54 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
54 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
name: session-ledger-2026-05-27
|
||
description: "Practice-of-return ledger maintained by /symmetria — returns, open horizons, recalibrations, authorization moves, sub-agent dialogues, bypasses."
|
||
metadata:
|
||
node_type: memory
|
||
type: feedback
|
||
originSessionId: 9b13b6ec-e1d8-473f-a502-b411a44c1c96
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Session Ledger — 2026-05-27
|
||
|
||
## Returns
|
||
- 2026-05-27T11:40 — Applied read-the-source discipline to a jurist-drafted brief before executing (steward asked me to correct stale specifics). Verified BOTH premises against actual code rather than executing on inference. Caught: (1) pain-point #1 (confidence discarded) is STALE — I-CF/I-CC shipped (`base.ts:59-111`, Amendment 61) + `sourceClassificationConfidence` persisted (`vector/storage.ts:35`); (2) pain-point #2 substrate claim imprecise — `config.ts` still configures SurrealDB(SurrealKV) yet no surrealdb client dep; substrate mid-transition, must trace not assert (`asserting-absence-from-non-presence-at-one-path` avoided). Hermes confirmed real via source (134k★, github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent), not relied on training memory (past Jan-2026 cutoff).
|
||
|
||
## Authorization moves
|
||
- 2026-05-27 — Steward authorized Hermes Agent scout mission (research/exploration, no constitutional consequence; deliver to jurist via PENDING). Jurist drafted the brief; steward delegated stale-fact correction to executor. Executing as reconnaissance, not build.
|
||
- 2026-05-27 — Steward authorized "EXPLAIN first, then clean up" for the live L1 runaway. Done: read-only EXPLAIN pinned N6 to temporal causal subsystem; killed PID 848; booted out legit job (restorable) + booted-out-and-DISABLED rogue com.capablemind.bmf (durable N5 fix). BMF fully parked, nothing lost.
|
||
- 2026-05-27 — Steward authorized "send anything useful to Seb" + approved literal draft ("post as is"). Posted N6 correction+pin to #170: https://github.com/CapableMind-ai/betterMemories_app/issues/170#issuecomment-4553635193 (corrects the 2026-05-25 "stopped the instance" claim; reassigns N6 from entity-suspect to causal subsystem). Per REVIEWED-21/23 draft-then-approve discipline — steward reviewed literal text before post.
|
||
|
||
## Open horizons
|
||
- 2026-05-27T10:09 — Woke into ARC Stage F thread (confirmed; ~13h pause). Compass closed+live; remaining Stage F items (generator / marginalia / vignette / audits / a11y) — steward to pick which leads. Open question carried from wrap: cross-device render confirmation of the SVG compass (non-Mac), still unborn.
|
||
- 2026-05-27T~19:15 — RE-WAKE (context-clear, not sleep; ~30 min after the CapableMind/tooling wrap) back to ARC Stage F. Thread CONFIRMED — ARC clean+untouched at `e1d0f12`. Same open horizons as the morning entry; CapableMind arc parked at a clean summit (L1 in Seb's court, Hermes scout + skill-harvest awaiting jurist). Skill-harvest proposals unauthorized: CREATE bmf-diagnose (recommended), l1-audit-revalidation, §2.d patch. Holding the read-the-actual-source + don't-over-defer disciplines for spec/generator work.
|
||
|
||
## Skill-harvest practice + landscape register (steward-authorized)
|
||
- 2026-05-27 — Refactored "skills improve from what we learn" into our way of working as the GOVERNED analog of Hermes's autonomous self-improvement (propose→steward-authorize→apply→record = [PROPOSAL]→[REVIEWED] on our own tooling; dogfoods the thesis; "no harvest" valid, inverts Hermes's "nothing shouldn't be default"). /wrap-up §1.6 + §8 field + constraint; /wake-up §2.a + §3 glance; provenance comments on both. PENDING-23. Also built /landscape-scan skill + living landscape-register.md (two-tier lens; pushed to capableMind_docs origin so Seb sees the N6 correction). Eventual /tooling-scan sibling noted.
