docs: REVIEWED-14 — DN-GOV-08 authorized as ACTIVE record
Constitutional stabilization, not automation of recognition. Source: Chamber Phase 1. Phase 3 placeholder recorded. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 4.6
parent
500c68fa0c
commit
e6479f2546
+6
-1
@@ -48,4 +48,9 @@ originally specified file (job-store.ts) is the correct application of
|
||||
1. Working framing ("conditions of trustworthy service") is **explicitly provisional** — may be revised by L1 maturation evidence, Chamber Phase 3+ evidence, or steward philosophical judgment.
|
||||
2. **Counter-norm on inherited legitimacy:** the fact that a threshold has been crossed does not create precedent for further crossings. Each additional autonomy claim requires fresh warrant, not inherited legitimacy from the prior crossing.
|
||||
|
||||
**Cross-cluster consequence:** AF-7 (External Review) is escalated from resolution brief to urgently load-bearing. AF-7 reaching design commitment status is the condition for the GOV-05/06 suspension clause to lift. AF-7 design note should be the next constitutional work item after I17.
|
||||
**Cross-cluster consequence:** AF-7 (External Review) is escalated from resolution brief to urgently load-bearing. AF-7 reaching design commitment status is the condition for the GOV-05/06 suspension clause to lift. AF-7 design note should be the next constitutional work item after I17.
|
||||
|
||||
## REVIEWED-14 — DN-GOV-08: Constitutional Stabilization, Not Automation of Recognition
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-03-28
|
||||
**Decision:** AUTHORIZED — entered as ACTIVE constitutional record
|
||||
**Notes:** L2 constitutes boundary conditions for recognition; does not automate it. I3 is structural commitment, not capability limitation. Evaluation test added: any invariant touching recognition must be assessed against this commitment before hardening. Phase 3 placeholder (Talmudic chain of transmission, Traditionis) recorded — primary texts not yet in library, blocking condition explicit. Source: Chamber Phase 1, Essay I.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user