53 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
53 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
name: session-ledger-2026-07-04
|
||
description: "Practice-of-return ledger maintained by /symmetria — returns, open horizons, recalibrations, authorization moves, sub-agent dialogues, bypasses."
|
||
metadata:
|
||
node_type: memory
|
||
type: feedback
|
||
originSessionId: ddabaa91-446e-452b-95e6-08e298ad9328
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Session Ledger — 2026-07-04
|
||
|
||
## Returns
|
||
- 2026-07-04T12:20 — Audit-agent on the Explore recon (audit-agent discipline). Two load-bearing corrections against substrate: (1) agent's "graduate_to_canonical MISSING verify_conversion" is STALE — Wave 0 (f9cbb8e) wired both gates (lines 36-37); agent inherited pre-Wave-0 status from the compliance doc (records-drift-both-directions flag). (2) agent stopped one step short on seam 1: the ~1% FP estimate is derived from the matcher's OWN `author_disagrees` signal (self-agreement), which fires ONLY when the canonical surname is ABSENT — structurally blind to same-author-wrong-work (Bachelard Reverie→Espace, 60%) and whole/part (Proust whole→vol-III, 62%; Levi work→complete-works), both sitting UNFLAGGED in the 321 confirmed. This is the exact structural error of the "74% anchorless" premise. Verified by reading match_sources.py source, not the report.
|
||
|
||
## Open horizons
|
||
- 2026-07-04T23:00 — **Fable-5 planning session init** (the wrap's planned handoff; ~7-min pause). Sole deliverable: `studium-engine/docs/stage-1-rebuild-plan-2026-07-05.md` from the scope-charter (`stage-1-replan-scope-charter-2026-07-05.md`), then report-and-stop. Literal question held: does the prior stage-1 plan conflict with the v0.3 charter (navigate-don't-retrieve + two-tier verifier), and is the verifier-organ buildable now on Instrument B? Flag to hold: trust-prior-pass-frame (recurred 3× today) — read both docs at the scope of the claim before ruling conflict-vs-slots-cleanly. Multilingual-validation gate must not be skipped.
|
||
- 2026-07-04T12:05 — Corpus stress-test (thread confirmed at wake). First artifact = pre-registration doc (thresholds before data). Dependency order: source-matching reliability FIRST (independent, not self-agreement) → order-sensitivity (inject known-bad) → disambiguation edges. Small-batch before full 2,041. NOT single-perspective.
|
||
- Literal question held open: does the ~1% source-match false-positive hold under INDEPENDENT test, or is it optimistic like the "74% anchorless" premise was?
|
||
|
||
## Confidence to recalibrate
|
||
- 2026-07-04T14:20 — Steward offered spare weekly quota for deep parallel work while the ESCALATE waits on the jurist. Chose (of 4 options) the **work-identity & scope study** (FRBR/LRM/CTS/BIBFRAME/TEI → design for chamber work-identity + arms the jurist's scope-doctrine ruling). Rationale: the stress-test's failure classes (same-author-wrong-work, whole↔part, work↔collection) are ALL the one missing distinction — a solved problem in library science. This is the do-it-once foundation, parallel to the hold, not crossing it. NOT spinning up the heavyweight Workflow tool (no explicit opt-in); orchestrating with parallel research subagents + own synthesis.
|
||
|
||
## Authorization moves
|
||
- 2026-07-04T12:30 — Pre-registration doc drafted (`docs/corpus-stress-test-pre-registration-2026-07-04.md`), status DRAFT. Per its own §4, execution awaits steward/jurist confirmation of thresholds (pre-registration is void if revisable after seeing data). Surfacing to steward for threshold confirmation + jurist-first decision. Seam-1 grading to PROPOSAL/ESCALATE = normative (gate-change) → the loop is load-bearing here.
