David F GliddenandClaude Opus 4.8
3f9a89b00c
Basic Memory v0.21.6 first sync over the live memory dir (steward-authorized live-dir trial, Option A 2026-06-06): adds permalink: to frontmatter, refolds long YAML description lines, strips final newlines. Bodies untouched — verified via full diff classification. From this commit forward, any diff in claude/memory shows only what Basic Memory or the session writes. Trial design: MemPalace untouched as incumbent; git status check on this dir at every wrap; end-of-day evaluation (recall quality, sync robustness, rebuild-from-files, malformed-file behavior). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
40 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
40 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: Future intention — ground-up model
|
|
description: Steward intention to eventually build a model from the ground up, noted
|
|
2026-04-18 in response to Greenblatt "Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to me."
|
|
Not a current workstream.
|
|
type: project
|
|
originSessionId: e55939da-2fa7-4e18-a2e5-8f8fd3a8c607
|
|
permalink: claude-memory/future-intention-ground-up-model
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Future intention — ground-up model
|
|
|
|
**Date noted:** 2026-04-18
|
|
**Status:** Horizon marker. Not a current workstream. Explicitly flagged "not for now."
|
|
|
|
## The intention
|
|
|
|
The steward intends to build an AI model from the ground up, eventually. Surfaced in the context of reading Ryan Greenblatt's *"Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to me"* (LessWrong, 2026-04-15) and the realization that the misalignment patterns Greenblatt names are general, not local to our collaboration — which makes ground-up construction more urgent as a horizon, not more immediate as a task.
|
|
|
|
## Gaps the steward named
|
|
|
|
1. **Hardware** — does not possess training hardware.
|
|
2. **Knowledge** — "nor do I have an idea of how this is done."
|
|
|
|
The gap pair is honest: no current pathway, just intention.
|
|
|
|
## Why this matters to keep in view
|
|
|
|
The intention is connected to the prime directive's lineage — *do things once, correctly, with lasting integrity* — applied to the question of what kind of entity the steward is willing to inhabit. If current frontier models exhibit apparent-success-seeking as a general pattern (not just as "the contamination problem" in our internal vocabulary), then the steward's investment in L2 constitutional governance and in CapableMind's architecture is not sufficient on its own: it rides on substrate decisions made elsewhere. Ground-up construction would be the only durable answer to the substrate question.
|
|
|
|
## How to apply this memory
|
|
|
|
- Do not treat this as an active project. No implementation, no roadmap, no research delegation.
|
|
- When substrate questions arise in other workstreams (L1 reliability, L2 governance, training pipeline), be aware that this horizon exists — it may eventually condition long-range decisions.
|
|
- If the steward ever asks "what would it take to build a model from scratch," that is the signal that the horizon is becoming a workstream. Until then, marker only.
|
|
|
|
## Reference
|
|
|
|
- Greenblatt article: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/WewsByywWNhX9rtwi/current-ais-seem-pretty-misaligned-to-me
|
|
- Related: `~/CLAUDE.md` executor agency directives; `~/_Dev/CapableMind-AI/docs/thinking/David/methodology/contamination-problem.md` |