) a p
 
 **Files affected:** `~/REVIEWED.md` (the doctrine entry, carrying H3's disclosure and (b)'s defeater) · `corpus/v2-stratum-tags.yaml` (re-tagging under whichever rule lands) · PENDING-131/132/133.
 
-**Awaiting:** Steward authorization, **after** the MCP restart makes §5/§6.2 independently readable (H1).
+**Awaiting:** nothing — **RULED by REVIEWED-121** (`## REVIEWED-121 — PENDING-134 — The whose-proposition
+test…`), and the H3 **disclosure placed 2026-09-05** at studium-engine `9221dd8`. H1's condition was
+satisfied by REVIEWED-117 and the record never said so.
+⚠ **A CONFLICT IN THE AUTHORIZING TEXT, RECORDED RATHER THAN RESOLVED SILENTLY.** REVIEWED-135
+condition 6 directs this line to name *"the ruling that disposes of it"* and defers the id to condition
+7; condition 7 was discharged as **REVIEWED-121**, verified twice (header read directly, and `'134' ∈
+ruled_pendings()`). REVIEWED-135 AMENDMENT 1 point 6 instead restates it as `REVIEWED-116 point 5` —
+which is the authorization for the **identification pass**, quoted verbatim 44 lines above it in the same
+document, and is not a disposition of PENDING-134. Written here as REVIEWED-121, on condition 6's own
+operative words and condition 7's verified discharge. The executor did not silently choose: the
+discrepancy is reported to the steward and jurist and is correctable from this line.
+⚠ This entry sits in an append-only archive whose header says *do not edit entries*. This edit is made
+under a dated steward act, which is the stated exception (REVIEWED-132 §6).  <!-- corrected 2026-09-06 under REVIEWED-135 cond. 6 as amended by REVIEWED-135 AMENDMENT 1 — a dated act, the exception REVIEWED-132 §6 reserves. -->
 
 ---