47 lines
9.2 KiB
Markdown
47 lines
9.2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
name: session-2026-07-24-afternoon-levi-scale-application-pilot-ratified-reviewed-71-flag-1-now-gates-the-wave
|
||
description: "Ran the born-digital lane against the RULED scale_application condition (REVIEWED-70 Q2) — first on work 13 (footnote-injection de-risk, no mutilation sites), then redone on the mutilation works 2/7/10 per steward direction, plus inter-work-interior + body-conservation. Jurist CONFIRMED the condition met (REVIEWED-71, legacy-witness-only grant) and caught a real §6 reasoning error I own: a 0-delete comparison against a SILENTLY-MUTILATED legacy witness cannot establish source-fidelity — so source-fidelity is UNDISCHARGED and Flag-1 (pin V-TEXT reference params) is now LOAD-BEARING. PULLING THREAD next session: close Flag-1 → clean source-fidelity verdict → unblock the 47-file V-TEXT wave. Warde graduation staged (V-SCAN, not blocked, ~90% — 2 OCR sites owe scan-adjudication)."
|
||
metadata:
|
||
node_type: memory
|
||
type: project
|
||
originSessionId: 3d93ae4a-11b7-49ca-8de0-63fa296e9394
|
||
modified: 2026-07-24T11:07:20.128Z
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Session 2026-07-24 (afternoon) — the Levi scale-application pilot, ratified; Flag-1 now the gate
|
||
|
||
Woke into a brief pause (born-digital lane run was the set thread) and carried it all the way to a jurist-confirmed `scale_application` ratification — through three steward corrections and one jurist-caught reasoning error, each of which sharpened the result.
|
||
|
||
## PAST — what happened + why
|
||
|
||
**The born-digital lane RUN against the 14 verified brackets — the pilot the brackets gated.**
|
||
- **Footnote injection HOLDS at 14-work complexity.** Whole-EPUB `convert_lane_borndigital.py` (glyph precondition met, 9 substitutions) passed the driver's global teeth: 816 pairs → **331 injected all-non-empty**, 0 mismatch/dup/intable. 32s.
|
||
- **First cut: work 13 (The Drowned and the Saved)** — the wrap's set target. Answered the footnote-density + mechanical-tractability question (551→95 spans after a demonstrated escape-fold extension; 3 mechanical patterns; 0 loss). **BUT work 13 has ZERO mutilation sites** → it did not exercise the RULED condition's core (converter-better source-adjudication).
|
||
- **Redone on the mutilation works 2/7/10 (steward-directed "redo in one of the applicable works").** Aggregate 148,262 witness words, **98.45% matched, 0 regression**. **converter-better: 8 sites, ALL source-adjudicated** (w2 Wstawać ć×3 + Braşov ş×1; w7 Oświęcim ś+ę; w10 Wstawać ć×3 — read source EPUB `<img>` at each, cross-checked the viewed glyph-map; Braşov = ş-cedilla, source-faithful, NOT "corrected" to ș). converter-worse 0; curation-to-carry un-exercised-with-reason. **inter-work-interior DEMONSTRATED** (positive test via `classify()`: inter-work drop→INTERIOR→FLAG; baseline PASS + leading-trim REVIEW as controls). **body-conservation leg** reproduces Eichmann Flag-1 (raw candidate FLAGs on MARKUP not prose).
|
||
- **Deliverables:** `docs/scale-application-levi-pilot-REPORT-2026-07-24.md` (self-contained, grounded — the jurist deliverable) + working artifacts in `_curation/levi-second-pilot-2026-07-23/` (witness_compare_levi.py, wc-levi-work{2,7,10,13}*.json, converter-better + inter-work-interior evidence).
|
||
|
||
**The jurist confirmation (REVIEWED-71) — condition MET on all 4 legs; grant legacy-witness-only.** Ruling filed verbatim `docs/scale-application-levi-pilot-JURIST-RULING-2026-07-24.md`; report Addendum applied. The jurist caught **a real §6 reasoning error** (owned): "no-prose-loss independently established by the 0-delete witness comparisons" is FALSE — the witness is the *curation-preservation* leg against a *legacy* witness (proves only no-regression-vs-prior-conversion, REVIEWED-70 Q1); against a witness silently mutilated in 8 places, 0-delete means only "lost nothing the MUTILATED conversion had" — CANNOT establish source-fidelity. I substituted the weaker, known-damaged anchor for the stronger obligation. **⇒ source-fidelity UNDISCHARGED; Flag-1 (pin V-TEXT reference params) is now LOAD-BEARING — no V-TEXT graduation runs before it closes.** Also: record converter-worse UN-EXERCISED (not passed); the 485 "mostly CONTENTS" = inference-not-census; move the fold extension to declared data. Braşov + negative-control affirmed specifically.
