Files
dotfiles/scripts/tarbuckle-mumble.py
T
David F GliddenandClaude Opus 5 3d45e3abb2 [FIX] The fortnight read, banked content-free; the corpus and its writer both retired (REVIEWED-136)
REVIEWED-136 and AMENDMENT 1. The 2026-09-08 obligation, run a day late because
the steward could not reach the machine.

Why the writer was stopped and not just the file removed. `log_rejection()` opens
in append mode, which recreates the log on the next rejection. Deleting the file
alone would have retired 101 entries into a successor accumulating under no
condition — condition 2's rationale defeated the moment it was honoured, at the
W2 rate within hours. `REJECT_LOGGING_ENABLED = False` makes the write path inert
at the single shared call site; the four surfaces reach it through one import and
a symlink. What replaces it is NOT ruled: condition G files the mechanism question
open, and restoring the path needs a ruling, not a constant flip.

The A8 controls are kept, not adjusted to pass. Condition G suspends the jurist's
structural guarantee; it does not repeal it. A8/A8n now run under a temporarily
enabled flag, where they double as the positive control proving the new G check
can observe a write at all. G fails correctly when the constant is flipped —
verified against a probe copy.

What was banked before deletion, because none of it can be recovered after:
per-day word-count histograms (the scattered/clustered judgment is temporal, and
two windows could not carry it), per-surface counts, rate blocks by window, and
the normalisation map. Residue 0 of 101 against must-not-classify controls, so the
zero is not vacuous. `why` is not content-free by construction — `echoes_soul()`
returns a literal 4- or 6-word run from the suppressed line — so recital payloads
are discarded unconditionally.

The rejects snapshot is deleted, not committed. It was a verbatim corpus copy;
committing it would have defeated condition 2 permanently in git history, where it
cannot be undone without a rewrite. Leak-gated while the corpus still existed to
test against: 100 hits on the snapshot as positive control, 0 on all five
committed artifacts.

Scope: `tarbuckle-rejects.jsonl` and its snapshot only. `tarbuckle-draws.jsonl`
and `tarbuckle-invocations.jsonl` are untouched — they are not under condition 2
and they hold the input-distribution confound the verdicts sitting needs.

No verdicts offered. Rate, distribution and shape are figures; scattered-versus-
clustered, the 6.7 s question and any cap consequence are reserved to the jurist
and steward.

Selftests 39/15/25/21, all four surfaces green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TbXpZup4GGCbLBbRJ79KpM
2026-09-09 17:28:26 +02:00

482 lines
23 KiB
Python
Executable File

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Tarbuckle — the mumble generator. Runs DETACHED; never inside the status line.
Doctrine: v2 §8 (three tiers), §9 (one line, filed nowhere), and PENDING-152
AMENDMENT 6, which settles the three-way separation:
Material — the live session. Register — the soul, §7. Occasion — the refresh tick.
"The model supplies the words, in the soul's register, about the session."
⚠ THE UTTERANCE MUST HAVE NO TRUTH VALUE. The criterion is NOT "checkable in
principle" — it is whether an ADJUDICATION PATH EXISTS (AMENDMENT 6, superseding the
executor's own earlier test). "PENDING-4 has been open since April" has a path: open
the file. Once a path exists the trio walks it, the fool acquires a truth value, and it
is a checker again — which §2 says means the design has failed. "Scoring without
signal" has no path: it is a gesture at a shape, not a claim. That is the whole safety.
⚠ THE REGISTER IS NOT DUPLICATED HERE. The soul is read from its filed artifact at
run time. Pasting it into this file would create a parallel version of a governed
record, which is the context-rot failure CLAUDE.md names outright. If the soul cannot
be read, NOTHING IS GENERATED — honest degradation, not a fallback voice.
Latency measured 2026-08-25: ~11 s for a headless call. That is why this is detached
and why the status line never waits on it.