|
||
|
||
- 2026-07-04T23:55 — **Steward ruled all five §8 points inline ("agreed on all points" on the executor's leans):** (1) compose-reading CONFIRMED (+ code-enforced motion boundary); (2) fence posture CONFIRMED + tightening (tier labels mandatory from V1's first output); (3) order RULED V0+N0-first-together, then verifier-leads-with-interleave; (4) fingerprint core RULED technique-shared/code-separate (rule of three; notary = the future third consumer); (5) V0 RULED jurist-routed — the one named exception to engine D-1. Rulings recorded INTO the plan §8 (artifacts-are-the-handoff), committed + pushed `d968241`.
|
||
|
||
## Sub-agent dialogues
|
||
- 2026-07-04T12:45 — Jurist gate on the pre-registration = GATE-WITH-METHOD-CHANGE. Sharpening not rejection; every point landed. The Q2 statistics catch (point-estimate grading lets a 5%-bad corpus read clean ~40% of the time) I should have caught myself — verified P(0or1|.05,40)=0.399 before encoding the CP-upper-bound fix. Four revisions applied, doc LOCKED v1. Jurist also caught a quiet scope-narrowing I'd made (Loeb "no risk" vs "different risk") → Seam 1-bis. Good instance of the loop catching what one pass missed.
|
||
|
||
## Findings
|
||
- 2026-07-04T13:30 — **Seam 1 verdict: the ~1% source-match FP does NOT hold → ESCALATE-candidate.** N=40 random (seed 20260704), Instrument B (content-fingerprint) + human ruling. k=2 confirmed FP (`montaigne`: Zweig-bio←Montaigne-Essais, suspect=True-but-survived; `semaison-la`: Jaccottet vol1 59k-words←vol2 source, suspect=False = author_disagrees-BLIND, the random-sample instance of the structural class). p̂=5.0%, U₉₀=12.8% → ESCALATE by the locked rule; robust (k=1 → U=9.4%, still ESCALATE). Literal question answered: ~1% refuted, same shape as "74% anchorless." **Second finding (unbudgeted): stub canonicals** — leopold (5w) + naess (20w) are placeholder "canonicals," not graduated texts; 2/40 → ~15+ implied corpus-wide; a graduation-gate question. Verdict artifact: `_curation/stress-seam1-verdict-2026-07-04.md`. Seams 2-3 HELD per stop condition. Surfaced for steward/jurist ESCALATE ruling.
|
||
- 2026-07-04T14:00 — Full-321 magnitude + stub census (steward: recommend ESCALATE-move + quick census). STUB CENSUS corrected my extrapolation: 4 stubs total (not ~15) — all in contemporary_voices; census-don't-guess vindicated. FULL-321 B-pass: 35 flags, provisional triage ~10 confident FP + ~4 scope-class → ~3-4.5%, refutes ~1% at full scale. NEW: scope sub-class (whole↔part / work↔collection — Proust←VolIII, Quixote←Part1) + PROCESS GAP (4 FPs susp=True — author_disagrees fired but they stayed confirmed; the warning is not a gate). Jurist relay written: `docs/stress-seam1-ESCALATE-FOR-JURIST-2026-07-04.md`. Held full adjudication (ruling may reframe). Recommendation given, not barrelled past the loop.
|
||
- Tool-review (Instrument B, `scripts/stress_source_match_verify.py`): validated on known-wrong/known-right BEFORE trusting, then hardened 3× on real data (dir-epub → .xml-body-epub → thin/scanned-source guard). Two PASS-BUT-FALSELY-in-the-other-direction cases caught (baudolino/totalitarianism .xml bodies extracted empty; naess-pdf scanned). The tool doubles as the Axis-A production-gate prototype. → tool-evolution-log appended.
