23 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
23 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: feedback-close-thoroughly-no-frequent-deferrals
|
|
description: "Steward directive (2026-07-16) — no more frequent deferrals; progress thoroughly even if labour-intensive, to truly close what is closable. Deferrals ARE how the current cloud accumulated."
|
|
metadata:
|
|
node_type: memory
|
|
type: feedback
|
|
originSessionId: fc6bd8d4-2ebd-41e9-b3cd-2a635d8f6951
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Steward directive, 2026-07-16, named while refining the constitution block-map: **"Frequent deferrals is how we came to the current state. If it makes sense, I would like to progress in a thorough fashion even if it is more labour intensive, in order to be able to say that we have truly closed that which is closable."**
|
|
|
|
Prompted by my recommendation to defer the lighter §8 items (B(i) licence · B(ii) PREMIS · PENDING-47) to keep Block 1 lean — the exact expedient move that built the cloud.
|
|
|
|
**Why:** each deferral is reasonable in isolation; the *pile* of deferred items is the very cloud that discourages him ([[feedback-constitution-as-block-then-pull-based-corpus]] — "mining in too many directions"). A block with pieces deferred is not "one established block"; it is a partially-open block wearing the word *closed*. So thoroughness-to-true-closure is not extra labour beside the goal — it IS the block-discipline's goal. This is the Prime Directive's "do things once, correctly" applied to closure.
|
|
|
|
**How to apply:**
|
|
- When closing a block, close **all of it that is closable now** — do not defer the lighter items to keep the block cosmetically small.
|
|
- Distinguish **closable-now** (drafting + its own review) from **genuinely blocked** (depends on a later phase's output). For anything not closable now, name the *specific* dependency — never a vague "defer."
|
|
- "Truly closed that which is closable" is the yardstick: at block-close, be able to say every non-blocked item is done, and every blocked one has a named, dated dependency.
|
|
- Note the "if it makes sense" — this is judgment-invited, not a command to close everything everywhere. The thoroughness is **within the block in hand** (concentrated on ONE block, per [[feedback-shorter-concentrated-sessions]]), taken all the way — not thoroughness spread across many blocks (that would re-thicken the cloud).
|
|
|
|
Resolves the apparent tension with [[feedback-shorter-concentrated-sessions]]: still one concentrated block, but taken to *complete* closure rather than expedient partial-close. Complement to [[feedback-constitution-as-block-then-pull-based-corpus]] (sequencing) — this is the completeness rule for the block you are on.
|