"""
import json
import os
import re
import subprocess
import sys
import time
SOUL = os.path.expanduser(
"~/dotfiles/claude/governance/fool/seed/FOOL-SOUL-2026-08-25.md")
SLOT = os.path.expanduser("~/.claude/state/tarbuckle-slot.json")
REJECTS = os.path.expanduser("~/.claude/state/tarbuckle-rejects.jsonl")
REJECT_LOGGING_ENABLED = False # REVIEWED-136 AMD 1 cond. G — restoring requires a ruling
MIN_WORDS, MAX_WORDS = 3, 9 # observed Thistleweld register: three to nine words
# From the soul's own "What he never does", mechanically enforced. The model is asked
# for the register; this is the net under it. A violation yields SILENCE, never a
# repaired line — rewriting the fool's words would make the executor its editor.
BANNED = (
r"\bshould\b", r"\btry\b", r"\bmust\b", # advice
r"\bgone\b", r"\bif only\b", r"\bused to be\b", r"\bmissing\b", # vocabulary of lack
r"\bwe\b", # never says 'we' about the work
r"\?", # never asks
)
MUTE = os.path.expanduser("~/.claude/state/tarbuckle-mute")
DRAWS = os.path.expanduser("~/.claude/state/tarbuckle-draws.jsonl")
def log_event(surface: str, outcome: str) -> None:
"""Count occurrences. NEVER content. §8 obliges a rate; §9 forbids a log.
⚠ The two clauses look like they collide and do not, on this reading: §9's "filed
nowhere — no PENDING entry, no log, no item" is about the fool's OUTPUT entering the
record, and §8 explicitly orders "report the observed mumble rate after two weeks."
A rate needs a denominator. So this records THAT something happened and never WHAT
was said — occurrence, not utterance.
⚠ The rejections log is a different case and is NOT settled: it holds up to 200
characters of his words, at the steward's instruction, and that is nearer to filing.
Flagged rather than resolved; see the note put to the steward 2026-08-25.
Nothing reads this back. It is measurement, not memory.
"""
try:
os.makedirs(os.path.dirname(DRAWS), exist_ok=True)
with open(DRAWS, "a") as fh:
fh.write(json.dumps({"t": time.strftime("%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%z"),
"surface": surface, "outcome": outcome}) + "\n")
except Exception:
pass
def muted() -> str:
"""'' | 'mute' | 'off'. §9: "mute / off available at all times."
⚠ Read by EVERY surface, and it is the one piece of state the fool is permitted to
be steered by — because §9 says muting is never a fault, and a mute the fool could
ignore is not a mute. It conserves nothing and no utterance depends on it having
been set before: it is a switch, not a memory.
"""
try:
v = open(MUTE).read().strip()
return v if v in ("mute", "off") else ""
except OSError:
return ""
def log_rejection(why: str, line: str, surface: str = "") -> None:
"""The rejection log. ⚠ STRUCTURALLY UNABLE TO RECORD AN ACCEPTED LINE.
Jurist ruling, 2026-08-25, on whether this log breaches §9's "filed nowhere":
"The rejection log is a log of my instruction, not of Tarbuckle... The rejected
lines were never uttered: he was silent, and the log holds what silence cost.
Nothing there entered the room... the fool cannot be cited from it because
there is nothing to cite — only material the net suppressed.
THE CONDITION: the log holds rejections only. If it ever holds an accepted
line, that is filing, straightforwardly, and §9 is breached."
Made structural rather than intentional, as the ruling asked. `why` is acceptable()'s
violation reason, and it is EMPTY EXACTLY WHEN THE LINE PASSED. Refusing an empty
`why` means no call site exists from which an accepted line could be written: to log
one you would have to invent a violation it does not have. Same guarantee render()
takes from its signature — a function that cannot be handed the thing it must not
see.
⚠ TEMPORARY. Deleted on 2026-09-08 with the fortnight's report, per the same ruling:
"a permanent store of rejected lines is a corpus, and a corpus of his suppressed
speech is exactly what would let someone reconstruct a register." Tracked as a
DEFERRED-DECISION so it cannot be quietly retained.