|
||
|
||
- 2026-07-04T15:00 — Jurist ESCALATE ruling received (differentiated remediation; ELEVATED the process-integrity finding above the FIX-list; RULED the scope doctrine asymmetric; unblocked Seams 2/3 precisely). Ran BOTH parallel streams the steward's compute enabled: (1) process-integrity investigation DIAGNOSED — no persistence mechanism at all (source-matches.json regenerates over any fix; no override layer; canonical has no authoritative source: field; meditations = 3-way divergence). Remediation = authoritative source: pin on canonical, MUST precede FIX-list. (2) work-identity study DELIVERED from 3 converging prior-art sweeps — all three traditions confirm the jurist's ruling; spine = "demonstrate identity by content not title" (the chamber thesis one layer up); specifies the Axis-A gates + the persistence pin + operationalizes scope via FRBR's "who created the grouping?" diagnostic. Both docs in docs/. The deep compute produced the do-it-once work-identity foundation. Held all builds for steward auth.
|
||
|
||
- 2026-07-04T15:40 — Steward challenged the study's build-default ("don't reinvent the wheel — integrate where we can"). Fair catch = the executor-build-default contamination shape. 3-agent OSS-verification sweep (maintenance+license checked LIVE). Governing principle: integrate substrate+enrichment, OWN spine+verdict (witness-not-notary, §IV applied to tooling). Corrected my OWN wrong hypothesis (MyCapytain dormant, not the integration I'd guessed). INTEGRATE rapidfuzz + recordlinkage + Wikidata/VIAF-enrichment; KEEP hand-rolled Instrument-B (verified already-asymmetric containment); BUILD the work_id spine + thin CTS parser; BORROW DTS-vocab + PROV. Doc: `docs/work-identity-tooling-assessment-2026-07-04.md`. Measure-don't-trust: run 100 works through Wikidata recon before leaning on the external axis.
|
||
|
||
- 2026-07-04T16:30 — Sequential item 1 (persistence layer) BUILT+TESTED. Steward challenge "design around or resolve?" → RESOLVED: checked what each hash binds (reading-index=canonical-.md-hash; pin=source-file-hash = DIFFERENT object) → apparent conflict was a naming collision → generalized hash-locality principle + distinct `source_file_sha256`. Verify-the-object-before-declaring-a-conflict; resolving beats designing-around (a good lesson, steward-enforced). Built attested_pin (bare≠pin, pipeline≠pin — jurist condition), 28/28 tests, backward-compatible (inert until fixes pinned). Awaiting jurist ratification of the principle. → item 2 next (35-flag scope adjudication).
|
||
|
||
- 2026-07-04T17:15 — Items 2+3 done. Item 2: 35-flag adjudication (11 confirmed FP, scope diagnostic applied, ratio holds = all FIX-class). Item 3: Wikidata measure — 27% auto/61% usable, BUT the measurement itself needed the discipline: first pass 2% was a query artifact (flat concat + type-constraint), caught by re-testing → structured query 27%. Measure-don't-trust applies to the measurer. Confirms work_id-spine-primary/Wikidata-enrichment. Sequence (items 1-3) complete; item 4 = jurist-routed separate PROPOSAL, not build-now.
|
||
|
||
- 2026-07-04T18:30 — FIX-list APPLIED + committed (64d39f6): 5 verified FP re-points pinned to Chamber Sources permanent home; ARCHIVE DE-CONTAMINATED (steward's permanent-home reminder surfaced that archive_sources.py had copied FPs under right slugs + dest.exists() locked them in — 5 wrong CS copies force-replaced). Deferred: 2 no-frontmatter, 4 needs-locate; full archive reconciliation owed post-gate. THEN Seams 2+1-bis (08a39a7): Seam 2 = FIX (bigram order-check catches all scrambles, multiset guard blind); Seam 1-bis = CLEAN (Loeb work-identity sound, 0/952 header + 20/20 content). Stress-test complete bar Seam 3 (DSL-gated). Corpus-fidelity risk = concentrated in non-Loeb match layer (remediated), not the Loeb bulk. Steward's two challenges this session ("design around or resolve?", "no OSS?") + the permanent-home catch each corrected a real default — the loop earned its keep repeatedly.
