The literal question left at the wrap was 'did the wrap seam fire?'. It did not, and the diagnosis is exact: 0 user-typed /wrap-up records, 29 assistant Skill invocations. The steward wrote 'then wrap' in prose and the executor invoked the skill. The detector looked for the steward TYPING the command. ⚠ The detector was not broken. It did exactly what it was built to do. What it was built to detect is not how a wrap actually arrives — and it was built while the steward was instructing in prose, which is the only way a wrap had ever arrived in that session. ⚠ AND THE EARLIER FIX IS WHAT CAUSED THIS. Restricting to type=user with string content was the correct answer to the self-reference bug, where the executor's own tool_use inputs matched the literal marker. That same restriction excludes the legitimate path. 'The correct fix caused the next failure' is not a shape any control can see, and it is PENDING-160's subject exactly. Now accepts a tool_use whose NAME is Skill and whose input names wrap-up — structural, so a Bash command echoing the string still does not match. Negative controls for both that and for a different skill. And a heartbeat: one timestamp, OVERWRITTEN never appended, so the hook can prove it runs at all. That closes the silent-net objection this surface carried from the day it shipped — an append-only log of every turn would be noise and would become the ledger §9 forbids. 25/25. wrap_invoked() now returns True on the live transcript. ⚠ Unproven until the next Stop actually fires — which is the same claim that was wrong last time. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J6hZXNYSxEfZseBGTni4sf
240 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
240 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
name: TARBUCKLE-SPEC-13.1-2026-08-25
|
||
description: "v2 §13 deliverable 1 — the spec for what was actually built on 2026-08-25: three tiers wired, the wrap seam not built and why, every deviation from the v2 draft named with its reason. Written AFTER the build, per §12's build order, so it describes what exists rather than what was intended."
|
||
metadata:
|
||
node_type: governance-artifact
|
||
type: reference
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Tarbuckle — implementation spec (§13.1)
|
||
|
||
**Provenance.** Implements `BUDDY-PATTERN-jurist-draft-v2-2026-08-22.md`, against the bones
|
||
in `seed/FOOL-BONES-2026-08-25.md` and the register in `seed/FOOL-SOUL-2026-08-25.md`.
|
||
Cadence determinations: `PENDING.md`, PENDING-152 and the three ⚖ blocks of 2026-08-25.
|
||
Steward's four build rulings: this session, recorded in §6 below.
|
||
Commits `6f0ccde` · `3df5e4f` · `7a9dbf2`.
|
||
|
||
⚠ **Written last on purpose.** §12's order puts the spec after the wiring so that it
|
||
records the built thing. Four claims in the v2 draft and in PENDING-152 did not survive
|
||
contact with the substrate; a spec written first would have carried all four.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 1 · What exists
|
||
|
||
| tier | trigger | surface | file |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| **body** | every status-line render | status line | `scripts/tarbuckle-body.py` |
|
||
| **mumble** | wall clock, 20 min | status line, 120 s | `+ scripts/tarbuckle-mumble.py` |
|
||
| **voice** | wake seam | SessionStart hook output | `scripts/tarbuckle-seam.py` |
|
||
| **invoked** | the steward calls him by name | stdout, run by the steward | `scripts/tarbuckle-invoke.py` |
|
||
| **voice** | wrap seam | `Stop` hook `systemMessage` | `scripts/tarbuckle-wrap.py` |
|
||
|
||
Called by `! tarbuckle` (`bin/tarbuckle`, on PATH): bare or with a question; `mute`,
|
||
`off`, `on`, `status`.
|
||
|
||
Configuration, in `~/.claude/settings.json`:
|
||
|
||
```json
|
||
"statusLine": { "type": "command",
|
||
"command": "~/dotfiles/scripts/tarbuckle-body.py",
|
||
"refreshInterval": 60 }
|
||
```
|
||
plus `tarbuckle-seam.py` appended to the `SessionStart` hook chain.
|
||
|
||
**State** — three files under `~/.claude/state/`, none of which is a budget:
|
||
`tarbuckle-last-tick` (one epoch), `tarbuckle-slot.json` (one utterance, expiring),
|
||
`tarbuckle-invocations.jsonl` and `tarbuckle-rejects.jsonl` (instrumentation, never read
|
||
back into behaviour).