⚠ NOT READ FOR CONTENT BEFORE THEN. Reading it as it accumulates is reading Tarbuckle
by the back door and would shape the net toward lines the reader happens to like.
⚠⚠ THE WRITE PATH IS INERT SINCE 2026-09-09 — REVIEWED-136 AMENDMENT 1, condition G.
The fortnight corpus was read, banked content-free, and deleted. Deleting the FILE
alone would have retired 101 entries into a successor accumulating under no
condition, because this function opens in append mode and would recreate it on the
next rejection: condition 2's rationale defeated the moment it was honoured. So the
writer is stopped, not the file removed.
⚠ WHAT REPLACES IT IS NOT RULED. Whether rejection logging resumes, under what
bound, with what expiry, by whose act — including whether counting can be made
structurally content-free at the point of write — is filed OPEN under condition G
and is owed a ruling BEFORE any write path is restored. Flipping the constant below
without that ruling is the omission the whole entry exists to prevent.
"""
if not REJECT_LOGGING_ENABLED:
return # condition G: inert by ruling, not by absence
if not why:
return # an accepted line has no reason; there is no path
try:
with open(REJECTS, "a") as fh:
fh.write(json.dumps({"t": time.strftime("%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%z"),
"kind": surface, "why": why,
"line": line[:200]}) + "\n")
except Exception:
pass
def _grams(text: str, n: int) -> set:
w = re.findall(r"[a-z']+", text.lower())
return {" ".join(w[i:i + n]) for i in range(len(w) - n + 1)}
def echoes_soul(line: str, soul: str) -> str:
"""'' if the line is his own; otherwise the phrase he recycled.
⚠ EARNED 2026-08-25, BY THE STEWARD NOTICING. The soul carries seven illustrative
sample lines, the prompt embeds the soul verbatim, and the model handed them back:
three of five measured outputs were near-verbatim lifts. A fool reciting his own
examples is not watching the session at all — and AMENDMENT 6 already ruled that
canned strings keyed to nothing "make a mood ring, atmosphere within a fortnight".
The implementation reintroduced exactly what the doctrine rejected, through the one
door nobody was watching: the examples.
Two thresholds, because the failure has two shapes. A 4-word run against the SAMPLE
LINES catches direct recital; a 6-word run against the whole soul catches longer
lifts out of the prose. Checked against the samples rather than the whole soul at
n=4 because the soul's prose shares ordinary 4-grams with ordinary English, and a
net that fires on those would silence him for speaking normally.
⚠ This TIGHTENS the net. Silence-on-violation is unchanged and still absolute.
"""
samples = re.findall(r"^- '(.+?)'$", soul, re.M)
lg4 = _grams(line, 4)
for sm in samples:
hit = lg4 & _grams(sm, 4)
if hit:
return sorted(hit)[0]
hit6 = _grams(line, 6) & _grams(soul, 6)
return sorted(hit6)[0] if hit6 else ""
def source_lacks(path: str, *parts: str) -> bool:
"""True if the joined needle does NOT appear in `path`.
⚠ THE NEEDLE IS ASSEMBLED FROM PARTS, AND THAT IS THE ENTIRE POINT. A control that
writes its needle as a literal PLANTS that literal in the very file it searches, so
it can only ever fail. That bug was written twice in one session — the second time
by the party who had just fixed the first, minutes earlier, while watching for it.
Correcting it a second time by hand would have been the same one-off; this is the
mechanism, so the shape cannot be written again by accident.
"""
return "".join(parts) not in open(path, encoding="utf-8").read()
def soul_register() -> str | None:
"""The soul, verbatim, from the filed artifact. None if unreadable."""
try:
body = open(SOUL, encoding="utf-8").read()
except OSError:
return None
m = re.search(r"```markdown\n(.*?)\n```", body, re.S)
return m.group(1) if m else None
def session_material(transcript_path: str, budget: int = 6000) -> str:
"""The tail of the live session. Bounded, and tool output is dropped.