|
||
- 2026-05-27 RETURN — asserted wake/wrap/symmetria were DUPLICATED across .claude + dotfiles (context-rot risk) from a misread `ls -la` that followed the symlink; `-L`/`diff` check disproved it — they're already symlinks, edits landed in canonical dotfiles. Corrected the false claim in PENDING-23 in-record. Drift: `asserting-fs-state-from-a-misread-listing` (kin to acting-on-inferred-not-read). The verify-before-leaving-a-claim discipline held.
|
||
|
||
## Hermes scout — DELIVERED
|
||
- 2026-05-27 — Mission complete. Deliverable `docs/thinking/David/l1-reliability/hermes-agent-scout-2026-05-27.md` (uncommitted) + PENDING-22 filed for jurist review. 3 recon sub-agents (memory/ingestion, skill, sub-agent/ACP) all returned code-grounded findings; synthesis + crosswalk + candidate-adaptations(speculative) + open-questions are executor's. Two stale-fact corrections to the brief landed (pain#1 SHIPPED via Amendment 61; pain#2 substrate is a hybrid mid-retirement). Headlines: CapableMind AHEAD on epistemic integrity; Hermes SKILL.md system = the real lesson for pain#4 (procedural-memory gap); governance flag = Hermes's autonomous skill/memory writes violate loop-is-load-bearing — any borrow must restore the authorization boundary. Clone at /tmp/hermes-agent-scout (throwaway). Deliverable + doc NOT committed (commit only when asked).
|
||
|
||
## N6 diagnosis (corrected — for Seb hand-off)
|
||
- 2026-05-27 — EXPLAIN+sample pin OVERTURNS audit-delta's prime suspect. Entity fuzzy-match (`entity/storage.ts:262`, the suspect) EXONERATED: 1,717 rows, all 3 queries `SEARCH ... idx_entity_status_facet`. Reconciliation (`reconciliation.ts:32`, afterReplay) EXONERATED: indexed + 0 dirty rows. REAL N6 = temporal CAUSAL subsystem: graph exploded to 245,535 `caused` edges + 238,492 `causal_chain` (~42 edges/event from 5,752 events); 238,505 chains coherence-UNevaluated. Hot queries are full SCANs (`SELECT * FROM caused`, `SELECT * FROM causal_chain WHERE 1=1` — `storage-sqlite.ts:421/843/883`; EXPLAIN = SCAN, no index). Sample stack = synchronous better-sqlite3 `.all()` btree scan reading pages off disk on main thread → 26h CPU peg. NOT-yet-pinned: which exact full-scan caller runs in the hot per-event/loop path (Seb's trace, or one more focused pass). Sample at /tmp/bmf_sample_848_2026-05-27.txt.
|
||
|
||
## Confidence to recalibrate
|
||
- Hold the read-the-actual-source family today (drift patterns: `acting-on-inferred-not-read`, `asserted-font-license-from-memory-not-reading-the-file`). Counter-discipline that held last session: render-and-look, measure the real thing. Relevant if Stage F touches specs or generated output.
|
||
|
||
## Authorization moves
|
||
|
||
## Open horizons (added evening)
|
||
- 2026-05-27T~20:15 — Steward queued a CLOSE-FUTURE L1-FIX SESSION off the Hindsight deep-read (PENDING-24). Agreed shape: (1) live-state GATE FIRST — `git pull` Seb's `bd70ceb`+`e8c5fb7` (D1–D10, NOT on the `3bc8b75` disk I read) + re-verify the 4 findings still hold before building (may already touch N6/recall — don't build on stale tree); (2) measure-before-cut — build **D1 benchmark harness** first (ours; adapter + LongMemEval/LoCoMo, no L1-core/logchain/PR-to-main) → the empirical scoreboard L1 has never had; (3) then draft **A1** (means_of_knowing/earned_confidence→recall = "Amendment 61 for the qualitative axis"; output-provenance half is cheap+low-risk) for jurist+Seb; (4) B1(N6 governor)/C1(local rerank)/C2(dead probe) as Seb-PR items, B1 reconciled w/ D1–D10. Governance: we design+draft+PR, Seb implements+lands (territory-respect); D1 is the one we can largely execute ourselves. This is the L1 resumption point.