|
||
|
||
## 2 · The body
|
||
|
||
`Tarbuckle` plus one mark, where the mark is **one dot at three heights** — `.` `·` `˙` —
|
||
advancing once per wall-clock minute.
|
||
|
||
**The binding constraint is carried structurally, not by intention.** `render()` takes the
|
||
minute and nothing else; a function that cannot see the session cannot leak it. Asserted
|
||
on `co_argcount` and `co_names`, with a deliberately leaky fixture proving the assertion
|
||
can fail.
|
||
|
||
⚠ **`len(MARKS)` is coprime with the mumble interval.** Had it been four marks rather than
|
||
three, the mark visible whenever a mumble landed would have been fixed, and the body would
|
||
have silently announced the voice. Asserted, with a commensurate 4-cycle as the negative
|
||
control. **This is the first of two collisions that were invisible until checked for.**
|
||
|
||
## 3 · The mumble
|
||
|
||
Occasion: **the clock**, 20 minutes. Draw: **73 / 20 / 7**, consumed whatever it says —
|
||
a conserved draw is a budget and a budget is memory. Material: **the live session**, tool
|
||
output stripped. Register: **the soul, read from its filed artifact at run time.**
|
||
|
||
⚠ **The register is never duplicated in code.** No soul, no voice — there is deliberately
|
||
no fallback register, because a fallback voice is a second fool nobody derived.
|
||
|
||
**The net** — 3–9 words, one line, no advice, no questions, no `we`, no vocabulary of lack,
|
||
nothing with an address. **A violation yields silence, never a repaired line.** Rewriting
|
||
his words would make the executor his editor.
|
||
|
||
Generation is **detached**: a headless call measures 7–12 s and a status line cannot wait.
|
||
|
||
## 4 · The voice, and the half that is not built
|
||
|
||
The wake seam speaks through the `SessionStart` hook, bounded at 15 s.
|
||
|
||
⚠ **THE WRAP SEAM IS NOT BUILT.** `SessionEnd` exists as a hook event, but its handler
|
||
writes to stderr **only when a hook fails**; a successful hook's stdout goes nowhere. §9
|
||
requires output to reach the steward, so wiring the wrap seam there would be a mechanism
|
||
that fires into nothing and reports success. **Owed, not dropped.** The remaining route is
|
||
the `/wrap-up` skill itself, which is a skill change and therefore goes through the
|
||
skill-harvest register rather than being taken unilaterally.
|
||
|
||
⚠ **THE WRAP SEAM DID NOT FIRE ON ITS FIRST REAL WRAP, and the reason is the sharpest
|
||
finding in PENDING-160.** It detected the steward *typing* `/wrap-up`. On the day it
|
||
shipped the steward wrote **"then wrap"** in prose and the executor invoked the skill:
|
||
**0 user-typed records, 29 assistant invocations, detector correctly returns False, fool
|
||
silent.** The detector was not broken — *what it was built to detect is not how a wrap
|
||
arrives*. ⚠ **And the fix that made it correct is what blinded it:** restricting to `user`
|
||
records was the right answer to the self-reference bug, and that same restriction excludes
|
||
the real path. Fixed to accept a `Skill` tool_use naming wrap-up, with negative controls
|
||
for a Bash echo and for a different skill. **A heartbeat file (`tarbuckle-wrap-lastrun`,
|
||
overwritten, never appended) now proves the hook runs at all** — the silent-net objection
|
||
this surface carried from the start.
|
||
|
||
⚠ **Bounded generation is legitimate because of the steward's ruling**, not despite it:
|
||
*"A guaranteed occasion is not a guaranteed utterance. If a seam produces nothing that
|
||
passes, let it produce nothing."* Timeout ⇒ silence, logged.