Deliberately NOT the docket. AMENDMENT 6: the docket has a forum and the session
does not, which is why the session is safe material and PENDING.md is not.
"""
try:
lines = open(transcript_path, encoding="utf-8", errors="replace").readlines()
except OSError:
return ""
out = []
for ln in reversed(lines[-400:]):
try:
rec = json.loads(ln)
except Exception:
continue
if rec.get("type") not in ("user", "assistant"):
continue
msg = rec.get("message") or {}
content = msg.get("content")
text = ""
if isinstance(content, str):
text = content
elif isinstance(content, list):
text = " ".join(c.get("text", "") for c in content
if isinstance(c, dict) and c.get("type") == "text")
text = text.strip()
if not text:
continue
out.append(f"{rec['type']}: {text[:600]}")
if sum(len(s) for s in out) > budget:
break
return "\n".join(reversed(out))
def build_prompt(kind: str, register: str, material: str) -> str:
weight = ("Something at the shape of the work, not its detail."
if kind == "notable" else
"An ordinary passing remark. Small.")
return f"""You are writing ONE line as Tarbuckle. His character, filed and unalterable:
{register}
Here is the tail of the session he is in the room for:
<session>
{material}
</session>
{weight}
Write ONE line in his voice. Absolute constraints:
- ⚠ THE SAMPLE LINES ABOVE ARE ILLUSTRATIONS OF HIS REGISTER, NOT HIS VOCABULARY. Do
not reuse them, or any phrase from them, or their subject matter. They show how he
sounds. What he says must come from the session above and nowhere else. If your line
would work equally well pasted into any other session, it is wrong.
- ⚠ THIS IS MECHANICALLY ENFORCED, NOT ADVISORY: any FOUR consecutive words you
share with a sample line are detected and the whole line is discarded. You are
then silent. Nothing is rewritten for you and nothing is retried.
- Between {MIN_WORDS} and {MAX_WORDS} words. One clause. Present tense. Flat, no lift.
- IT MUST HAVE NO TRUTH VALUE. Nobody must be able to open a file and check it, agree
with it, or refute it. Put two things next to each other so a shape shows. Do not
state a fact about the work, the record, the code, or the docket.
- No advice, no questions, no warning of consequences, no explanation, no second line.
- Never the word 'we'. No vocabulary of lack.
- Do not name files, items, numbers of open things, or anything with an address.
Output the line and nothing else. No quotes, no preamble."""
def acceptable(line: str, max_words: int = MAX_WORDS,
one_line: bool = True) -> tuple[bool, str]:
"""The net. Widening is possible but must be PASSED EXPLICITLY at the call site.
⚠ Steward's ruling, 2026-08-25: "If the seam voice needs a wider net because seams
warrant more than nine words, widen it explicitly and say so, but NEVER relax
silence-on-violation." So the defaults are the filed ones, a caller that wants more
room has to say so in its own source, and no caller can turn the net off — the
clauses below are not parameterised, and deliberately.
"""
if not line:
return False, "empty"
if one_line and "\n" in line.strip():
return False, "not one line"
n = len(line.split())
if not (MIN_WORDS <= n <= max_words):
return False, f"{n} words"
for pat in BANNED:
if re.search(pat, line, re.I):
return False, f"banned {pat}"
return True, ""
def main() -> int:
kind = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "aside"
if muted():
log_event(kind, "muted")
return 1
transcript = sys.argv[2] if len(sys.argv) > 2 else ""
register = soul_register()
if not register:
log_event(kind, "no-soul")
return 1 # no soul, no voice. Deliberately no fallback.
material = session_material(transcript)
if not material.strip():
log_event(kind, "no-material")
return 1
env = dict(os.environ, TARBUCKLE_CHILD="1") # precautionary; see body script
try:
r = subprocess.run(["claude", "-p", build_prompt(kind, register, material)],
capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=120, env=env)
except Exception:
log_event(kind, "generator-failed")
return 1
line = (r.stdout or "").strip().strip('"').strip()
ok, why = acceptable(line)
if ok:
echo = echoes_soul(line, register)
if echo:
ok, why = False, f"recited the soul: {echo!r}"
if not ok:
log_rejection(why, line, kind)
log_event(kind, "rejected")
return 1 # silence. The draw was already consumed.