|
||
|
||
## Symmetria checks
|
||
- 2026-05-27T~19:30 — CHECK on the deep-analysis plan (full source-grounded read of L1 spec+current-state + Hindsight paper+code → one durable artifact, epistemic-typing lens). Steward authorized "take all the time you need, do it once, won't redo." Fittingness YES (named worth ARC's wait; strategic fork). Craft risk = composing-from-summary instead of reading source (my active drift) → mitigation: real file reads + I verify every load-bearing claim. Ethics = RELATIONAL FRAME load-bearing: L1 is Seb's mechanism / David's conception+governance; deliverable stance = "insight to make OUR system work" (borrow understanding+technique NOT code/substrate); BMF-on-Hindsight-substrate explicitly SET ASIDE on-record, not pushed (steward: Seb wouldn't be open; sovereignty). Epistemic-typing is the crown jewel = framing improvement in David's half. Recommendation: PROCEED. Confidence 0.85; uncertainty = L1 spec file layout + whether Hindsight tuning legible in one pass (flag if 2nd pass needed, don't fake completeness).
|
||
|
||
## Sub-agent dialogues
|
||
- 2026-05-27T12:00 — Dispatched 3 Hermes-recon agents. The harness injected the steward's mid-flight L1 message ("read L1 files, still having problems") INTO the running agents → derailed A1 (memory/ingestion, no Hermes deliverable; flagged scope-confusion honestly — good integrity) and A2 (skill system, fully pivoted to L1). A3 (sub-agent/ACP) completed cleanly (ACP = external Agent Client Protocol, editor↔agent JSON-RPC; delegate_task tool, ephemeral skip_memory children, ThreadPoolExecutor max 3, depth cap). Audit (§5): A3 calibration honest ([SPECULATIVE] marked) → use. A2 produced HIGH-value responsive L1 findings (live runaway PID 848) w/ honest confidence split (runtime=verified, N6-mapping=inferred); did NOT stop where convenient → act AFTER my own verification (done, confirmed). A1 → re-query. Re-dispatched A1+A2 (memory, skill) to background w/ hard-scope guard.
|
||
- 2026-05-27T12:00 — LIVE L1 finding VERIFIED by own read (not relayed on trust): com.capablemind.bmf=PID848 99.5%CPU 1d02h (KeepAlive=true), com.capablemind.bettermemories crash-looping on data-dir lock, shared bmf.stderr.log=70M. N5+N6 compounding, live+unattended. "BMF offline by design" was a false convenient resting-state (contamination-flag: trusted "we turned it off" w/o launchctl check). Captured read-only sample of 848 for the N6 pin before any cleanup. Operational decision teed to steward; EXPLAIN-against-live-data-dir held for steward auth (territory respect).
|
||
|
||
## Sub-agent dialogues (deep-analysis, evening)
|
||
- 2026-05-27T~19:35 — Dispatched 3 read agents (L1 spec / L1 runtime / Hindsight code) under Symmetria §5 preamble. All three returned dense, well-cited, source-grounded. §5 audit: CALIBRATION honest (each marked verified-vs-inferred + could-not-confirm); CONVENIENCE — none stopped early, all surfaced inconvenient findings (Hindsight code≠paper; "Amendment 61 overstated for the epistemic layer"); SCOPE — surfaced beyond-ask (Agent A challenged the binary framing; Agent B flagged the dead similarity probe as a [HARDENING]). Verdict: ACT after my own verification of the 3 load-bearing claims.
|
||
- 2026-05-27T~19:45 — VERIFIED against source (counter to assert-from-inference drift): (1) Hindsight opinion+confidence_score+CARA REMOVED — migration `g2h3i4j5k6l7_remove_opinion_fact_type.py` verbatim (DROP COLUMN confidence_score; CHECK→world/experience/observation); per-unit link caps real+tested; no reinforce/cara in engine. Shipped ≠ paper. (2) L1 `setSimilarityProbe` zero callers → observation-recall coupling DEAD in checkout `3bc8b75`. (3) L1 `earned_confidence`+`means_of_knowing` written in classification, read by NOTHING in query-router/synthesizer → orphaned at recall (the numeric confidence scalar IS threaded live; the qualitative epistemic kind is not). All three hold.
|
||
|
||
## Bypasses
|