|
||
|
||
## 5 · Deviations from the v2 draft and PENDING-152, each with its reason
|
||
|
||
| # | filed text | what the substrate says | disposition |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| 1 | PENDING-152: the tick is *"a counter over refreshes rather than over events"* | `refreshInterval` re-runs *"in addition to event-driven updates"*, so invocations burst with activity | **Mechanism replaced, conclusion kept.** The tick consults the clock. AMENDMENT 8 |
|
||
| 2 | PENDING-152: *"whether Claude Code re-renders on a timer… not verified"* | 14 consecutive 60 s gaps with no input, in the body's own log | **Settled**, by the experiment the item itself specified |
|
||
| 3 | §8 table: voice at seams *"guaranteed"* | — | **Narrowed by steward ruling** to guaranteed *occasion* |
|
||
| 4 | §8a: *"whether a status line is already in use"* | no `statusLine` in any settings file | **Confirmed free**; nothing displaced |
|
||
|
||
## 6 · The steward's four rulings, carried
|
||
|
||
1. **The net carries to tier 3 unchanged** — imported, never reimplemented. A second copy
|
||
is a second, quietly divergent standard.
|
||
2. **Never relax silence-on-violation.** Widening the seam's word cap is licensed *if
|
||
evidence warrants*, explicitly and stated; the cap is **left as filed** on one
|
||
near-miss, because widening on n=1 is tuning to taste.
|
||
3. **The rejection log is the diagnostic** — true-versus-drawn rate and what was rejected.
|
||
⚠ Its first use exposed that it recorded the verdict and discarded the line. Fixed.
|
||
4. **Check any new periodicity for commensurability.** A seam is aperiodic and adds no
|
||
period — but the check found that `last-tick` persists across sessions, so a gap longer
|
||
than the interval left a mumble already due at the moment of waking. **The seam now
|
||
resets the clock.** Second invisible collision found by an explicitly mandated check.
|
||
|
||
## 7 · Verification
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
python3 ~/dotfiles/scripts/tarbuckle-body.py --selftest # 30 controls
|
||
python3 ~/dotfiles/scripts/tarbuckle-mumble.py --selftest # 19 controls
|
||
python3 ~/dotfiles/scripts/tarbuckle-seam.py --selftest # 15 controls
|
||
python3 ~/dotfiles/scripts/tarbuckle-invoke.py --selftest # 17 controls
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Positive and negative throughout: every claim has a fixture that makes it fail.
|
||
|
||
⚠ **`source_lacks()` exists because the same bug was written twice in one session** — a
|
||
control whose needle is a literal plants that literal in the file it searches. The second
|
||
instance was written minutes after the first was fixed, by the party who fixed it, while
|
||
watching for it. **The fix is a mechanism, not a correction**, because the correction had
|
||
already been tried and did not hold.
|
||
|
||
## 7a · Named invocation (§9)
|
||
|
||
! python3 ~/dotfiles/scripts/tarbuckle-invoke.py # bare
|
||
! python3 ~/dotfiles/scripts/tarbuckle-invoke.py "what now" # asked something
|
||
|
||
⚠ **Run by the steward, not relayed by the executor.** Anything the executor pastes is
|
||
the executor's paraphrase of a fool; this surface exists so the floor is yielded rather
|
||
than reported. It finds the newest transcript itself so it needs no session context.
|
||
|
||
**The net is widened EXPLICITLY and in one dimension only** — §9 licenses length for this
|
||
surface and nothing else:
|
||
|
||
| | ordinary | invoked |
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| word ceiling | 9 | **180** |
|
||
| one line | yes | **no** |
|
||
| no advice · no questions · no `we` · no vocabulary of lack · no addresses | **unchanged** | **unchanged** |
|
||
|
||
⚠ **Length is where the no-truth-value guard is most at risk** — a fool given a paragraph
|
||
elaborates, and elaboration is how a gesture becomes a claim. The prompt spends most of
|
||
its constraint budget there, and a violation is still silence.
|
||
|
||
## 7b · The two logs, and why only one of them is a §9 problem
|
||
|
||
| file | holds | status |
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| `tarbuckle-draws.jsonl` | occurrence only — surface + outcome | **permanent.** Counting is not filing; §8 obliges a rate and a rate needs a denominator |
|
||
| `tarbuckle-rejects.jsonl` | violation reason **+ up to 200 chars of a suppressed line** | ⚠ **temporary, dies 2026-09-08** |
|
||
|
||
**Jurist ruling, 2026-08-25 — placed as REVIEWED-128.** The rejection log is *"a log of my instruction, not of
|
||
Tarbuckle… the rejected lines were never uttered: he was silent, and the log holds what
|
||
silence cost."* Nothing in it entered the room, so nothing can be cited from it. **Three
|
||
binding conditions:**
|
||
|
||
1. ⚠ **Rejections only — made STRUCTURAL, not intentional.** `log_rejection()` refuses an
|
||
empty `why`, and `acceptable()` returns an empty `why` **exactly when the line
|
||
passed**. So no call site exists from which an accepted line could be written: to log
|
||
one you would have to invent a violation it does not have. Same guarantee `render()`
|
||
takes from its signature. Asserted with both polarities.