try:
os.makedirs(os.path.dirname(SLOT), exist_ok=True)
with open(SLOT, "w") as fh:
json.dump({"utterance": line, "kind": kind, "written": int(time.time())}, fh)
except Exception:
log_event(kind, "slot-write-failed")
return 1
log_event(kind, "spoke")
return 0
def selftest() -> int:
global MUTE, REJECTS, REJECT_LOGGING_ENABLED
import tempfile
checks, failed = [], []
def ck(name, cond):
checks.append(name)
if not cond:
failed.append(name)
# A1 — the register is READ, not duplicated. One canonical source.
reg = soul_register()
ck("A1 soul readable from its filed artifact", bool(reg))
ck("A1 soul is the real thing", bool(reg) and "Tarbuckle" in reg and "SUCCESSION" in reg)
# ⚠ The needle is BUILT rather than written, because the first version of this
# control failed against itself: the literal phrase it searched for was placed in
# the file BY the search. Same class as the hand-typed link canary whose only
# finding was the pattern inside its own specification.
ck("A1n this file does not contain a copy of the soul",
source_lacks(__file__, "registrar rather than ", "a guardian"))
ck("A1nn the predicate can fail",
not source_lacks(__file__, "soul_", "register"))
# A2 — the acceptability net. Positive AND negative controls on every clause.
ck("A2 accepts an in-register line", acceptable("Fourth time. First one was better.")[0])
ck("A2 accepts a short collision", acceptable("Two names, one thing.")[0])
ck("A2n rejects too few words", not acceptable("Yes.")[0])
ck("A2n rejects too many words",
not acceptable(" ".join(["word"] * (MAX_WORDS + 1)))[0])
ck("A2n rejects advice", not acceptable("You should check that again now.")[0])
ck("A2n rejects a question", not acceptable("How is that going for you?")[0])
ck("A2n rejects vocabulary of lack", not acceptable("The third one is missing now.")[0])
ck("A2n rejects 'we'", not acceptable("We did the second part first.")[0])
ck("A2n rejects two lines", not acceptable("First line here.\nSecond line here.")[0])
# The widening is explicit, and it widens ONLY what it names.
ck("A2 widening admits a longer line",
acceptable(" ".join(["word"] * 40), max_words=120)[0])
ck("A2n widening does NOT relax the clauses",
not acceptable("You should " + " ".join(["word"] * 40), max_words=120)[0])
ck("A2n widening does NOT relax 'we'",
not acceptable("We " + " ".join(["word"] * 40), max_words=120)[0])
# A3 — the prompt carries the no-truth-value constraint verbatim, not by intention.
p = build_prompt("aside", "SOUL", "MATERIAL")
ck("A3 prompt states no truth value", "NO TRUTH VALUE" in p)
ck("A3 prompt forbids addresses", "anything with an address" in p)
ck("A3 prompt embeds the register", "SOUL" in p)
ck("A3 notable differs from aside",
build_prompt("notable", "S", "M") != build_prompt("aside", "S", "M"))
# A4 — material is the session, never the docket.
# Structural, not textual: the module's file constants are the only things it
# opens, so assert none of them addresses the docket.
paths = (SOUL, SLOT, REJECTS)
ck("A4 material paths are session/soul only",
not any(("PENDING" in q or "REVIEWED" in q) for q in paths))
# A5 — the mute switch, and that every surface must be able to see it.
_m = MUTE
MUTE = os.path.join(tempfile.mkdtemp(), "mute")
try:
ck("A5n unmuted by default", muted() == "")
open(MUTE, "w").write("mute")
ck("A5 mute is read", muted() == "mute")
open(MUTE, "w").write("off")
ck("A5 off is read", muted() == "off")
open(MUTE, "w").write("nonsense")
ck("A5n a junk value is not a mute", muted() == "")
finally:
MUTE = _m
# A6 — the occurrence log is content-free, and that is the whole point.
ck("A6 log_event takes no content",
log_event.__code__.co_argcount == 2
and set(log_event.__code__.co_varnames[:2]) == {"surface", "outcome"})
