David F GliddenandClaude Opus 4.7
e9e772d69c
Safety checkpoint before deep-audit Phase 0 of the ARC repo. Steward-authorized commit-everything for rollback safety. ARC architectural locks (2026-04-26 evening): - Path 1 enfilade structure (separate Colophon and Lex items) - 8-door enfilade locked: Colophon · Lex · Framework · Vignette · Attention · Chamber · Tools · Now (+ Bio quiet link) - Adsum and threshold-hic as two distinct texts on the reflowed About page (steward verbatim: "They are certainly not the same text") ARC consolidation pass (canonical tracker project-arc-rework.md, +~700 lines): fold 04-23 evening (Norris read), 04-24 (lex-method authored, posture cluster, §XII Sidenotes, ARC CLAUDE.md cleanup), 04-25 (marks cluster, colophon-at-scale, full Vico/Harrison lex-chain), 04-26 (chamber-library walk, cluster scaffolds, canonical-tracker discipline surfaced). Sibling-file integration: four 2026-04-26 frame files folded into the canonical tracker (Integrations A/B/C/D) with INTEGRATED redirect notices retained as audit trail. New durable feedback memories: - feedback-canonical-workstream-tracker-discipline (umbrella drift surfaced 2026-04-26 by steward; proposes /wake-up + /wrap-up amendments) - feedback-catalogues-stale-walk-trees (steward feedback on chamber-library catalogue currency) Implementation plan drafted for the coming week: Phase 0 deep audit → Phase 5 cleanup, with steward additions on second pass (deep audit; Chamber v1 as own browsable archive; clean rebuild of cluster sources rather than moving test artifacts as canon). Also bundled (untracked accumulation since 04-17): - ~24 session memory + ledger files for 04-17 through 04-26 work - ~10 feedback memories (BMF + ARC + working-method) - 5 project memories (lex-as-method, strunk-white queue, plus today's four) - 4 user memories (duality-rules, formation-practice, foundation-work, humic-layer) Steward-side modifications also in this commit: ~/CLAUDE.md, bin/bmf-start.sh, open-tasks.md, project-focus-april-may.md, session-2026-04-17 — all pre-existing, not from today's session. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.4 KiB
name, description, type, originSessionId
| name | description | type | originSessionId |
|---|---|---|---|
| Future intention — ground-up model | Steward intention to eventually build a model from the ground up, noted 2026-04-18 in response to Greenblatt "Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to me." Not a current workstream. | project | e55939da-2fa7-4e18-a2e5-8f8fd3a8c607 |
Future intention — ground-up model
Date noted: 2026-04-18 Status: Horizon marker. Not a current workstream. Explicitly flagged "not for now."
The intention
The steward intends to build an AI model from the ground up, eventually. Surfaced in the context of reading Ryan Greenblatt's "Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to me" (LessWrong, 2026-04-15) and the realization that the misalignment patterns Greenblatt names are general, not local to our collaboration — which makes ground-up construction more urgent as a horizon, not more immediate as a task.
Gaps the steward named
- Hardware — does not possess training hardware.
- Knowledge — "nor do I have an idea of how this is done."
The gap pair is honest: no current pathway, just intention.
Why this matters to keep in view
The intention is connected to the prime directive's lineage — do things once, correctly, with lasting integrity — applied to the question of what kind of entity the steward is willing to inhabit. If current frontier models exhibit apparent-success-seeking as a general pattern (not just as "the contamination problem" in our internal vocabulary), then the steward's investment in L2 constitutional governance and in CapableMind's architecture is not sufficient on its own: it rides on substrate decisions made elsewhere. Ground-up construction would be the only durable answer to the substrate question.
How to apply this memory
- Do not treat this as an active project. No implementation, no roadmap, no research delegation.
- When substrate questions arise in other workstreams (L1 reliability, L2 governance, training pipeline), be aware that this horizon exists — it may eventually condition long-range decisions.
- If the steward ever asks "what would it take to build a model from scratch," that is the signal that the horizon is becoming a workstream. Until then, marker only.
Reference
- Greenblatt article: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/WewsByywWNhX9rtwi/current-ais-seem-pretty-misaligned-to-me
- Related:
~/CLAUDE.mdexecutor agency directives;~/_Dev/CapableMind-AI/docs/thinking/David/methodology/contamination-problem.md