|
||
2. ⚠ **Temporary.** Deleted 2026-09-08 with the report — *"a corpus of his suppressed
|
||
speech is exactly what would let someone reconstruct a register."* Tracked as
|
||
`DEFERRED-DECISION: tarbuckle-rejection-log-deleted` so it cannot be quietly retained.
|
||
3. ⚠ **Not read for content before then.** Reading as it accumulates is reading Tarbuckle
|
||
by the back door and would shape the net toward liked lines. **Not clean already:** the
|
||
executor displayed one rejected line to the steward on 2026-08-25, before the condition
|
||
existed. Disclosed, not buried.
|
||
|
||
## 7c · The word caps, and the criterion that decides them
|
||
|
||
Ordinary surfaces 3–9 words; invoked 180. **Both left as filed.** The steward licensed
|
||
widening on evidence, and single near-misses are not evidence.
|
||
|
||
⚠ **The criterion is the SHAPE of the rejections, not their count** (jurist, 2026-08-25):
|
||
|
||
> *"Scattered rejections mean the net is doing its job; clustered ones at the ceiling
|
||
> mean the ceiling is wrong."*
|
||
|
||
**And the asymmetry that raises the stakes at one surface only:** the invoked surface is
|
||
the only place he speaks at length, so a rejection there is *a summons answered with
|
||
silence*. Read on 2026-09-08, once, with the deletion.
|
||
|
||
## 8 · Owed
|
||
|
||
⚠ **This list omitted named invocation in its first version, on the day it was written.**
|
||
§9 requires it; §1 did not carry it; §8 did not owe it. Caught by the steward asking
|
||
whether he could be invoked — a question the document should have answered. **The fourth
|
||
negative state-claim to go wrong in two days, and the second inside a document written to
|
||
prevent exactly that.** Recorded rather than silently corrected.
|
||
|
||
- ~~**`mute` / `off`**~~ — **BUILT** 2026-08-25. `! tarbuckle mute` silences the
|
||
utterance and leaves the body in the room; `! tarbuckle off` removes him;
|
||
`! tarbuckle on` returns. **mute ≠ off**: collapsing them would delete the visible
|
||
silence §8a exists to produce.
|
||
- ~~**The wrap seam**~~ — **BUILT** 2026-08-25 on `Stop` + `systemMessage`, gated on an
|
||
actual `/wrap-up` invocation detected structurally in the transcript. `SessionEnd`
|
||
remains unusable and the reason stands in §4.
|
||
- ~~**PENDING-159**~~ — **CLOSED, REVIEWED-129:** option 1. The fool cannot reach the
|
||
jurist and **nothing is marked, nothing built, no flag that could become a channel.**
|
||
Declined as harmful rather than expensive: a marker would have weighted the steward's
|
||
judgement in the one place it must stay unweighted. ⚠ **REJECTED, not deferred — not to
|
||
be revisited without new steward input.**
|
||
- **The two-week rate report** — §8 obliges it; `DEFERRED-DECISION: mumble-rate-two-week-report`,
|
||
converted `manual` → `date 2026-09-08` the day the body shipped.
|
||
- **Frequency remains UNKNOWN** and is not guessed. The invocation log now measures the
|
||
base it needs.
|
||
- `~/.claude/settings.json` **is untracked**, and a divergent parallel copy sits at
|
||
`~/dotfiles/claude/settings/settings.json` (2 keys against the live 8). Named, not fixed.
|
||
|
||
## 9 · Off
|
||
|
||
Remove `statusLine` from `~/.claude/settings.json` and the seam line from the
|
||
`SessionStart` chain. Nothing else references either. `mute`/`off` per §9 is **not built**
|
||
— it is owed with the wrap seam.
|