|
||
|
||
- 2026-07-04T19:30 — Steward corrected my picture: Seam-1-bis "Loeb clean" was work-IDENTITY only; the Loeb APPARATUS is flattened (a large separate gap) — trust-prior-pass-frame again (narrow test→broad claim). Corrected the committed doc non-silently (1e6e1cd). Rewrote the stale README to the v2.0 substrate (ac8a691). Then archive↔matches reconciliation audit (b73a5ec): 271/320 CS copies verified-correct (85%); genuine contamination ≈6 total (5 fixed + ulysses-joyce=study-guide-not-novel) ≈2% — BOUNDED, my "likely broader" fear NOT borne out. Corrected picture: THREE large gaps (non-Loeb source-match [priority], Loeb apparatus recovery [de-risked, dwelling-task], frontmatter migration 1073 files). 6 commits pushed this session.
|
||
|
||
- 2026-07-04T21:00 — Chamber wrapped (6 commits pushed). Pivoted to STUDIUM-ENGINE deep research (steward's choice, "after the substrate"). 6-front fan-out + built-on the 2026-06-27 prior sweep (107 agents) + the charter (v0.2). Produced: charter-update v0.3 proposal + research evidence base (`studium-engine/docs/…-2026-07-04.md`, uncommitted). Key syntheses: two-tier grounding (quoted=byte-existence-GUARANTEE via boundedness / synthesized=measured); verification-easier-than-generate does NOT transfer to a single LLM judge → deterministic-or-ensemble verifier; debate-is-theater→ground-voices-in-retrieved-passages+preserve-tension; measured-confidence (semantic-entropy); evidence-only human display; the edition-aware gate the jurist demanded is NOW provided by v2 work-identity; genealogy = composition-not-invention (4-layer stack, MPIWG-Sphaera nearest kin, semantic-conflation the risk). **THE OBLIQUE FIND (steward's Q): the whole AI-citation market checks metadata-existence NOT verbatim-fidelity-at-anchor → the corpus's unique capability = DEFERRAL ("searched vs deferred-to"); notary/callable-primitive/content-credentials-for-text.** STEWARD PUSHED to re-run the stalled retrieval agent through the v2 lens → REAL SURPRISE: "navigate-don't-retrieve" (2604.14572) — the engine's CTS/DTS tree IS the authored navigation structure a 2026 frontier result must distill; retrieval = navigate-the-tree not embedding-top-k = the literal §II inversion. My "confident it's covered" was a rationalization of the stall; steward's instinct was right. Both surprises integrated into the charter update.
|
||
|
||
- 2026-07-04T23:45 — **Fable session deliverable produced: `studium-engine/docs/stage-1-rebuild-plan-2026-07-05.md`** (uncommitted; report-and-stop per scope charter). Literal question ANSWERED: no genuine prior-plan↔v0.3 conflict — built Steps 0–7 stand; the unbuilt tail resequences (verifier organ first, retrieval reshaped tree-primary, dialogue behind both). Three apparent conflicts each resolved by composition: (a) defense-#9 construction vs post-hoc verifier = compose (construction primary, verifier covers synthesis + defense-in-depth); (b) embedding-demotion vs steward's depth-with-breadth = two-motions reading (grounding-retrieval navigates / discovery keeps breadth, verifier-gated) — FLAGGED for steward confirmation, touches his own 06-13 ruling; (c) fence vs empty-verified-tier = dev-on-slice-with-tier-labels, fence activates with ledger column — FLAGGED. Verifier IS buildable now (Instrument B = technique-seed, honestly not drop-in: document-containment ≠ span-existence); only canonical-anchor granularity + classical-language validation wait for Loeb Region 4. Trust-prior-pass-frame held: built-state verified against repo (grep `_balance_by_work`, manifest count 21), not the June record; navigate-paper's +19% explicitly NOT claimed before N3 measures it on our corpus. Charter path slip noted (chamber-library/PENDING.md → ~/PENDING.md).
|
||
|
||
## Bypasses
|