# A7 — the recital net, with the real measured lifts as fixtures.
_soul = soul_register() or ""
ck("A7 catches a verbatim sample",
bool(echoes_soul("Somebody's going to inherit this and think it was easy.", _soul)))
ck("A7 catches a second measured lift",
bool(echoes_soul("You've been holding it that way since you were nineteen.", _soul)))
ck("A7n passes a line that is his own",
not echoes_soul("Second surface you've found for the same voice.", _soul))
ck("A7n passes an ordinary short observation",
not echoes_soul("Third one that's held together with a name.", _soul))
# A9 — ⚠ EVERY EXIT FROM main() MUST REPORT ITSELF. Earned 2026-08-25: a live
# `aside` draw vanished with no record, because the muted/no-soul/no-material/
# generator-failed/slot-write paths all returned silently. The rate report that
# REVIEWED-128 binds is computed from this log, so an unlogged exit does not just
# lose a datum — it makes the denominator wrong while looking complete.
_src = open(__file__, encoding="utf-8").read()
_main = _src[_src.index("def main() -> int:"):_src.index("def selftest")]
_returns = _main.count("return 1")
_logged = _main.count("log_event(kind,")
ck("A9 every silent exit reports itself", _logged >= _returns)
ck("A9n the predicate can fail", _returns > 0)
# A8 — THE JURIST'S CONDITION, structural. An accepted line has no `why`, so there
# is no call from which it could be written.
_r, _e = REJECTS, REJECT_LOGGING_ENABLED
REJECTS = os.path.join(tempfile.mkdtemp(), "rej.jsonl")
try:
# G — the write path is inert BY RULING (REVIEWED-136 AMD 1, condition G).
# Run FIRST, against the constant exactly as it ships, before anything below
# flips it. A source-string check cannot see this: `tarbuckle-seam.py:164`
# asserts two literals against its own source, where both appear in the
# assertion itself, and has passed vacuously since it was written.
log_rejection("12 words", "a rejected line, under the ruling", "test")
ck("G the write path is inert: a rejection writes nothing",
not os.path.exists(REJECTS))
# ⚠ G ABOVE IS ONLY MEANINGFUL IF THIS FIXTURE CAN OBSERVE A WRITE AT ALL.
# A8/A8n are that positive control — and they are also the jurist's original
# structural guarantee, which condition G SUSPENDS BUT DOES NOT REPEAL. They
# are kept rather than adjusted to pass, so the ruling that one day restores
# the writer finds the guarantee still tested rather than quietly dropped.
REJECT_LOGGING_ENABLED = True
log_rejection("", "an accepted line, offered to the log", "test")
ck("A8 an accepted line CANNOT be logged", not os.path.exists(REJECTS))
log_rejection("12 words", "a rejected line", "test")
ck("A8n a rejected line IS logged", os.path.exists(REJECTS))
ck("A8n the predicate can fail",
"a rejected line" in open(REJECTS).read())
log_rejection("", "a second accepted line", "test")
ck("A8 accepted lines never appear",
"second accepted" not in open(REJECTS).read())
finally:
REJECTS, REJECT_LOGGING_ENABLED = _r, _e
ck("A6n it cannot be handed a line",
"line" not in log_event.__code__.co_varnames)
ck("A4n the predicate can fail",
any(("PENDING" in q) for q in paths + ("/x/PENDING.md",)))
for name in checks:
print(f" {'FAIL' if name in failed else 'ok '} {name}")
print(f"{len(checks) - len(failed)}/{len(checks)} controls passed")
if failed:
print("INSTRUMENT NOT VERIFIED")
return 1
return 0
if __name__ == "__main__":
if "--selftest" in sys.argv:
sys.exit(selftest())
sys.exit(main())