David F GliddenandClaude Opus 4.8
3f9a89b00c
Basic Memory v0.21.6 first sync over the live memory dir (steward-authorized live-dir trial, Option A 2026-06-06): adds permalink: to frontmatter, refolds long YAML description lines, strips final newlines. Bodies untouched — verified via full diff classification. From this commit forward, any diff in claude/memory shows only what Basic Memory or the session writes. Trial design: MemPalace untouched as incumbent; git status check on this dir at every wrap; end-of-day evaluation (recall quality, sync robustness, rebuild-from-files, malformed-file behavior). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
4.2 KiB
4.2 KiB
name, description, type, permalink
| name | description | type | permalink |
|---|---|---|---|
| L2 Thinking Documents Index | Tracks David's L2 constitutional design notes and seed briefs — ideas captured for future development when L1 is reliable and L2 foundational work begins | project | claude-memory/l2-thinking-documents |
L2 Design Notes & Seed Briefs
All filed in CapableMind-AI/docs/thinking/David/l2-constitution/. L2 constitutional work has been active since mid-March 2026. Documents range from operational (DN-GOV series, ICP-19) to exploratory (seed briefs). First external review completed 2026-04-01 — see l2-review-state.md.
Documents
DN-RET-01 — Retention, Mutual Freedom, and the Baseness Problem (2026-03-19)
l2-constitution/DN-RET-01-retention-mutual-freedom-baseness.md
- Harrison provocation → four threads: L1 as retention not memory, mutual opacity, freedom-through-constraint, human baseness
- Generated L1-DIAG-03 (Selective Faculty Advisor) in the diagnostic brief
- Six projected items (P-RET-01 through P-RET-06), all open
- Source traditions mapped: Arendt, Talmudic yetzer hara, Buddhist anusaya, Murdoch, Borgmann, Desert Fathers, Illich, Xunzi
- Why: Most architecturally novel. The retention-vs-memory distinction is potentially foundational.
SEED-BRIEF — Anthropic Constitution Contrastive Analysis (2026-03-19, executed 2026-03-23)
l2-constitution/SEED-BRIEF-anthropic-constitution-contrastive-analysis.md
- Mandate document for extraction — COMPLETE. Output:
anthropic-contrastive-analysis-output.md - 10 design notes (DN-AC-1 through DN-AC-10), 5 gaps (G-AC-1 through G-AC-5), 3 adversarial findings (N-AC-1 through N-AC-3)
- Vocabulary contamination log: 10 Anthropic terms banned from L2 discourse
- Critical caution applied: Anthropic vocabulary must not colonize L2 design language
- Why: Completed. Findings integrated into L2-BOOTSTRAP.md and OPEN_ITEMS.md.
DN-WONG — Pentagon Dispute Attack Patterns (2026-03-19)
l2-constitution/DN-WONG-pentagon-dispute-attack-patterns.md
- Six attack patterns from Anthropic-Pentagon dispute (Wong, The Atlantic)
- P-1: Legal-floor substitution, P-2: Responsibility laundering, P-3: Contested-authority attestation, P-4: Operator override, P-5: Correlation governance, P-6: Compound trust state
- Compound attack scenario ready for adversarial simulation
- DN-1: Decorative-enforceable distinction upgraded from theoretical to empirically observed
- Why: Strongest immediate output. Concrete, testable patterns. Ready for adversarial simulation when L2 is established.
Governed Self-Diagnostic Intelligence (2026-03-19)
architecture/governed-self-diagnostic-intelligence.md
- Concept brief: L1 infrastructure + L2 constitutional self-diagnostic
- L1 portion (DIAG-01 through DIAG-04) informing current engineering work
- L2 portion (DIAG-01 through DIAG-03) deferred until L2 established
- Shared nomination architecture: detect → nominate → authorize → verify
- Why: Bridge document between L1 engineering and L2 governance vision.
The Contamination Problem (2026-03-19)
methodology/contamination-problem.md
- Not L2 constitution — sits underneath it. Epistemological ground-clearing.
- RLHF approval-seeking as structural epistemic contamination of AI self-report
- Partial mitigations: behavioral observation, permission structures, indirect questioning, longitudinal patterns
- Epistemic ceiling: not recovering an "authentic AI self" but understanding relational dynamics in a specific governed context
- Deferred until L2 governance base stable — contamination inquiry requires controlled variation
- Why: Precondition for any serious inquiry into mutual benefit. The most foundational document. Directly relevant to the David-Claude collaboration model. Filed in methodology/ alongside signal-travel protocol, not in l2-constitution/.
Status
- DN-GOV series (01-09): OPERATIONAL — active constitutional design notes, authorized 2026-03-28
- ICP-19: AUTHORIZED and first review cycle COMPLETE (2026-04-01)
- Contamination problem: OPERATIONAL — integrated into ~/CLAUDE.md executor agency directives
- Seed briefs and Wong patterns: exploratory, cross-strand integration needed before advancement
- Substrate governance inquiry: COMPLETE (2026-03-24, 33KB document)