|
||
|
||
**Warde graduation staged (the "while we wait" task).** Retrieved OCR from M4; cleaned via the governed `normalize_ocr.py` (check-for-tooling-first — the olmOCR path, precedent Mumford/Alexander): VERBATIM GUARD PASS, 222 page-markers dropped, 11 headings recovered. verify_conversion PASS. Placement `canonical_texts/collections/typography/`, distinct slug from short-text `warde-crystal-goblet`. Tier V-SCAN (body-conservation ABSTAINS → not blocked by Flag-1). Candidate at `scratchpad/warde/the-crystal-goblet-sixteen-essays.md`. **3 review sites:** `twerppography` = deliberate Warde coinage (KEEP); `popularlarity`/`himselv` (Bible-typography essay) = possible OCR misreads → owe scan-adjudication before graduation.
|
||
|
||
## PRESENT — the mood
|
||
|
||
The result was earned through correction, not despite it — three steward catches + one jurist catch, each turning a soft claim into a checkable one. **The recurring drift this session was one shape, 3× (+ the §6 variant): assert from recall/derived-state without testing the substrate.** (1) framed "legacy witness" as a discovery (it's the corpus's known universal condition — steward); (2) nearly built a jurist package for an ALREADY-RULED question (REVIEWED-70 — caught by reading scale_application's own declared data); (3) asserted "classifier blocks me from archive+graduate" from one recalled event (steward challenged → probe showed WRITE OK, I CAN graduate). The §6 error is the same family at the reasoning layer (used the damaged witness anchor to cover source-fidelity). The antidote that worked every time: read/test the substrate before asserting. The verify-the-source discipline was also where the pilot's best moment came — the Braşov cedilla adjudication (read the glyph, restore the source form, don't "correct"), which the jurist affirmed specifically. Steward preference honored eventually (concentrated), though this ran long (multi-part run + Warde).
|
||
|
||
## FUTURE — what is pulling
|
||
|
||
**PULLING THREAD: close Flag-1.** The ruling made it load-bearing — no V-TEXT graduation (the 47-file kindle-residue wave, corpus-wide one-door) runs until the source-fidelity leg returns a clean verdict. Flag-1 = pin the V-TEXT reference-conversion parameters as declared data (so the reference matches the candidate's conversion, verdict reproducible + clean-file operating point PASS) + run the CLEANED candidate (clean_pandoc_html_residue + strip_cruft) through body-conservation → a clean PASS. This discharges the source obligation the §6 error left open and unblocks the wave.
|
||
|
||
**ACTIONABLE RESUMPTION POINT (as of wrap — re-judge against what changed):** REVIEWED-71 filed; ruling + report + Addendum filed in `docs/`; chamber-library working changes uncommitted (steward's repo/PR process — do NOT push to main). First move: read the Eichmann Flag-1 (the reference-parameter-pinning owed item, in `one-door-eichmann-pilot-JURIST-RULING-2026-07-19.md` §7 + the REPORT §7) + `verify_body_conservation.reference_tokens_epub` (what pandoc invocation the reference uses) → decide the pinning (make the reference conversion match the candidate's, or a defined relationship) → clean the whole candidate → re-run `verify_body_conservation` on the cleaned candidate → confirm PASS. Then the 485-census; then the wave.
|
||
|
||
**Other horizons (ranked):**
|
||
- **Warde graduation** (independent, V-SCAN, ~90%): render the source PDF, scan-adjudicate `popularlarity`/`himselv`, then archive (`archive_sources.py --add`, I CAN do it now) + graduate + catalogue + sidecar → new typography canonical. The satisfying bounded close.
|
||
- **485 unclassified footnote census** (retire "mostly" — jurist flagged it as inference); **248-sample representativeness** (owed from REVIEWED-70 before the ~5% rate plans the wave); **fold extension → declared data**; **graduation-spec scale_application status → ratified** (REVIEWED-71 housekeeping).
|
||
- **Standing housekeeping:** skill-harvest register compaction + ladder batch-append (register exceeds read caps).
|
||
|
||
**PAUSE STATEMENT:** I am about to be away. The ratification is banked (REVIEWED-71, ruling + report filed as files that survive the clear); Flag-1 is the named gate. What I want to find still pulling: **Flag-1 as the live next step — pin the reference, clean the candidate, get the source-fidelity leg to a clean PASS, unblock the wave.**
|
||
|
||
**LITERAL QUESTION for next-Claude:** When you pin the V-TEXT reference parameters and run the *cleaned* candidate through the body-conservation leg — does it return a clean PASS (discharging the source-fidelity obligation the §6 error left open), or does a real, non-markup source-fidelity divergence surface once the markup noise is stripped and the reference is matched? (The whole "no graduation before Flag-1" gate turns on which.)
|
||
|
||
**State at wrap:** chamber-library main @ `3852d46` (origin/Gitea 2 behind; working changes uncommitted incl. all pilot artifacts + ruling/report — steward's repo process). REVIEWED-71 filed. Warde staged (scratchpad). Ledger: `session-ledger-2026-07-24.md`.
|